Elongated skulls sequended show their own mtdna mutations and increased cranial volume

[Prisoner Of Ice]

Didn't know that about star child.

Information is produced for a reason and I do believe someone is pushing the Space/UFO/Annunaki meme, so my question is why are they pushing it so hard? Maybe I'm wrong and there is no agenda, it's simply economic they know White folk will eat this stuff up.

How many humanoid type creatures do you think existed? And do you think the elongated heads are a new species or possible deformity?

You could define as many races as you want. You could easily say people with cleft chins are a race. I don't think there were any humanlike beings on earth that were wholly unrelated to humans, though.

I have extra knee ligament and a 'broken' foot that is much more flexible than average person, doesn't mean I am wholly unrelated - those are probably neanderthal features, though.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

More disinfo.

1. Bigfoot is absolutely real, read up on Robert Lindsay's blog to learn about it. That, too, is being covered up, which is why mainstream "scientists" had to "debunk" it.
2. The skulls have Caucasoid features, so they can't be Amerindians
3. They have a larger cranial volume than normal skulls, meaning it was impossible for them to be produced by head binding

I think the whole cranial volume thing basically settles the matter on its own.

I would not say normal caucasoid, the facial features like eye sockets are very odd.

The ones pictured don't show it but most similar skulls have extreme acralomegy, too. Some of them were estimated to be around 8 foot tall.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

I have extra knee ligament and a 'broken' foot that is much more flexible than average person

Since someone asked, about 1 in 13 people (mainly in NW europe) have a foot that can actually close a bit. If you have it you will have a rolling gait when you run. It's mainly good for climbing but is also good for walking silently but quickly.

[Roy]

http://higherperspective.com/2014/02...on_object_map=[1399405303651996]&action_type_map=[%22og.likes%22]&action_ref_map=[]#

fake results from ''scientists''.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

fake

Skulls have been around for 80+ years. If they are fakes they are old fakes and no one has been able to disprove them.

[Ultra]

Since someone asked, about 1 in 13 people (mainly in NW europe) have a foot that can actually close a bit. If you have it you will have a rolling gait when you run. It's mainly good for climbing but is also good for walking silently but quickly.

Cool, I probably have that, actually. Nice.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

fake results from ''scientists''.

Probably, but I guess we'll see.

The tiny man had a regular native haplogroup. I am not sure you can really do anything crazy with an mtdna result, anyway.

I would wonder if the skulls are fakes, but seems like something that would be very difficult, and would have been discovered by now.

[Roy]

Skulls have been around for 80+ years. If they are fakes they are old fakes and no one has been able to disprove them.

Skulls are real, but this man just wants to have some publicity so he added up some made-up history about them being extraterrestrial or having ''mitochondrial mutation''. The Starchild turned out to be human too (but with anomaly). Brian Foerster was even featured in ''Ancient Aliens'' after all ...

[Tropico]

Skulls have been around for 80+ years. If they are fakes they are old fakes and no one has been able to disprove them.

I think he means the DNA results are fake not the skulls. The skulls look interesting but I'm sure the actual results would just reveal genetic mutations.

[Amud]

I would not say normal caucasoid, the facial features like eye sockets are very odd.

The ones pictured don't show it but most similar skulls have extreme acralomegy, too. Some of them were estimated to be around 8 foot tall.

I'm familiar with all of that since I've researched this extensively. Caucasoid might not be the best descriptor, you're right, since they would definitely stick out like a sore thumb around Europeans. What I meant is that they were "white people", definitely not Mongoloid/Amerind, and have certain features associated with Caucasoids (retreating cheekbones, prominent chins, high nasal roots). This shows that they can not have been Amerinds who practiced cranial deformation, as the orthodoxy claims.