Finns 40-50% Y-DNA I

[Peikko]

What's more, this I1 population isn't accompanied by any reasonable amount of R1a and/or R1b which would strongly favor indo-european origins.
So they probably spoke some kind of a hunter-gatherer language, something uralic can't be excluded and is plausible.

You might want to rethink that.

An archaic (Northwest-)Indo-European language and a subsequently extinct Paleo-European language were likely spoken in what is now called Finland and Estonia, when the linguistic ancestors of the Finns and the Sami arrived in the eastern and northern Baltic Sea region from the Volga-Kama region probably at the beginning of the Bronze Age

https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/135714

[Guapo]

No surprise. I1-M253(true non-indo euros) should be considered a Scandinavian/Baltic haplogroup, not mainland celto-Germanic. Russians and Saami have more I1-M253 than Danes or Germans thanks to Swedish/Baltic Rus. Germans/Dutch/Belgians are mixed with more Celto-swarth R1b percentage and it shows, look at Van Persie and Van nistelrooy. R1a is predominant in Slavic Austria as well.

Notice also that Saami have around 50% I1

of course they do because it is Scandinavian in origin, not mainland celto-Germanic.

[Black Wolf]

No surprise. I1-M253(true non-indo euros) should be considered a Scandinavian/Baltic haplogroup, not mainland celto-Germanic. Russians and Saami have more I1-M253 than Danes or Germans thanks to Swedish/Baltic Rus. Germans/Dutch/Belgians are mixed with more Celto-swarth R1b percentage and it shows, look at Van Persie and Van nistelrooy. R1a is predominant in Slavic Austria as well.



of course they do because it is Scandinavian in origin, not mainland celto-Germanic.

We actually do not know where I1-M253 originated. It may have originated in Scandinavia but it could have just as easily originated in Eastern Europe. The Neolithic I1-M253 result from Hungary which was recently discovered may provide some clues. We need many more ancient samples first though before anything can be said for certain.

[Sawolainen]

mtDNA U5 is a western eurasian lineage. All European populations with higher frequencies N have higher Mongoloid admixture isn't this obvious? with exception of Turkish but they do have 4% N + 1.6% C3 + 0.16% O3 + 1.9% Q including 7.92% eastern eurasian mtDNA.


Finns have 100% Caucasoid mtDNA and yet you can have 7% to 9.3% Mongoloid DNA in average so it must be haplogroup N

You are a freakin' idiot. Lithuanians have 42% haplogroup N yet 0 East Asian/Siberian admixture. Why is that Einstein??

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...nVkM5M3c#gid=0

[Peterski]

We actually do not know where I1-M253 originated.

Now we maybe know - it is quite probable, that in Hungary (there the oldest I1 so far has been found, in the LBKT culture):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_Pottery_culture

[ButlerKing]

You are a freakin' idiot. Lithuanians have 42% haplogroup N yet 0 East Asian/Siberian admixture. Why is that Einstein??

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...nVkM5M3c#gid=0

You wish you dumb idiot. And besides last time I checked Lithuanians had only 27% N1c1 and that is related with Finland.

No surprise though since Lithuianians dominant number is R1a 44.9% . They are mixture of Slavic and Finland people whoe 65% haplogroup N have only have 6-15% Mongoloid admixture