0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 260 Given: 897 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,676 Given: 12,354 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 260 Given: 897 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,819 Given: 4,919 |
The foundation of feminism is true.
Feminism claims that men & women do not have equal rights. This is correct, but not as most people see. It actually is true that women have more rights than men, not less. Because all societies are premised upon a collection of women, not men. Men naturally are anti-social and individualistic, independent, compared to women. This is due to the nature of genders. Females are welcome and included into society/groups; males generally are excluded & unwanted. A male fights & competes for his (alpha) position within a group/society. Men who achieve top positions within society have a big target on themselves. Because other men are willing to fight, steal, and even kill for that top position. Inter-male competition ultimately leads to war, which breaks-out among humanity from era-to-era. Sometimes men become more willing to kill each-other over resources. Females are a natural resource (sex).
This is true; because men are willing to pay women for sex (prostitution). Prostitution is biological and rampant throughout the animal kingdom; many other species do this. Prostitution is heralded as "the oldest profession in history". I agree with this. It immediately and obviously proves that sex is a resource which most men are willing to pay, in order to have. With humanity though, the invention of contraception, abortion, and other birth-prevention techniques change the game and effectively removes humanity out of the animal kingdom. Contraception is the basis of social contrivance and "artificiality" opposed to naturalism. "Natural sex" results in expected birth of children.
(Prostitution cannot be equally compared with male-prostitution, the "gigolo", because male prostitutes only occur a small fraction of the time, and male prostitutes also tend to cater to homosexual men, and very ugly/undesirable women. So male-female prostitution is not "equal" at all.)
I disagree with many here, about "equal rights". I personally disfavor the idea of women & children in the military and combat. Consider this my personal opinion, you obviously are entitled to whatever opinions you enjoy. Women have more rights than men, not less, because of this fact. Women are privileged, protected, and secure, compared to men. This is a gender difference and "gender inequality".
Conclusion (TLDR):
I favor unequal rights. I support human inequality. People should not be equal. Because that means you ought to put your daughters into the military. I believe this is morally wrong and degenerate. People who want to put females into physical combat, around death & suffering, even causing women to murder others, is about the bottom of morality as you can get. It is the most immoral action. Therefore if you support "equal rights" based on gender then you support females in the military by definition. That is the result of "equal rights". Because rights are protections. Protections are privileges. And privilege is security.
Females should be more privileged and secure within society than males. I support this inequality. I support the "double-standards".
Last edited by Unome; 06-05-2014 at 07:54 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks