Their names are Jože Plut and Alen Koman, if you need more pics
Type: Posts; User: vbnetkhio; Keyword(s):
Their names are Jože Plut and Alen Koman, if you need more pics
https://mravljisce.si/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/joze_plut_alen_koman_FOTO_STA_Facebook.jpg
They do act weird in G25. I think there is some impact.
But there's another Baltic-like early Slavic sample, which is of higher quality:
...
the other one is:
https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-Y88926/
you should search in this thread. I believe most of the Y-DNA results from this study were posted here....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuri
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budini
and this is his haplo:
https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-YP578/ it's not too rare, but it's mostly limited to Russia, not pan-Slavic.
I don't think this is a Slav. He is probably an early Galindian or...
In 100 AD, Slavs probably were like modern Lithuanians, but the actual Balts of this period were even more "northern", unlike anything today
What you say about Slavs still stands, but things get...
Both Balts and Slavs would have to travel a huge distance trough non-balto-slavic territories to join the Roman army. I don't see why these have to be Slavs in particular. They could also be a third...
they are typical for Hungary. less dinarid and more north euro types compared to Serbs, more darker med types compared to Slovenians and Slovaks.
maybe most similar to Croats.
They also share no Y-DNA with ancient Greeks. Those are most likely Paeonians, and not Macedonians.
The real Macedonians were in northern Greece, and spoke a language closely related to Greek,...
they were a big "roman mix", but mostly IA Balkanian + Middle Eastern/Greek/Anatolian Romans
Maybe an early Vojvodina Serb, they settled from southern areas and tend to get southern results like this.
the sample is dated 1468-1636 so it fits.
I mean the pre-slavic Balkanians, Vlachs. They weren't actual Italians, but genetically very similar to modern Italians, and spoke Latin.
The sample is from Brcko (Tuzla area). This area was a part of early medieval Serbia, and never even ruled by Croats. So this is a White Serb more likely.
There's also a similar sample from...
the Balkan label is debatable in Romania, Greece, Croatia. In between (Serbia, Bosnia..) it's completely accepted, nobody there will strongly oppose being Balkanian.
he's wrong.
anyway, I don't think g25/gedmatch level genetics can help answer this question.
South Slavs are basically an Italian-like + Ukrainian mix in various amounts, but the dinaric/pre-Slavic Balkan...
Bosniaks, not Bosnians.
Sandzak is not a village in Bosnia, but a region in Serbia and Montenegro.
the people there don't have much genetically in common with Bosnian Bosniaks, but they are a...
yes, there are regional differences:
Distance to: Italian_South
21.60213415 Bosniak_Sandzak_East
27.04205798 Bosniak_Sandzak_West
29.58937309 Bosniak_Southeast...
maybe if you bothered to check further, northeast Bosniaks are a bit more Slavic than any group of Croats (35% Baltic), and Sandzak Bosniaks are way less Slavic than any group of Croats (24% Baltic)...
most Bosniaks are either hardcore Dinaric, or lighter types which are Austrian/Hungarian looking.
among Croats you can find more proper "meds", Italian/Spanish looking, but are usually much taller...
where are you getting this from? not a single true fact here, except for the probable Albanian ancestry in some clans.
(ok, maybe more than just one, but put in a very weird way)
bump
He doesn't have much Dinaric nor Med feautres. Maybe he's more of a dark pigmented Balt?
Somebody in the comments called him "1/4 Black looking".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq720Rd_s8U