The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2,000-year archeogenomic time transect

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leto

I don't wanna talk to you but okay. To be clear, by "Middle Eastern" I mean Biblical Israelite ancestry, not some obscure pre-historic stuff. There's no way they are only 20% Middle Eastern as that model suggests. You need samples from 1000 BC through 1 AD. That's what I'm interested in.

Why won't you talk to me? :confused3:

But no, it's clear that we're not just talking about 20%, you have to make a percentage between that figure and the Levantine groups. If the average Jew has 20% Levant_PPNB and Samaritan has 57.8%, that makes Ashkenazi Jews as at most 36% Jewish. As I wrote in the post, depending on what ancient population is being considered, the percentage may decrease or increase.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Faklon

They look between modern Nothern Italians and Sardinians according to this.

https://www.science.org/cms/10.1126/...abi7673-f2.jpg

Still close to modern Central and Northern Italian whose shift doesn't seem that Near-Eastern as in Levant. Caucasian/CHG of some sort.

They fall firmly within the Iberian cluster. I think there will be mass suicides on IR lolol

late-Etruscan necropolis

Casenovole (Civitella Paganico, Grosseto), n=12
- Geographical coordinates: 43.033319, 11.332940
- Radiocarbon dates range (n=6): 530-200 cal BCE

genotype ratio 64%

Distance to: CSN001
1.07674610 IT_Lombardia
1.21727846 FR_Corsica
1.31327748 Swiss_Italian
1.34293251 IT_Toscania
1.37617915 IT_Liguria
1.37624724 IT_Emilia-Romagna
1.54215180 IT_Trentino
1.66358559 FR_Savoie
1.68819930 Portugal_Norte
1.72788155 IT_Piedmont

Target: CSN001 | ADC: 0.25x RC
74.8 IT_Lombardia
10.7 IT_southern_Sardinian
8.6 FR_Savoie
5.9 ES_Burgos

genotype ratio 41%

Distance to: CSN003
1.02598413 IT_Piedmont
1.09820911 Swiss_Italian
1.11246629 FR_Provence
1.25731274 IT_Trentino
1.26321612 FR_Corsica
1.27150257 ES_Cataluna
1.27518650 ES_Galicia
1.28986361 IT_Lombardia
1.29048287 IT_Veneto
1.29672708 PT_Azores

Target: CSN003 | ADC: 0.25x RC
26.3 IT_Lombardia
19.4 IT_central_Sardinian
18.8 FR_Champagne-Ardenne
15.7 ES_Huesca
8.4 Swiss_Italian
6.6 DE_Brandenburg
4.8 Saudi_Arabian

Is there any substancial Mycenaean or Balkan shift in Etruscans that would explain part of the ''West Asian'' in modern Tuscans? Are we able to measure that even, the populations (Central Italy/Balkans) being exceptionally close?

Code:

780-540 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2 P312 770-520 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu G2a2b2a1 L140/S316 770-540 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan G2a2b2a1a1b L497/S317 - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - 427-265 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu_related - - 380-204 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2d1a Z2247 - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated J2b2a1 L283 - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated R1b1a1b1a1a2 P312 533-392 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2/S139 - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - 427-265 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2 P312 380-204 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_related R1b1a1b1a1a2d1a Z2247 - - n/a n/a - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - 139-326 CE C.Italy_Imperial - - 997-1149 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval R1b1a1b1a L51 - - n/a n/a 805-774 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 772-888 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval - - 775-945 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval - - - C.Italy_Early.Medieval_undated - - - C.Italy_Early.Medieval_undated n/a n/a 899-1016 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval - - 977-1022 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval_ETR014 J1a2a1a2 P58/Page8/PF4698 40-190 CE - n/a n/a 407-534 CE C.Italy_Imperial I1 - 790-550 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a L151 350-100 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_MAS001 G2a2b2a1a1c1a1 CTS5990/Z1903 240-380 CE C.Italy_Imperial R1b1a1b1b Z2103 400-530 CE C.Italy_Imperial R1b1a1b M269/PF6517 804-557 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1 P310 772-960 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2 794-543 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 772-436 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2 356-96 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_related - - 103 BCE-54 CE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2 P312 729-942 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval - - - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated R1b1a1b1a1a2b U152 346-51 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_related R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2 - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated G2a2b2a1a1b1 CTS9737/Z1815 391-207 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr - - - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - 899-1021 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval I1a2a1a1a1a S1954/YSC0000261 - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated R1b1a1b1a1a2 P312 895-1016 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval - - - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated R1b1a1b1a1a1 M405/U106/S21 346-51 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - - C.Italy_Etruscan_undated - - 356-96 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_related R1b1a1b1a L51 346-51 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_related R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2 358-98 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 89-236 CE C.Italy_Imperial J2a1a1a2 Z2229 262-424 CE C.Italy_Imperial J2a1a1a2b1b M319 1018-1151 CE C.Italy_Early.Medieval - - 396-216 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr G2a2b2a1a1c1a1 CTS5990/Z1903 356-96 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a2 PF7589/Z2118 174-53 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan_UDC_P R1b1a1b1a1a2 P312 650-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa J2a1a1a2b2a2b3a L210 650-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa_VEN002 - - 650-763 CE S.Italy_Venosa - - 650-763 CE S.Italy_Venosa J2b2a1 L283 660-766 CE S.Italy_Venosa E1b1b1a1b1 L618 660-766 CE S.Italy_Venosa_related - - 670-775 CE S.Italy_Venosa_related J2b M12 670-775 CE S.Italy_Venosa G2a2b2a1 L140/S316 670-775 CE S.Italy_Venosa J2b2a1 L283 670-775 CE S.Italy_Venosa - - 670-775 CE S.Italy_Venosa - - 672-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa - - 672-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa_related n/a n/a 672-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa - - 672-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa_related - - 672-800 CE S.Italy_Venosa_related G2a2b2a P303/Page108/PF3340/S135/Z765 750-406 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 790-550 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan G2a2b2b1a1a PF3378 800-590 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 360-200 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu - - 359-199 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr_VET006.9 - - 806-599 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 372-204 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr - - 788-545 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan - - 750-413 BCE - n/a n/a 790-550 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2 200-60 BCE C.Italy_Etruscan R1b1a1b1a1a2b1 L2

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucas

late-Etruscan necropolis

Casenovole (Civitella Paganico, Grosseto), n=12
- Geographical coordinates: 43.033319, 11.332940
- Radiocarbon dates range (n=6): 530-200 cal BCE

genotype ratio 64%

Distance to: CSN001
1.07674610 IT_Lombardia
1.21727846 FR_Corsica
1.31327748 Swiss_Italian
1.34293251 IT_Toscania
1.37617915 IT_Liguria
1.37624724 IT_Emilia-Romagna
1.54215180 IT_Trentino
1.66358559 FR_Savoie
1.68819930 Portugal_Norte
1.72788155 IT_Piedmont

Target: CSN001 | ADC: 0.25x RC
74.8 IT_Lombardia
10.7 IT_southern_Sardinian
8.6 FR_Savoie
5.9 ES_Burgos

genotype ratio 41%

Distance to: CSN003
1.02598413 IT_Piedmont
1.09820911 Swiss_Italian
1.11246629 FR_Provence
1.25731274 IT_Trentino
1.26321612 FR_Corsica
1.27150257 ES_Cataluna
1.27518650 ES_Galicia
1.28986361 IT_Lombardia
1.29048287 IT_Veneto
1.29672708 PT_Azores

Target: CSN003 | ADC: 0.25x RC
26.3 IT_Lombardia
19.4 IT_central_Sardinian
18.8 FR_Champagne-Ardenne
15.7 ES_Huesca
8.4 Swiss_Italian
6.6 DE_Brandenburg
4.8 Saudi_Arabian

Please, Lucas, can you do the same withe the samples "Etruscan CEU" who, apparently, plot close or with the French, if i am not mistaken.

Quote:

Originally Posted by J.S.

Please, Lucas, can you do the same withe the samples "Etruscan CEU" who, apparently, plot close or with the French, if i am not mistaken.

From Jovialis' post:

Code:

Distance to: C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu_related:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_427-265BCE:CSN002 9.95255809 Swiss_Italian 10.05901089 Italian_Trentino 10.96726949 Italian_Veneto 11.51826810 Italian_Lombardy 12.05897591 Italian_Aosta_Valley Distance to: C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_360-200BCE:VET005 5.68386312 French_North 6.47929780 French_Northwest 6.56206522 French_Northeast 7.24151918 Belgian 7.40929821 English_South Distance to: C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu:CampigliadeiFoci(Siena_Tuscany)_770-520BCE:CAM002 5.75750814 Italian_Aosta_Valley 5.79004318 French_Northeast 6.57764396 French_North 7.71435675 Bavarian_German 8.10896418 Italian_Trentino

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajeje Brazorf

From Jovialis' post:

Code:

Distance to: C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu_related:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_427-265BCE:CSN002 9.95255809 Swiss_Italian 10.05901089 Italian_Trentino 10.96726949 Italian_Veneto 11.51826810 Italian_Lombardy 12.05897591 Italian_Aosta_Valley Distance to: C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_360-200BCE:VET005 5.68386312 French_North 6.47929780 French_Northwest 6.56206522 French_Northeast 7.24151918 Belgian 7.40929821 English_South Distance to: C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu:CampigliadeiFoci(Siena_Tuscany)_770-520BCE:CAM002 5.75750814 Italian_Aosta_Valley 5.79004318 French_Northeast 6.57764396 French_North 7.71435675 Bavarian_German 8.10896418 Italian_Trentino

Thank you very much !

Admixtures, copied from publication :

Code:

Test Anatolia_N WHG Yamnaya Iran_N Morocco_EN C.Italy_Early.Medieval 0,573 0,066 0,199 0,162 0 C.Italy_Etruscan 0,646 0,122 0,233 0 0 C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr 0,622 0,071 0,054 0,202 0,051 C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu 0,473 0,149 0,377 0 0 C.Italy_Imperial 0,65 0,04 0,15 0,131 0,029 TSI.SG 0,468 0,089 0,196 0,247 0 Tuscan.DG 0,443 0,094 0,223 0,24 0

Why in the official studies they model always ancient/modern italians only with iran neolithic and never with natufian or neolithic levant?

I'm suprised no one talked about this :

Quote:

The three individuals grouped in C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr—after exclusion of a genetic outlier (Materials and Methods, Fig. 4A, and table S2A)—cannot be modeled as a mixture between Neolithic-related and Bronze Age–related European ancestries (table S4B). These individuals are dated to around 300 BCE and were excavated at two archeological sites separated by a distance greater than 100 km (Tarquinia and Vetulonia). Statistics in the form f3(C.Italy_Etruscan, X; C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr) and f4(Onge, X, C.Italy_Etruscan, C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr) show evidence of C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr being a mixture of Etruscans and ancient or modern-day individuals (as a proxy) carrying high proportions of north African or sub-Saharan ancestries (tables S2, B and C, and S3, A and B). Using qpAdm, all admixture models including C.Italy_Etruscan as one of the sources are rejected (table S4D). However, given the limited availability of genomes from northern Africa with comparable ages (26), we caution that ancestry proportions might be more correctly estimated as additional data from this region become available.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abi7673

Another proof carthaginians were north african, it's crazy how almost every paper on ancient Iberia/italy show either north african admixture or north african individuals.