Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: CAUCASOID is the OLDEST and ORIGINAL strain of humanity! The First People:

  1. #21
    Ascended into a higher realm
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Mortimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:29 AM
    Ethnicity
    Southasian Hunter-Gatherer
    Ancestry
    Mixed - Multiracial - Multicultural
    Country
    Israel
    Region
    City of London
    Religion
    Christianity
    Age
    41
    Gender
    Posts
    87,074
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 58,204
    Given: 58,976

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neanderthal View Post
    Rubbish. They buried the dead, invented the first musical instruments and had much more advanced cave art for fucks sake. Just compare:

    Neanderthal:


    Now some cave paintings in Italy of Homo Retard... I mean, Sapiens:


    Do some research on real papers man, not biased programs for kids.
    i just read up on it, it says they didnt burried their dead symbolic. but there is evidence that they had some level of symbolic thought though you are right. i think you are glorifying them though, and they were much more primitive
    http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowl...avior-59267999
    My AncestryDNA autosomal results [yes it is a link click on it]

    Hm he has mastered chakra...can he do romjutsu... - Balkanforum user Floki
    then you must be some kind of wizzard who has lightning in his eyes - Balkanforum user Cobra about Mortimer
    Only a Sinti and Roma who has gained the power of the wheel can do it. - In conversation with the Balkanforum user Axer

  2. #22
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last Online
    06-08-2022 @ 08:26 AM
    Ethnicity
    .
    Country
    Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    3,263
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,868
    Given: 5,287

    5 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Lee View Post
    i dont believe that, because in science channel i saw that neanderthals were not even like humans from skull, they had heavier skulls and brow ridges etc. and they were physically stronger etc. also they werent creative because they never invented art or religion, i saw it on a science channel. is your source official science or a theory?
    Weren't creative?? Why don't you try to replicate the levallois knapping technique?

    Your giant breasts would be cut off and dried to hang as cave wall murals. Neanderthals clearly had higher visual intelligence than modern human beings. The way they view 3D objects was much more complex than human beings and allowed them to refine their tools to above-human levels.

    If i put some wild negro in a jungle with a UCLA professor, who do you think will triumph? The nigger. Does that mean he's more intelligent?? The reason neanderthals were extinct is because of their high intelligence, not low intelligence. As svipdag has stated before, intelligence is not evolutionarily advantageous. You don't need it to triumph in the wild. Modern human beings last about 36 hours max in the wilderness, if they're lost without anything. If intelligence was so advantageous they'd be surviving easily which doesn't happen.

    You can only survive 3 hours without warmth and 3 days without water. You have to hunt for food with primitive tools and then use the hide for warmth. You have to kill the animal yourself, it's not like you can domesticate a wolf to go and chase it down for you. These are hardly feats of high intelligence.

  3. #23
    Armchair Anthropologist Germaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Online
    12-08-2023 @ 03:29 AM
    Location
    Bayern
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Bayerischer Uradel
    Country
    Germany
    Region
    Bavaria
    Politics
    Traditionalist
    Gender
    Posts
    1,898
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,533
    Given: 1,371

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lehman Lifer View Post
    ALL of the Neanderthal skulls are Caucasoid [1]. The earliest Neanderthal skull (Saccopastore, Italy) is dated to OIS 5, or around 130,000 years old.[2] Its face was more gracile than most modern humans, possessing a luxurious height and thinness and remarkable hawk-like projection of the nose, with receding cheekbones (mid-facial prognathism). This individual appeared more evolved than most living people.



    A series of crania found at Mt. Carmel in Israel dated by thermoluminescence to 100,000 years consisted of a number of male and female skulls, associated with a preferential Levallois lithic industry, originally deemed anatomically modern humans, which have now been reclassified as purely Neanderthal.[3] The oldest amongst these skulls, and the most typical of its type, is designated Skhul IV. This individual has been classified as a Caucasoid.[4]







    From this time on, only Caucasoid skulls are known in Eurasia. The only skulls associated with the Perigordian industry in Europe are the Pestera cu Oase fragments and Saint-Cesaire 1, a Neanderthal. The Pestera cu Oase skull has been judged by Dr. Erik Trinkaus to be an intermediate between original Neanderthal and the current European population.[5] The Saint-Cesaire 1 Neanderthal is unusually gracile for a skull that sat atop a massive male post-skeleton. [6] All of these skulls belonged to Caucasian individuals and possessed typical Caucasian expressions of nasal morphology, masticatory systems and dentition, as well as shape of the cranium.

    The next skulls found in Europe are those of Pestera Muierii and Predmosti. Both the Pestera Muieri[7] and Predmosti[1][4] series are typically Caucasian and intermediate[1][4][7] between the original Neanderthals and the bulk of the living European population. In particular, Predmost #3 closely resembles the Saint-Cesaire #1 Neanderthal[8] and Skhul IV.[4][10]

    Note that by this time we have extended just in to the 20,000s B.C. and not a single Mongoloid, Australoid or Negroid skull has yet to be found. All of the people who lived up to this time were White Caucasoids of the Europeoid type. Though there were non-White predecessors living in Africa and Asia, such as Rhodesian Man and Homo Erectus, these do not appear to have been largely ancestral to Caucasoids, Negroids or Mongoloids, and, most importantly; they weren't people. They were sub-humanoid primates both anatomically and behaviorally speaking.

    The first Man was a Neanderthal male, originating in Europe approximately 130,000 years ago, who spread out to West Asia and the Levant and later to Uzbekistan and China. Based on evidence uncovered by Blane Ensor it appears that they also made it to what is now the southeastern United States.[11]

    The first non-White skulls begin to allegedly appear around the year 25,000 B.C. in Sicily, at Grimaldi. Here a series of small Negroid skeletons were found. Though they may have been reconstructed improperly it does appear that a Negroid of the Pygmid type had been dwelling in Sicily as early as the end of the Upper Paleolithic. There are no skulls or skeletons of this type in mainland Europe, nor any hybrids, and the series may be representative of a Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon type who has been subjected to epigenetic damage and perhaps islander dwarfism, and thus become Negroid.

    A skull dated to around 20,000 years, Chancelade 1, has been said to resemble Mongoloids. But this designation is most likely inappropriate, as "He was as European as the rest of the Upper Paleolithic people."[1] His slightly unique morphology may be a result of epigenetic damage, as we suspect all non-unequivocally Caucasian features to be.

    We have made it to the year 19,000 B.C. and not a single non-White skull has yet to be discovered in Asia, Africa or anywhere else. ALL of the living human beings who walked the face of the Earth at this time were White Men. The archaeological record during the period of 20,000-10,000 years is rather sparse, but it is during this time that incontrovertible evidence of non-White primates begin to appear in the fossil record. Many of them are associated with Caucasoids, and this is of utmost importance for consideration.

    In 1933 three skulls were found in the upper levels at Zhoukoudian cave in China. They are associated with a lithic industry of the European Perigordian type. The three skulls found date to the same period, and all three are of distinct racial morphology. The first skull, Upper Cave 101, an adult male, is metrically and morphologically almost a duplicate of Predmosti III and Saint-Cesaire 1, the western European Neanderthals. It also closely resembles Native American crania at Spirit Cave and Indian Knoll, and some Ainu crania. It is a Caucasoid.[12]

    The second skull, 102, is a female, and resembles the Yayoi Japanese.[12] It is a Mongoloid.

    Another skull, 103, resembles an Eskimo.[12]

    This series is of momentous importance for a number of reasons. First, it is complimented by genetic evidence[13] indicating that a race of White men conquered the indigenous people of eastern Asia. Second, it shows that the Mongoloid race was born around 20,000 years ago. Fourth, it sheds light on the peopling of the Americas. Fourth, Mongoloids are partly Caucasoid by parentage.



    Out-and-out Mongoloids do not become prevalent in eastern Asia until 9,000 years ago. Their ancestral homeland may lie in Australia or the Malay peninsula. It is unlikely that they are indigenous to Sibera as their features (flat noses and fore-aft thrust cheekbones, sinodonty, etc) are more likely a holdover from the condition of Rhodesian Man/Denisova. They are not cold adaptations.

    Siberia is likely near to the Caucasoid-Rhodesiensis interbreeding event which spawned modern Mongoloids (big brained humanoid primate).

    It is now time to explore the origin of the Australoid race. The Australoid race is no older that 6,000 years old, and there are no Australoid skulls in the fossil record of Australia or anywhere else which indicates that they existed prior to this. Genetics also confirms this.

    Australoids are often thought of as being a primeval race, due to their archaic appearance. The English word archaic is ultimately derived from the Greek arkhē, meaning "beginning." If in the fossil record there are no skulls resembling Australoids older than the time of the Sumerians, why then are they referred to as archaic? The simple fact of the matter is that they are not archaic. They are deformed.

    Australoids have had the misfortune of developing a widespread chromosomal disease that has given them their unusual features which, not coincidentally, resemble Hurler syndrome. This is epigenetic damage, the same thing which afflicted Rhodesiensis and which was probably transferred to Mongoloids and retained.

    Note the pitiful metric measurements of an Australoid skull compared to others in the above photographs.

    The oldest skull in Australia, Mungo Man, is dated to 40,000 years and does not resemble any Australoid. It has been determined by genetics research to be an entirely different species, and totally unrelated to living Australian Aboriginals.[14] The same thing has been said of the much younger Kow Swamp man. What we are looking at is an entirely different species of man which has been hitherto unrecognized by modern science, probably for the reason that their existence supports the multi-regional theory of human evolution, and refutes Out-of-Africa. Whether or not this race might be Denisova and thus partly ancestral to the Mongoloids is a question that ought to be rightly considered.

    No one knows where or when the Negroid race originated.[15] It was already mentioned previously that "Negroid" remains were found in Sicily and that they closely resemble the pygmies in size. This would imply that Negroids may have a European origin as there are no such remains found anywhere in Africa or anywhere else prior to 10,000 years ago. "Negroid", like Australoid and partly the Mongoloid may not in face be a "race" but a medical condition that the human body assumes when subjected to extreme amounts of epigentic damage brought about by outbreeding depression or exposure to a number of elements.

    We therefore rest our case that the Caucasoid race group as represented by Neanderthal man is the original and conditional stage of Mankind, that the Upper Paleoltithic European Caucasoids evolved out of that condition and that the entire continent of Eurasia from west to east is their domicile. Mongoloids partly descended from an admixture event involving this racial type and a separate species such as Rhodesian Man or Mungo Man. The Dinaric, Australoid and Negroid races are all suffering heavily from epigentic damage which has removed them from the original ancestral state of humanity, by shortening the length of their cranial vault severely and messing up the anatomy of their face and teeth and jaws, weakening and deforming them. Mongoloids have dual or even tripartite origins.


    [1] The Origin of Races, Alfed A. Knopf. inc. ISBN-10: 0394301420

    [2] Saccopastore 1: the earliest Neanderthal? A new look at an old cranium, ISBN 978-1-4020-5120-3

    [3] Metrical reconsideration of the Skhul IV and IX and Border Cave 1 crania in the context of modern human origins, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330870405

    [4] The stone age of Mount Carmel: Report of the Joint Expedition of the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem and the American School of Prehistoric Research, 1929-1934 ISBN-10: 0404166512

    [5] An early modern human from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania. 11231–11236, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2035108100

    [6] Continuity and Discontinuity in the Peopling of Europe, page 325 ISBN-10: 9400704917

    [7] Early modern humans from the Peştera Muierii, Baia de Fier, Romania 17196–17201, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608443103

    [8] Evolution or Extinction of Neandertals: A Brief History, Journal of Cosmology web-magazine Vol. 14, 2011 (Dr. Milford Wolpoff)

    [10] The Importanceof the Předmostí Human Fossils, Wolpoff and Frayer. Web communication.

    [11] Capps: A Levallois-like Prepared Core Technologyin the Southeastern United States, web communication.

    [12] The Races of Europe, ISBN-10: 0837163285



    [13] Upper Palaeolithic Siberian genome reveals dual ancestry of Native Americans Nature 505, 87–91 (02 January 2014) doi:10.1038/nature12736

    [14] Mitochondrial DNA sequences in ancient Australians: Implications for modern human origins PNAS 98 (2): 537–542. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.537

    [15] The Living Races of Man, Random House ISBN-10: 0394433726
    What about Africa? Was it first inhabited by Caucasians? I’ve seen a skull from 36000YBP from Southern Africa, the Hofmeyr skull that is way closer to Palaeolithic European skulls and North African Caucasid skulls than to any modern SSA skull.
    Quote Originally Posted by Colonel Frank Grimes View Post
    In the last couple of days at this forum I've been seeing these words all over. I come here to be racist and read pseudo-science outdated physical anthropology. I don't come hear to read angry-virgin-code-talk.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-05-2013, 12:46 AM
  2. Can original northern people be vegetarian?
    By Visitor_22 in forum Race and Society
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-14-2013, 05:52 PM
  3. Most non-Caucasoid people of Europe
    By ButlerKing in forum Anthropology
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: 03-17-2013, 02:07 AM
  4. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 09-03-2010, 12:02 PM
  5. Are Brown eyes an original Caucasoid trait?
    By John in Denver in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 06:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •