I saw many threads about caucasoid subraces but i didn't see many threads about mongoloid and negroid subraces. Why we don't discuss enough about those subraces.
What are the subgroups of negroid and mongoloid?
Printable View
I saw many threads about caucasoid subraces but i didn't see many threads about mongoloid and negroid subraces. Why we don't discuss enough about those subraces.
What are the subgroups of negroid and mongoloid?
Is this True???
https://i.hizliresim.com/1gNogY.png
It's quite simple, just deconstruct what 'talking about subraces' really means in its essence.
1) It's nerding.
Black people are on average more into athleticism, streat amusement or socializing compared to solitary nerding over imagined concepts. While East Asians are arguably even bigger nerds than whites, the other points below will explain why they aren't obsessed with the craniometry/phrenology of this board.
2) It's based on post-Enlightenment naturalism.
For the majority of known human history, people were aware that reality is a multidimensional experience that while having empirical repercussions, cannot be simply be considered to be just matter. Only in Western Europe, specially in Britain, from the late XVIII onwards did people start to really think that such is the case, and in trying to understand humans under the new paradygm, nerding obsessions over physical features naturally became a thing that would naturally appear.
3) It's fill-in for a bigger problem.
Western ethnicities have largely been eroded in meaning during the post-Cold War era of increasingly porous borders and uniformized cultures. Today being a young German person has very little meaning aside from speaking German as your main language, and having some mannerisms native to your location. The popular culture, lifestyle and imagined goals are the same of those of a young French person, young British person, young Danish person or what have you.
On the contrary, Asian ethnicities are very much a source of pride and identity for mongoloids. Even if some people from Northern China are indistinguishable physically from Koreans, the ethnic difference is something they both recognise and identify as more important than the purely zoological morphological similarity.
White ethnicities are increasingly weaker and instead define themselves on ever more primitive grounds, facial shape being an easy option to use. In a way even within whites you can see the difference in the attitude to anthrotardism. Americans who have absolutely no culture are the most obsessed, followed by Western Europeans and Western educated Easterners, and then the normal Eastern European people barely caring about nerdgasms like "the Baltic subrace" or what have you.
TL;DR. White people are the only ones that have large enough numbers of nerds who also happen to have weak political and cultural identities which motivates them to obsess over morphological categories, in a vain attempt to give themselves some semblance of identity and escape nothingness.
Because this is a Eurocentric forum. European cultural forum, memburr?
Irrelevant, lol. If a Nigerians lives in Europe, he is not and will never be European. This forum was supposed to be for Europeans only at one point. Most members are still European therefore most couldn't give a shit what racial types mings, lings and fei's have.
It is pseudoscience after all