Lol, look what we've got here:
- Robocop goes touchy. Well, dude, first of all, I didn't say Atlantids/Nordo-Med blends don't exist but that as long as they have both Nordic and Mediterranean features, it doesn't matter if they are brown or blue-eyed. They are basically the same mix. Question to you:
If two brothers have the same skull type, similar features, both of them showing Nordic and Mediterranean traits, is eye colour still enough of a determinator for you to classify them as different types? For me it certainly isn't.
And I'm not inventing anything out of my ass. Carleton Coon did have a set of blue-eyed people with Atlanto-Med morphology:
https://www.theapricity.com/snpa/troeplate24.htm
I didn't, however, say Atlantids don't exist. I only said you are narrowing the spectrum of how a supposed Atlantid can look like.
I did say that North Atlantid as defined by SNPA is a highly subjective term I no longer use (and I have used rarely and nowadays sorry for actually having used it).
I expressed my opinion based on actual data from authors here:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...contemplations
I have no problem with people who use it but don't make me do it, ok?
Now, something else, because I see you expressing some supposed disappointment of me. Honestly speaking, I had more respect for you before making numerous threads of what The Apricity was before you and would have been without you. Also, your generalizations of ethnicities and phenotypes' traits and how Atlantids (who represent a later mix, after all) are superior than all others have gone too far for me. I'll tell you the same I said to SardiniaAtlantis some time ago. Both Mediterranean and Nordic people had their great achievements before any mass mixing between the two happened. Even later pure forms of both (especially Keltic Nordids) contributed strongly to humanity and civilizations. Why do you think that Atlantids are better than both of their Med and Nordic ancestors? Where is the proof for that boasting? How about recognizing many great successes in history done by people of Alpine or Dinaric type? How about stopping to attribute qualities to entire phenotypical groups (this last question I direct to Silver Lining, too)? Only shallow people do that in reality.
The rest of the bullshit written here lately (especially by meiliren) I don't feel need to comment. They come from a guy who has several accounts already banned on this forum (meiliren) who liked posting people from one ethnicity and present them as another, one day quotes Coon as his GOD and the other denies many of his works simply because that doesn't suit him in an argument.
And Silver Lining has too much trust in attributing mentality/behaviour qualities to entire phenotypical groups, as I already said. Kinda quite anti-med in his writing style but it's his right even though I often disagree with generalizations he makes. Brunn is an actual phenotype and not the result of alcoholism, like I already pointed out as opposed to his claim in a thread some time ago.
Bookmarks