Second US baby is HIV-free after early treatment

[Kazimiera]

Second US baby is HIV-free after early treatment



A baby treated for HIV within hours of birth is free of the virus nearly a year later, in the second case that has raised hopes about early treatment, doctors said.

The approach mirrored that taken for a Mississippi baby, who has been off treatment for 21 months and still has no detectable virus in her system.

The latest research on the two young girls was presented at the annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Boston.

The newest case involves a Los Angeles baby who was born to a mother infected with HIV and who had not been taking her medications, making her at high risk for transmission, said Yvonne Bryson, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Audra Deveikis, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Miller Children's Hospital Long Beach, where the baby was born, tested the infant and gave her high, treatment-level doses of antiretroviral drugs before even knowing if she was HIV-positive, Bryson told AFP by phone from the conference.

"The way it works is you test and you treat before you know the results because it takes several days to get the results," explained Bryson, a consultant on the case.

Treatment started at four hours of age, even earlier than the Mississippi child.

Eventually, the tests came back positive for HIV.

But by six days of age, the virus was undetectable.

"The remarkable thing about this particular baby is that the virus disappeared so quickly," said Bryson.

- Not a 'cure' yet -

The baby is still being treated with antiretroviral drugs, and researchers are cautious not to utter the world "cure" or even "remission" just yet.

Now aged 11 months, the child is doing well and continues to see doctors while under the care of a foster family.

She has "no detectable viral load, nothing since six days of age. That is the earliest ever," said Bryson.

Once she turns two, doctors may decide to stop suppressive therapy to see if she is in remission, or if the virus would rebound.

"The only way we would know if the baby is in remission is to stop therapy," explained Bryson.

Also at the conference, Deborah Persaud of Johns Hopkins University presented the latest on the Mississippi baby, who was given ART at 31 hours of age.

Now, the three-year-old is considered in remission from HIV, after drug treatment was stopped 21 months ago and no viral rebound has been observed.

Bryson said the Los Angeles team is optimistic that their baby will do just as well.

"The fact that it was a very fast reduction in the virus to undetectable levels makes us very hopeful that this baby might follow in the footsteps of the Mississippi which is still being followed," said Bryson.

"We are learning a lot now and it is exciting for the future."

There is no known cure for AIDS, which has infected some 70 million people around the world and killed 35 million, according to the World Health Organization.


Source: http://za.news.yahoo.com/second-us-b...000429874.html

[Prisoner Of Ice]

This is like the opening scene in idiocracy where the stupid guy who accidentally gets his nuts ripped off gets them reattached by a medical team led by the smart guy who never had any kids.

[portusaus]

I still believe the disease must be quarantined and taken very seriously.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

I still believe the disease must be quarantined and taken very seriously.

Agreed, "Berlin Patient" is a case when HIV virus is quarantined in tissues and couldn't called as first cured person from HIV.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

Might sound harsh but sometimes I think we ought to eliminate all primates in the wild. There's too many diseases that can spread out to humans, and each one seems worse than the last.

[Kazimiera]

I still believe the disease must be quarantined and taken very seriously.

I work in the health care sector in South Africa, which has the highest incidence of HIV in the world (if not, it's very close). It isn't airborne. I've had HIV exposure via needle stick twice, and once with a blood splash in the eye. I got anti-retrovirals for the two needlesticks, but they didn't consider the eye splash as high risk so I had to go without ARV's. Also, working with lots of blood, if you get it on your skin and there isn't a cut, you just wash it off and keep on working.

You don't just "acquire" HIV randomly, and it doesn't require quarantining.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Might sound harsh but sometimes I think we ought to eliminate all primates in the wild. There's too many diseases that can spread out to humans, and each one seems worse than the last.

This quote of yours deserve to go on absurd statements, my friend...And I'm about to place there.

[Steve-O]

Treatment is more profitable than vaccination. It figures that they are emphasizing on it. Maybe sometime in the future there will be a rash of HIV infection. This is just a solid investment in progress.

[Kazimiera]

Treatment is more profitable than vaccination. It figures that they are emphasizing on it. Maybe sometime in the future there will be a rash of HIV infection. This is just a solid investment in progress.

More profitable for the pharmaceutical companies and a huge expense for governments which have to buy this medication from them. I'm all for vaccinations. It costs a hell of a lot of money to keep someone going on ARV's for a lifetime.

[The Illyrian Warrior]

Treatment is more profitable than vaccination. It figures that they are emphasizing on it. Maybe sometime in the future there will be a rash of HIV infection. This is just a solid investment in progress.

Exactly this is primary reason or stumbling block why the cure still isn't available.