Thats inter ethnic.... its impossible to segregate people based on race in Europe unlike New World .You can't have in Europe Alpines can live over here, Baltids can live over there, Atlantids can live over here....
Printable View
You understand that I'm talking about RACE, right? Of course Alpines and other subraces will mix. In fact, there is no pure country in terms of subrace. I'm asking if Europeans have a problem with Africans living in Denmark for example or Arabs living in the U.K.
this thread needs clarification to eliminate misconception entirely
enlighten yourself
https://i.4pcdn.org/pol/1500996981132.jpg
White nationalism died in WW2.
i'am looking about the political program and orientation of different european political parties and something is disturbed me under the tag national-conservatism/anti-immigration etc some parties are really a scam,i mean over the economical orientation most of the time liberal-conservative a party like the TRUE FINNS in finland is not really a preservationnist pro-finnish party but a kind of patchwork of social-democraty/anti-federal europe/pro-euro/sustaining legal immigration meaning than momo and abdul could settle down with there wives and kids without problems,me, i 'am for kicking them out of europe i'am ethno-centrist/differencialist “the right of peoples to self-determination” ,i'am even ready to gave them a large amount of money for get them back in there shithole more quickly,at the price than they cost us at this level is irrelevant ,even i'am more economically social-liberal than purelly capitalist-liberal but being antikeynesianism/neo-smithianism i'am on the John Stuart Mill/Armatya Sen line in the social-liberalism,i set more with the british line (damn i'am a torry please help!i'am doomed)or in a more recent period the very good and complely underated Maurice Allais,i'am more mutualist/solidarist/utilitarist why we don't own the bonds of the european central bank in that case if we keep the euro as currency ,that's my realistic mutalist part,i think than a synthesis of reasonable liberalism and the best of the socialism/mutualism/utilitarism/solidarism is the only way but get rid of marxism,because before taxing the ressources you need to produce them,i sustain SOHOs and cooperatives,unipersonal coorporations,small industries and enterprises i could been seen center right but without this fucking immigration instrumentalised on our back
-how did you produce?
-with whom did you produce?
-for whom did you produce?
-with what did you produce?
-what is the cost of your production?
-what is the price of your ended product?
-how did you marging? what is the level of your internal taxes?
no needs to be a shitty german philosopher of the 18th century for understand that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Allais
today i'am suprised by norway indeed the norwegian govt is almost "rightie anarchists" figure of speech or rightie libertarians ,even i don't sustain everything they are really special in a kindgdom ,a parlementary monarchy for sure but it's still a kingdom,no, they don't listen "god save the queen" at the parlement don't worry but there are on a line libertarian/national-conservative/liberal-conservative with women as leaders it's very strange,where the communist sweden is the contrary yes because in a big shortcut:
karl marx/engels/hegel->lenine-> rotten scumbags of the italian communist party-> hungarian communists intellectuals rotten scumbags (lucaks)->keynes->new left/maoism/frankfurt school->german social democrats->nordic social-democrats->LGBTQ->antifa->anti-christians->anti-straight/whites/mononuclear-family with modern "cultural marxism" etc ok there are some shades but is more less this path ,keynes should been seen as a satellite not completly in the core but he was contaminated by marxism indirectly,that's it's because i had try to understand why is the mess