Which countries/ethnicities/nationalities look out of place for their location?

[Firenna]

Could be. But our blood/DNA is very similar to each other. Both Aryans (Western Iranics) and native Caucasians are evolved from the very same CHG/Irn_ChL people.

Genetically Caucasians plot much closer to me than people from Southcentral Asia. Actually even Levantines plot closer to me than Southcentral Asian people from Pakistan.


So, scientifically speaking modern Aryans and modern Hurrians (Caucasians) are very, very close to each other an dboth belong to a Caucaso-Iranic human race.

Iran_N is the source population of both CHG and Iran_Chl. The difference is that CHG has extra EHG and WGH and Iran_Chl has extra Levantine farmer ancestry. Iranian and Levantine farmers are related because they are both about half Basal Eurasian.
The original Aryans had CHG and EEF ancestry but obtained it from different sources (the first through the Caucasian input into the Pontic-Caspian Steppe and the second in Central Europe) so there is no direct Iran_Chl in Aryans although the ancestral components are similar.

[Guti]

Iran_N is the source population of both CHG and Iran_Chl. The difference is that CHG has extra EHG and WGH and Iran_Chl has extra Levantine farmer ancestry. Iranian and Levantine farmers are related because they are both about half Basal Eurasian.
The original Aryans had CHG and EEF ancestry but obtained it from different sources (the first through the Caucasian input into the Pontic-Caspian Steppe and the second in Central Europe) so there is no direct Iran_Chl in Aryans although the ancestral components are similar.

Kurds are the real Aryans/Medes. The rest is just wannabes, you like it or not.


Natufian, WHG, ChG and Iran_n were all related since the ancient times.Whg is also derived from basal eurasian. Iran_n /chg is as far from natufians as whg is from natufian.

Kurds have chg/irn_chl. This is where irn_n in kurds comes from.

Also, Proto-indo europeans had anf and not eef. Kurds have also more anf than eef.


TRUE ARYANS were the superior Medes of a superior master race. They were iron_age north western iranic people of a caucaso-iranic master race. My superior dna is identintical to them.

[Firenna]

Kurds are the real Aryans/Medes. The rest is just wannabes, you like it or not.


Natufian, WHG, ChG and Iran_n were all related since the ancient times.Whg is also derived from basal eurasian. Iran_n /chg is as far from natufians as whg is from natufian.

Kurds have chg/irn_chl. This is where irn_n in kurds comes from.

Also, Proto-indo europeans had anf and not eef. Kurds have also more anf than eef.


TRUE ARYANS were the superior Medes of a superior master race. They were iron_age north western iranic people of a caucaso-iranic master race. My superior dna is identintical to them.

Only 20% of the ancestry of Kurds is Aryan.
Levantine and Iranian farmers have basal Eurasian while WHG does not.
Natufians are half WHG-like and half Basal Eurasian, that's why they're equidistant with WHG and Iran_N, who are half Basal Eurasian too.
The main southern farmer ancestry in Kurds is Levant_N, not CHG.
Proto-Indo-Europeans had Middle Neolithic European farmer ancestry, which was higher in WHG than ANF. ANF farmers lived millennials before proto-Indo-Europeans picked their Neolithic farmer ancestry in Europe so you're confusing events by thousands of years.
True Aryans were the Sintashta people whose closest modern relatives are Scandinavians. You're the rapebabie of the rapebabie of their rapebabie so it's understandable that you're ashamed of yourself and resort to lie non-stop.

[Septentrion]

My two nominations are:

(1) The UK. Despite the fact that most of the country has a more northerly latitude than the Netherlands and Germany, the British are, as a whole, noticeably darker-haired than the Germans and the Dutch. This goes against the usual pattern that the further north you go, the more blondes there are.

(2) Iran. Despite being so far east, Iranians are, as a whole, considerably lighter-complexioned than Iraqis, Gulf Arabs and South Asians. Thus, their location does seem to be rather anomalous.

Does anyone else have any ideas?

Slovenia, I would say. As it is lighter-haired and lighter-eyed than northern Italy, Croatia and Romania as well.

[Tooting Carmen]

Slovenia, I would say. As it is lighter-haired and lighter-eyed than northern Italy, Croatia and Romania as well.

True.

[Septentrion]

Kurds are the real Aryans/Medes. The rest is just wannabes, you like it or not.


Natufian, WHG, ChG and Iran_n were all related since the ancient times.Whg is also derived from basal eurasian. Iran_n /chg is as far from natufians as whg is from natufian.

Kurds have chg/irn_chl. This is where irn_n in kurds comes from.

Also, Proto-indo europeans had anf and not eef. Kurds have also more anf than eef.


TRUE ARYANS were the superior Medes of a superior master race. They were iron_age north western iranic people of a caucaso-iranic master race. My superior dna is identintical to them.

Yes, you might be descendants from the Medes as they were an Eastern Iranian people. However there is no actual proof for this saying. Though the possibility is there.

[Septentrion]

My two nominations are:

(1) The UK. Despite the fact that most of the country has a more northerly latitude than the Netherlands and Germany, the British are, as a whole, noticeably darker-haired than the Germans and the Dutch. This goes against the usual pattern that the further north you go, the more blondes there are.

(2) Iran. Despite being so far east, Iranians are, as a whole, considerably lighter-complexioned than Iraqis, Gulf Arabs and South Asians. Thus, their location does seem to be rather anomalous.

Does anyone else have any ideas?

The Dutch overall are more blonde than Germans. The Germans are typically heavier than other Nordics and their hair is generally darker. Though quite a few do share the light hair and blue eyes typical of Nordic people. Thus Germans are also out of location? Or not.

[Septentrion]

The English and Germans are about the same in terms of skintone and eye colour, but there are definitely more blondes among the latter than the former. This does NOT mean the very blonde/fair English people are rare, just LESS common than in other parts of Northern Europe.

The English and Germans are not really the same in terms in skin and eye colour. The English are paler-skinned ( have more skin types which don’t darken) and lighter-eyed. On the hand, Northern Germans are blonder-haired as a whole, while the English are more red-haired. The Eastern English are lighter-haired ( if we added blondish with reddish hair) than Northern Germans, lighter-eyed, lighter-skinned.

[Septentrion]

The British and Irish in particular break the traditional pigmentation rule of Europe. The traditional mode is that the more northwards one goes in to Europe, the more blond or fairer-haired, the more blue or lighter-eyed, the more pale or fairer-skinned a population becomes. This is true for most populations of Europe, example going from Italy to Denmark, it gets lighter as one moves north. Or from Greece northwards into Estonia and Finland. In the British Isles, it doesn’t work, as Ireland being darker-haired than Britain, is lighter-eyed, lighter-skinned. Reasons for this are genetical and climatic. Ireland is just as light-eyed as Scandinavian countries.

[Guti]

Yes, you might be descendants from the Medes as they were an Eastern Iranian people.

The Medes were NorthWestern Iranian people, just like Kurds. The Medes language is classified as a NorthWestern Iranian language, just like Kurdish.