Are you a Homosexual? - Yes, No, Don't Know?

[Peachy Carnahan]

Let me have a quick check.

Do i own any Judy Garland albums....no
Do i have a "distressed" haircut.....no
Do i own a manbag.....no
Do i practise my high kicks at all hours.....no
Do i engage in anecdotal conversation and bitch about people who arent present....no
Do i like gin and tonic.....no
Do i own any flowered ankle socks....no


Looks like im a normal heterosexual....phew.

[Groenewolf]

Only get the romantic or sexual feeling for women, not men.

[Loddfafner]

If you want to compare yourself to a pine tree, you might want to specify the species.

[Puddle of Mudd]

I chose homosexual strictly in protest against those religious lunatics like the OP who think gays should somehow be punished for their sexual orientation -something that they have no control over.

[Svanhild]

I don't have any problem accepting you. But there's something else: 'The religious principle of sin and penance is an instrument of torture against anybody's self–determination.'

I don't see what that sentence has to do with the rest of your post. Nothing there prevents you being a Christian.

You're right, it hasn't much to do with the rest of my argumentation. It's meant as some kind of preemptive vindication against religious-orientated backtalks. I saw that The Papist started the thread and you never know what happens... Granted, unnecessary by tendency but not false by itself. The concept of sinning and atone for the sins is a religious one and has been often used against sexual deviants in the past...and today.

[Jarl]

It's simple. Who here at Apricity is a homosexual?

Regards,
The Papist.

Are the stakes ready? Bring me some tinder... let us see which one will sizzle more

[Tabiti]

I've always claimed women are more beautiful then men, especially in aesthetic point of view. I prefer to watch well formed naked female body then male muscles. Does that make me lesbian? I don't think so, since physical beauty is not the thing that attracts me in men. Homosexuality breaks the balance of female and male energies that form the world, imo, so from that point of view it is unnatural, therefore unhealthy behavior. However, the relationships between women have always been much more intimate then relationships between men. Some scientists claim that bisexual behavior is quite natural between females, maybe because our eternal search of sensibility, beauty and tenderness. I accept a more intimate relationship with female as something completely different from such with a male. Lesbians, for example, don't make a difference, since they completely exclude all possibilities for involving into sexual contact with males. This for me is the thin border between homosexual females and heterosexual (or bisexual) ones.

BTW, my man is mad about such statements made by myself and would accept any "left turn" from my side as a brutal infidelity, so sorry girls

[Anthropos]

You're right, it hasn't much to do with the rest of my argumentation. It's meant as some kind of preemptive vindication against religious-orientated backtalks. I saw that The Papist started the thread and you never know what happens... Granted, unnecessary by tendency but not false by itself. The concept of sinning and atone for the sins is a religious one and has been often used against sexual deviants in the past...and today.

That's the thing though... Pappy does not define what Christianity is. Neither do I, but I think I can say without risking too much that I am a little bit less assumptuous than he is. As for this:

"The concept of sinning and atone for the sins is a religious one and has been often used against sexuality (Svanhild said 'sexual deviants') in the past...and today."

I don't doubt it... but something that may not be so flattering for today's liberal-minded Europeans is that the overemphasis of sexuality, as well as the weird expressions of that in the religious context, appears above all to be a Western phenomenon. I know that tendencies of that sort existed in Catholicism, and it has reached a high in the Anglo-Saxon world especially. The obsession with sexuality manifests in various ways - as puritanism, freudianism and emancipation - and it is a typically Western European cultural phenomenon. That is not to say that Europeans are more sexual at face value though; only that the tendency towards 'neurotic' (borrowing from Freud) expressions of sexuality in culture are typically Western.

[Absinthe]

I've always claimed women are more beautiful then men, especially in aesthetic point of view. I prefer to watch well formed naked female body then male muscles.

Ditto. I don't think anyone denies that fact. Girls are prettier than boys.

I also prefer the sight of the female body, but when it comes to the actual act, so far I haven't been able to picture myself with anything else than a man (or a lesbian trapped in a male body )

BTW, my man is mad about such statements made by myself and would accept any "left turn" from my side as a brutal infidelity, so sorry girls

Oh, bummer!

[Loki]

... women are more beautiful then men, especially in aesthetic point of view.

I guess that's a matter of opinion and possibly sexual orientation.