Why didn't Scythians conquer land like Turks and Mongols

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blogen

They lived in the Caucasus, but a part of their ancestors came from Central Asia.



Less Mongoloid in Europe.

ancient Scythians in Altay: majority were Europo-Mongoloid with a significant Europid minority.
ancient Sakas in Central Asia: majority were Europid with a significant Europo-Mongoloid minority.
ancient Scythians in Europe: majority were Europid with a small Europo-Mongoloid minority.
ancient Sarmatians in Europe: majority were Europid with a small Europo-Mongoloid minority.

But I collect the accurate data once soon.

---

Are you talking about ancient Scythians ( before expanded ) or Ancient scythians ( who expanded later ). I mean from the 4th century BC to 7th century BC, they so called Scythians were no longer as pure as they were before.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Are you talking about ancient Scythians ( before expanded ) or Ancient scythians ( who expanded later ). I mean from the 4th century BC to 7th century BC, they so called Scythians were no longer as pure as they were before.

---

Of course same time, before the fall of the European Scythians (by the Sarmatians) around 3-4th century BC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blogen

Clear Caucasoid.

---

I doubt it. You can tell there is something different about his eyes and cheeks compared with other reconstruction of Scythian.


I'm willing to bet Rob Shneider who is 1/4 Filipino is more Caucasoid than that skull

http://cdn.breitbart.com/mediaserver...0Schneider.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

I doubt it. You can tell there is something different about his eyes and cheeks compared with other reconstruction of Scythian.

---

His cheekbone is rounded and not flat based on the reconstruction:

http://www.peshera.org/khrono/Fotos-08/foto-114.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blogen

The original and the conquered lands of the Scythians, Sarmatians and their direct descendants (Kushans, Alanians, etc.):

http://s27.postimg.org/d07ppc9ib/scytsarm.jpg

---

Royal Kushans were Turkic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanishka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huvishka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turushka

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kipchak Håkan

Royal Kushans were Turkic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanishka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huvishka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turushka

---

In a pan-Turkic dream maybe.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Anglojew

The Scythians and Turks intermingled creating the Sarmatians, Khazars etc.

---

That part is true because there is a Irano-Sarmatian substratum in the Turkic languages of Volga area. But Indo-Scythians were possibly also a blend of Turko-Iranians.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blogen

In a pan-Turkic dream maybe.

---

Oh honey, the only dream is you here :bored:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blogen

His cheekbone is rounded and not flat based on the reconstruction:

http://www.peshera.org/khrono/Fotos-08/foto-114.jpg

---

Are you sure they aren't two different people?

Yours is a sculpture of Skillur I doubt that's accurate

He looks more caucasoid in this but still more mongoloid than yours

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...thian_King.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ButlerKing

Are you sure they aren't two different people?
Yours is a sculpture of Skillur I doubt that's accurate
He looks more caucasoid in this but still more mongoloid than yours

---

This is same reconstruction. :picard2:

And there is not metisation without flat face.