https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3UpRnkSkQ4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKX0ItADkTQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWG-BoHX47M
Type: Posts; User: Creoda; Keyword(s):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3UpRnkSkQ4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKX0ItADkTQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWG-BoHX47M
Drop bears.
It's just a bit pointless as a question, since White Americans aren't an ethnicity, but an aggregate of every racially 'White' person in the US, which officially includes Jews, Middle Easterners,...
By the same rationale, Scandinavians are 'genetically closer' to Poles than to other NW Europeans.
Target: Swedish
Distance: 4.6513% / 0.04651320
50.8 Yamnaya_Samara
32.6 Barcin_N
16.6 WHG
...
My quick attempt at an objective playlist of the 100 greatest popular songs by British bands/artists (post-war), in terms of impact + quality, not necessarily my favourites.
...
I mean ffs, Friesland was literally repopulated by the same wave of migrating Anglo-Saxons at the same time England was. That's why the English and Frisians spoke mutually intelligible language until...
Scandinavians are also mixed with 'Celtic' as well as other things since the Viking era, part of Norway apparently has as much as 25% Insular Celtic, plus more Southern ancestry. Nobody is exactly...
They are. Thus useless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Yl2PXAdGQ8&list=LL&index=7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JzhP8qfbqE&list=LL&index=2
Gold Coast in the late 80s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbGkfOm5_i8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SK7qeaucF1U
Sydney in the early 90s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvYqvYlD9a4
Which raises the question again why people keep using G25 averages as a reference when they're clearly inaccurate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7P7BFBWQ1E
The modern population the Anglo-Saxon invaders resembled are Frisians, that is who English Germanic types most resemble, and also the closest linguistic cousin to English on the continent.
Meaney is a stereotype. This forum is obsessed with stereotypes and extremes, average people of each nation are marginalised on this supposed anthropology forum.
It's nearly always Ashleigh for girls not Ashley, at least in Australia.
No big loss anyway. Not like it's a traditional given name.
lol
Welcome back JamesBond007
Same here. I wouldn't be able to hum one of her songs even. She'll be easily forgotten in 10 years.
This thread was about Irish vs English closeness to Anglo-Saxons, that's what I responded to. No idea why you're bringing Scandinavians into it.
And btw, Saxon and Kentish English were already...
Are you really confused why? Feminists. Mainstream media is infested with them.
What exactly do you think the first PCA shows? There's never been a more extensive study. The Anglo-Saxon samples in all the studies are overwhelmingly from the 400s-700s.
I once read that it had possible Celtic origins, but I can't find that now, so your guess is as good as mine.
Try to find one study that shows the Anglo-Saxons were genetically closer to the Irish than to the English (even leaving aside the fact that Anglo-Saxons and English were synonymous until the...
Global25 isn't reliable for genetic distances of NW Europeans, let alone phenotypical distances.
Also far more likely that AI will be ultimately more beneficial to the third-world than just throwing more money and aid at them.
I'd rather see the money spent on AI.