Search:

In g25 it's possible to perform such a deciphering, but it's more complex, however, it's the general consensus that they were closest to Danes and Scandinavians and dutch, not just based on g25...

Fair enough

And though extremely rare, women would be used as last resorts, not active participants in front lines, from example, women of cimbiri and teuton tribes fighting the romans off as a last resort...

Hahahaha this is soo true, there's more evidence that paganism was much more brutal for women than Christianity hahahaha, vikings literally practiced female biased infanticide, that's enough evidence...

Yeah but you have zero proof that these saxons weren't genetically the most closest to Scandinavians, english will never be the taking that closest postion

this is not as extensive as this does not cover the samples specifically from early anglo saxon settlers from around 500-early 700, those samples are closest to modern day danes, norweigans and dutch...

"household. Germanic society was fully patriarchal, and tribes like the Alemanni beat women whose clothes were deemed immodest (showing the leg above the knee). Germans were also often polygynous;...

so what? even women from islam can divorce their husbands, doesnt mean shit lol oh by the way

"Selective Female Infanticide as Partial Explanation for the Dearth of Women in Viking Age...

using modern examples is rudimentary, as phenotypes were different back then, but modern people are certainly ten times more gracile then their ancestors from scandanvia

why are viking women always depicted in viking shows or media? theres practically zero proof of them coming in hordes or even yet, being a single viking warrior who was a female, theres actually a...

this is wrong, old saxons and generally people from warrior cultures had endomoprhic body builds, basically very large frames and thick wide wrists on average, proven by anthropometry, bone mineral...

okay, you forgot to put in scandanvian to see the distance between them and boom, they are genetically closest to scandanvians, so they looked like scandanvian people

you use craniometry averages to see whom looked like whom, i have plenty of them if you would like to see, but to ansewr your question, taking in regards the genetics of old anglo saxons and...

no they would not

129245

129244

he has a very narrow jaw, anyways, hes a king from scotland pretty sure, already seen the facial reconstruction

crazy how modern swedish phenotypes changed substantially from their ancestor times from viking age for example, this is what mixing with other races and softer diet does to a population, most men...

hahahahahha, what a big psuedo anthropology ahhaah, if i asked you for proof or genetic evidence for any of what your saying you would evade shamefully

thank god someone smart in this thread who understands there was a different look between germanic and celts and bell beaker

this is absolutely false, there is no such thing as phenotypic "evolution" only thing evolution or environmental factors would influence is jaw size and overall robcsusity or delicacy.

because beakers already looked distinct to modern germanic, proven by anthropology, also the problem is irish are mixed with hallstatt culture ancestry, you must be aware of the subsequent celtic...

none of these look norweigan, all look lappish and finnish, pure scandanvian/germanic phenotypes are heavily diluted today thanks to diet and genetic mixture with other groups thanks to viking age...

wym if he had no eastern euro or steppe ancestry?

dude, you have any new recent Afghans that look western euro or scandanvian or have blond hair?