Can Snooki pass for 100% Native American?

**~~Sikeliot~~** · 12-18-2013, 01:54 AM

Originally Posted by Hassad

Snooki does not look full native american. I'd estimate her to be around 60 to 75% indigenous. Her indigenous subtype is not Andid, rather reduced Patagonid/Pampid which are more common in Chile.

Can you post someone who you think is of the same type as her?

**~~Han Cholo~~** · 12-18-2013, 01:56 AM

Originally Posted by Sikeliot

Can you post someone who you think is of the same type as her?

Sure. I think you could see the difference very clearly:

**max1994** · 12-18-2013, 02:46 AM

Originally Posted by Sikeliot

So how much native might she be?

I'm not expert but I think 60-70% native american

**max1994** · 12-18-2013, 02:56 AM

I think in chile bypasses mestiza, if indo mestiza, as euro has something but very little

**max1994** · 12-20-2013, 12:24 AM

Originally Posted by Hassad

Sure. I think you could see the difference very clearly:

Mapuche have lighter skin than snooki

**~~Brighton~~** · 12-20-2013, 01:31 AM

Yeah but she loves tanning.. She probably has a skin colour similar to the Mapuche average -which is lighter than most Native Americans across the Americas-.

**Prisoner Of Ice** · 01-08-2014, 10:29 PM

Originally Posted by Smeagol

This is the truth! Most DNA is Junk DNA, and does nothing.

That's not really true. There's coding and noncoding DNA. The coding dna gives different versions of chemicals. This is just easy to figure out because we can look at various genes and then look at which type of hemoglobin someone has, for instance.

The noncoding genes don't do nothing, though. All the evidence says that the noncoding genes are what makes the difference between people's intelligence, for example.

Which makes sense. How many types of end result chemicals can there be? It's not the basic building blocks that make the difference, it's how things are constructed.

I am on the fence whether this info has been put out because people in general, including scientists, are mainly retarded or if it's for political reasons. Because the differences between people in CODING DNA are very small. Even the differences between people and rats is not that big. The difference in noncoding DNA is HUGE, basically everyone is wildly different by that standard. Probably some of the DNA doesn't do anything, but obviously the how-to guide on growing a body and brain has to be somewhere, and it's all in the RNA.