"Give that baby to homos" the Court ordered.

[Wölfin]

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but it seems like you're saying that allowing the homosexual couple to adopt, who are physiologically incapable of making a child, is less of a "political experiment" than a policy that gives preferential treatment to prospective heterosexual adopters who can provide the natural gender roles?

¿Que?

But... Often heterosexual couples wanting to adopt are those who are sterile. Homosexual couples can at least use sperm donors in the case of lesbians. I admit I'm a little more stumped about male-male couples...

Also science has shown you no longer even need a male you can create sperm cells from a woman's spine cells meaning sterile couples and lesbian couples will be able to have their own full biological children.

[Wölfin]

- Because themselfs they are diffrent from what society is used to?

Probably. And I'm also willing to bet same-sex couples anyway try to instill tolerance in their values considering they are in an odd position to be intolerant of things that wouldn't harm them otherwise.

[anonymaus]

- Yes.

If you find the time, could you explain why you think it's more normal for homosexuals to have children than people whose reproductive parts interlock rather than bump pointlessly together?

[Bari]

Probably. And I'm also willing to bet same-sex couples anyway try to instill tolerance in their values considering they are in an odd position to be intolerant of things that wouldn't harm them otherwise.

- Exactly. This combined with negative episodes(harassment from other kids) involving their adoptive parents sexuality probably only strenghten theese ideals. But how each child grows up and reacts to their situation is individual.
From my point of view i don't see this as a valid claim from the homosexuals to have a child. Its not a human right having a baby.

[Wölfin]

If you find the time, could you explain why you think it's more normal for homosexuals to have children than people whose reproductive parts interlock rather than bump pointlessly together?

What of reproductive parts that interlock but "shoot blanks"?
Of course it's as natural for homosexuals as heterosexuals to be able to have children, but one must leave the modern concept of "couple" and go back to something more primitive, more animal. But then that spins off on a whole other moral/social tangent and I'm not going there, not now, not today.
But basically if the parties stay within one couple lol a sterile heterosexual couple and a fertile homosexual couple have indeed no better chances than the other of producing offspring. However a fertile heterosexual couple indeed will always produce more offspring than a fertile homosexual one

- Exactly. This combined with negative episodes(harassment from other kids) involving their adoptive parents sexuality probably only strenghten theese ideals. But how each child grows up and reacts to their situation is individual.
From my point of view i don't see this as a valid claim from the homosexuals to have a child. Its not a human right having a baby.

I don't know if it is a claim at all I was just stating my observations in regards to the comment asking whether or not adopted children have higher chances of being homosexual.

[Fortis in Arduis]

I know a lovely girl who was adopted by two stable coupled lesbians and she was a difficult kid anyway, but eventually sorted herself out and married a man who she met whilst serving in the Royal Navy.

I also went to school with a girl who had two mums. She was obviously very well brought up and from a stable background with extended family support.

I do not really have a clear opinion on this.

Whilst I appreciate the importance of the nuclear family and believe that it is the basic unit of society, I think that other arrangements are possible, although they should never be considered as equal or equivalent to that basic unit.

[Tabiti]

Do you think adopted children of homosexual couples have more chances to become homosexuals themselves ?

Depends on the "parents". If they are one of those drag queen and proud queer types most probably yes. If they behave normal and tell the child that their sexuality is different then most people's, probably no.
However, I'm against adoption by homosexuals. Even if heterosexual one day, just try to imagine how would the child feel, especially if other children start to harass him/her because had "two fathers" or "two mothers".

[Bari]

If you find the time, could you explain why you think it's more normal for homosexuals to have children than people whose reproductive parts interlock rather than bump pointlessly together?

- I might have misunderstood myself and read a bit quick. Heterosexuals should be preferred before homosexuals for adoption. Of course i think sterile heterosexuals should be preferred firstly. Its usually those who want to adopt.

[Tony]

But... Often heterosexual couples wanting to adopt are those who are sterile. Homosexual couples can at least use sperm donors in the case of lesbians. I admit I'm a little more stumped about male-male couples...

Also science has shown you no longer even need a male you can create sperm cells from a woman's spine cells meaning sterile couples and lesbian couples will be able to have their own full biological children.

Laurentine have you read The cleft by Doris Lessing?

Do you think adopted children of homosexual couples have more chances to become homosexuals themselves ?

I quite believe so , if you think how many gays in the closet western conservative societies had produced in the past you will soon realize how many gay wannabes a pc society can and will create , especially at the expense of lonely guys with a fragile personality.

[Svanhild]

Of course it's as natural for homosexuals as heterosexuals to be able to have children

No it's not natural for homosexuals to be able to have children, a partner of the opposite sex is needed. The natural number of children for homosexual couples is zero. But they try to obtain children with unnatural ideologies of leveling down.

However a fertile heterosexual couple indeed will always produce more offspring than a fertile homosexual one

But of course. Every positive number is greater than zero!

Homosexuality is no disease and I accept homosexuals. I'm sort of bisexual myself with past adventures with both genders but I'm leaning towards men. If my sexual orientation would switch to a clear preference for other women I'd never ever demand the same rights on childbearing and adoption as heterosexual couples. I's not fair and greatly improper.