Read in context! :picard2: Ugly+neopagan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick
What a difference, what hg he is? Espeically,
if I said it allready, before I knew his hg. Stop
being such insecure Dick... There is really no
conspiracy against I1. And if you think, that
guy will have much different opinion, than I,
then you probably did not listen to him carefully.
Reffering to some polish MEP's naming problems, it lead me to conclusion, that even such words as surnames,
which are basically meaningless, aren't so much in the real life. Many times, people have been killed, because
they have "wrong surnames" - i.e. either ethnically either socially incorrect. And noone was ever asking them,
what is your autosomal because usually people have this subconcious belive that lineage matters, not auDNA,
and lineage is ususally described by family name, in most cases, having a form in the language of oldest origin.
Also many assimilational actions lead by many governments were forcing the change of names, as for example
in Hungary in XIXth century, in many cases in Nazi Germany or communistic countries after WW2. Therefore if
it would have no value being irrelevant, then noone would bother. But usually people do, because most people
have this very important instinct, who tells them, that patrilineage matters. Matters of course not only on the
level of religion, culture, law or politics (which it does) but also in such basic matter as survival and the mental
health (probably two issues are bind together). And no matter how coutless would be exeptions (they always
were, are, will be, and should be) they will always prove the rule. And this is what really is about. Simple rule.
And as Searsolina very wisely has said: ethnicity is patrilinear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stearsolina
It's incorrect. In that thread I replied to her post and I was arguing autosomal is important too, she thumbed me up therefore agreed with me. https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6968370Quote:
Originally Posted by Rethel