Page 379 of 383 FirstFirst ... 279329369375376377378379380381382383 LastLast
Results 3,781 to 3,790 of 3822

Thread: Post unpopular opinions here

  1. #3781
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:40 AM
    Location
    A quiet town in the Hudson Valley
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Latin, Han
    Ethnicity
    Italian, 1/4 Chinese
    Ancestry
    Italian, a smidge of Croatian, a bit of English, a touch of Spanish and a quarter Chinese
    Country
    United States
    Y-DNA
    J L25
    mtDNA
    H20a
    Taxonomy
    Alpine Med
    Politics
    Paleoconservative
    Hero
    Benito Mussolini, Francisco Franco
    Age
    24
    Gender
    Posts
    2,679
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,577
    Given: 1,832

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesBond007 View Post
    That is why you lost the debate against me 'in everything anti-racists believe is a lie' ? I haven't check the thread since my last post in it but unless you pulled off some kind of last minute miracle you lost the debate. I tired of the debate because of your low IQ nigger rebutalls like to paraphrase :'Darwinism is false...explain peacock tailz and shiznit!'



    I am actually for the legalization of all drugs and for legal immigration of any race if they are high skilled. If drugs were legal there would be no violent illegal black market for it and no hispanic gangs that go along with it. I am for small government without big government it cannot enforce racial integration that violates the freedom of association clause in the constitution so racial problems would be solved by the virtual law of nature birds of a feather flock together and the odd bird that doesn't flock generally doesn't cause any problems; also, without big daddy government acting as a surrogate father for women then white women would be forced to get their act together with divorce rates dropping and birth rates likely climbing.

    I HATE BOTH LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES, and for one very simple reason: Both of them want to restrict personal freedom by criminalizing various types of behavior which, for all intents and purposes, harm no one except (possibly) those who engage in them.

    IN PARTICULAR, liberals want to take away my guns, my property rights, my home school, my cigarettes, my fast foods, my unapproved cancer cure, my Confederate flag, my white-pride sticker, my eagle feathers, my moment of silence, my gas-guzzler, and my big flush toilet.

    FURTHERMORE, they want to keep me from talking about (or making jokes about) certain racial or ethnic subjects, force me to race-mix, force me to treat people as equals whether I think they are or not, force me to mix with people who have weird diseases (and keep me from knowing who they are), keep me from getting a job or promotion so that somebody with a different hue or sex behavior can get it, appropriate my tax money for their charities and social engineering schemes, and force me to send my kids to schools I wouldn't send a dog to in order to be indoctrinated in beliefs which are totally opposed to my own.

    LIKEWISE, conservatives want to take away my dope, my rock'n'roll, my dirty pictures, my birth-control devices, my abortion doctor, my morning-after pills, my union card, my Harry Potter and evil-lution books, my flag-burning kit, my Third-World friends, my illegitimate kids, and my polygamous wives.

    FURTHERMORE, they wish to keep me from engaging in certain forms of intimate behavior in the privacy of my own bedroom, force me to put my life at risk -- and use my taxes for -- various acts of military adventurism and political power-seeking that I do not agree with, and require me to make reverent noises toward various brands of religion that I may or may not happen to believe in.

    AND WHAT IS MORE, both liberals AND conservatives want to tax away my bank account, snoop away my privacy, burn my anti-government literature, and terminate my unfiltered Internet connection.

    THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS: The division between liberals and conservatives is just a trap. It's a trap because when we get mad at one of them for taking away one kind of freedom, then we elect the other, who then proceeds to take away another kind of freedom. It is time we recognize that there is no real difference between liberals and conservatives in the way they behave -- they both want to do away with individual freedom so they can rule as they please.

    IN CONTRAST to liberals and conservatives, there is one group which supports freedom wholeheartedly -- the libertarians. Isn't it about time we started supporting them?

    While we hear much talk of "conspiracy theories" or "fake news" these days, we hear no talk at all of a phenomenon which may turn out to be the biggest conspiracy of all time, namely, the artificial division of people into the two false categories of "liberal" and "conservative". This can best be explained by observing that, while there are many political issues on which people disagree, the one fundamental difference in political beliefs is between the belief in maximization of individual liberty and the belief in maximization of government power. These are opposites since the more liberty the individual has, the less the government can possess, while the more power (or "liberty") the government possesses, the less liberty the individual can have. The reason, then, that I say the liberal/conservative dichotomy is a false one is that both liberals and conservatives are inconsistent in their attitudes toward individual liberty vs government power. For example, the liberals want to use government power to control economic enterprises and property via government regulation (the EEOC, OSHA, and the Endangered Species Act are examples of such regulation), while conservatives usually reject such regulation; but liberals reject government regulation over such things as abortion, drug use and pornography, while conservatives strongly desire such regulation.

    So why, then, do I call the liberal/conservative dichotomy a conspiracy or possible conspiracy? Simply because the major media behave as if there is a fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives when there is none (the difference is merely over issues having no logical relationship), but ignore as much as possible the one real political issue, which is approval of Big Government versus the disapproval of it. And of course the Establishment -- which includes both the major media and Big Government -- profits from the fact that people are confused by the liberal/conservative dichotomy, since such confusion reduces the chance that Establishment power will be challenged in any significant way. And it also means that, while "conservatives" will oppose "liberals" over using government power for liberal interests, and "liberals" will oppose "conservatives" over using government power for conservative interests, the net result is to leave the government with enormous power which is used sometimes for "liberal" interests and sometimes for "conservative" interests, but is always used for government interests.

    So how, then, can we begin to unravel the confusion over "liberal" versus "conservative"? The best way, I think, is to put the issues in terms of property rights. The drug issue is a good one to start with in this case, because it is clear that, if one can be said to own anything, he must surely be said to own his own body, and thus -- providing he does not hurt others -- he must surely have the right to do with his body what he wishes, including taking "unapproved" drugs, whether for health reasons or for recreation. The alternative to this view, of course, is that the government owns your body, in which case it is up to the government to tell you what you may put in it. It is of course worthy of note -- and representative of how much confusion the Establishment has sown -- to realize how many "conservatives" seem to think people own their own bodies when it comes to nutritional supplements, but reject this notion when it comes to recreational drugs.

    Another concept which is greatly clarified by the concept of property rights is children's rights, and particularly abortion. In particular, liberals usually uphold the idea that children are government property when it comes to "child abuse", truancy laws, child labor laws and the like, since they believe the government has the right to enforce such laws; but they do a complete about-face in the case of abortion, where they regard unborn children as the property of the parents, who can abort or not as they desire. Conservatives, of course, are equally inconsistent: While rejecting the notion of government ownership of children in such instances as home schooling, parental discipline and child labor, they are perfectly happy to permit the government to hold property rights in the case of a fetus, and in particular they insist that the government must protect "its" property against a mother intent on abortion.

    But the concept of property rights is applicable to many more issues than the above, including four which have usually occupied center-stage in recent political debates: immigration, integration, pornography and free speech. In the case of immigration, as Hans-Hermann Hoppe has noted ("Free Immigration or Forced Integration", Chronicles, July 1995), if our country had a king instead of a president -- ie, if the country were "owned" by a king rather than "rented" by a president -- then the king would wish to keep up the property value of his country by admitting as citizens only those with good skills and high intelligence, while in our present system, the president is usually happy to let in the riffraff and give them welfare because these folks will be likely to vote him and his party back into office. Alternately, if there were no government at all, but merely owners of private property, immigration would not occur at all unless a property owner admitted immigrants to his own piece of land for purposes which profited him personally, and thus no one would be admitted who was doing the nation (or "nation") any damage.

    As to property rights and racial integration, we note that this issue was first raised in the case of public schools and busses, ie, government property. If there were no government schools or busses, however, the "problem" of integration would not have arisen (We assume here that private ownership means no government regulation, since regulatory power implies at least partial ownership). Since the 1950s, however, the issue of integration has spread to businesses, colleges and many other places because of the fact that government has assumed the power to "regulate", ie, because government has assumed (partial) ownership of almost everything. All of which means that, if the government had followed the intent of the Constitution and respected private property, the whole integration mess would never have happened.

    Two other issues which bear on private property are pornography and free speech. As to porn, this is obviously related to the ownership of one's body, since those who expose themselves for the camera are exercising property rights; and those who sell pictures of such people are again exercising property rights. As to free speech, this, too, is primarily a property-rights matter: If the transmission of speech occurs on private property, or if it occurs in publications or transmissions which are sold to consumers, then it is clearly protected by the rights of property owners and consumers; while if it occurs on public streets or other (publicly- owned or regulated) media, then it becomes subject to government censorship because government (partially) owns those media. Thus if private property rights were respected, the need for free speech "guarantees" would be unnecessary.

    But if we are right that there has been a conspiracy to confuse the electorate about the fundamental political issue of government power versus individual liberty, we can see from the above discussion that there has at the same time been a conspiracy to confuse people about the concept of property rights, since the act of government regulation impacts on such rights so as to make ownership increasingly meaningless. And while it is certain that there will always be differences of opinion as to how much power the government should possess, the citizens should never forget that government power is the fundamental issue of all politics, and that property rights constitute the basis of individual liberty and are thus the principal bulwark against abuse of government power.
    Bro, abortion is evil and polygamy is wrong.

  2. #3782
    Curaca Incal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Online
    Today @ 03:01 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Exotic Med
    Ethnicity
    Racial Tragedy
    Country
    Peru
    Politics
    Xenelasia
    Religion
    Chinas con Culo
    Gender
    Posts
    19,521
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14,278
    Given: 10,304

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by capocannoniere View Post
    I agree that the idea of sexualizing women as something bad is childish. It surely can be out of place and disrespectful in many cases, but the appreciation of female beauty is omnipresent in all of humanity. Nothing in the Western world forbids a woman from not using makeup and wearing plain dress, yet even now that they are part of the workforce, they know very well that fertility is still their main power and spend hours and a lot of money on reinforcing it.

    And unless you're a weird voyeur, you can't appreciate it just through looking at it .
    Nowadays all problems are intended to be treated in a very simplistic, cause/effect way where the result WILL ALWAYS and invariantly be the same: So, if you sexualize women (whatever that means) then you are a potential rapist, a while ago there was a crusade against videogames because some weirdo who played all day was involved in a shooting so ALL videogame players were potential shooters, there is a documentary (on Netflix I think) about some kids who were accused of murder because they listened to metal so ALL metalheads worshipped Satan and were mass murderers (maybe you know the story better than me).

  3. #3783
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Richmondbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 AM
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic, Germanic, Anglo, Baltic
    Ethnicity
    English, French, Irish, Scottish, German, Distant American Indian
    Ancestry
    Mother's Side: Colonial Virginia. Fathers Side: German/Lithuania early 1900s.
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Virginia
    Y-DNA
    R-M417
    mtDNA
    H
    Taxonomy
    Alpine-Atlantid-CM
    Politics
    Paleo Conservative
    Hero
    General Lee
    Religion
    Christian Protestant
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Gender
    Posts
    14,908
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,960
    Given: 9,268

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Adele is horrible

    Sent from my F91 5G using Tapatalk

  4. #3784
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:41 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic Celtic Romance
    Ethnicity
    Central/Northwestern Euro
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    6,043
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,349
    Given: 202

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Adele has a magnificent voice. Don't care for some her woke virtue signaling vids, however.

  5. #3785
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Richmondbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 AM
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic, Germanic, Anglo, Baltic
    Ethnicity
    English, French, Irish, Scottish, German, Distant American Indian
    Ancestry
    Mother's Side: Colonial Virginia. Fathers Side: German/Lithuania early 1900s.
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Virginia
    Y-DNA
    R-M417
    mtDNA
    H
    Taxonomy
    Alpine-Atlantid-CM
    Politics
    Paleo Conservative
    Hero
    General Lee
    Religion
    Christian Protestant
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Gender
    Posts
    14,908
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,960
    Given: 9,268

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NSXD60 View Post
    Adele has a magnificent voice. Don't care for some her woke virtue signaling vids, however.
    If you like caterwauling



    Sent from my F91 5G using Tapatalk

  6. #3786
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Richmondbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 AM
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic, Germanic, Anglo, Baltic
    Ethnicity
    English, French, Irish, Scottish, German, Distant American Indian
    Ancestry
    Mother's Side: Colonial Virginia. Fathers Side: German/Lithuania early 1900s.
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Virginia
    Y-DNA
    R-M417
    mtDNA
    H
    Taxonomy
    Alpine-Atlantid-CM
    Politics
    Paleo Conservative
    Hero
    General Lee
    Religion
    Christian Protestant
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Gender
    Posts
    14,908
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,960
    Given: 9,268

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    There is no right /wrong side of history.

    Sent from my F91 5G using Tapatalk

  7. #3787
    Senior Member HectorOfTroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:20 AM
    Location
    Canada
    Meta-Ethnicity
    ANE descendant
    Ethnicity
    Latin American, pred European
    Ancestry
    1/3 EEF, 1/3 European and Caucasian Hunter, 1/3 Amerind
    Country
    Canada
    Y-DNA
    R1b (Iberian/Spanish branch)
    mtDNA
    R0
    Politics
    small government
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    563
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 319
    Given: 323

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Metal is a cringe genre

  8. #3788
    aguante el pincha
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    capocannoniere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Polentic
    Ethnicity
    Colono (4th Generation Italian-Brazilian)
    Ancestry
    100% Northeastern Italian
    Country
    Brazil
    Region
    Veneto
    Taxonomy
    Atlantid or Dinaro/Alpinid
    Politics
    Unaboomer
    Hero
    Germano Mosconi
    Religion
    Estudiantes de la Plata and Vasco da Gama
    Gender
    Posts
    1,258
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,037
    Given: 947

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HectorOfTroy View Post
    Metal is a cringe genre
    What have you been listening to from it?
    Spoiler!

    Hilderaldo Lus Bellini. Son of Italian immigrants, Vasco da Gama player, first Brazilian to ever lift the World Cup.
    "Coion el ozel chel ga s-chifo del so nido" (Stupid is the bird who despises its own nest)

  9. #3789
    Senior Member HectorOfTroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:20 AM
    Location
    Canada
    Meta-Ethnicity
    ANE descendant
    Ethnicity
    Latin American, pred European
    Ancestry
    1/3 EEF, 1/3 European and Caucasian Hunter, 1/3 Amerind
    Country
    Canada
    Y-DNA
    R1b (Iberian/Spanish branch)
    mtDNA
    R0
    Politics
    small government
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    563
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 319
    Given: 323

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by capocannoniere View Post
    What have you been listening to from it?
    heavy metal I meant

  10. #3790
    aguante el pincha
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    capocannoniere's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Polentic
    Ethnicity
    Colono (4th Generation Italian-Brazilian)
    Ancestry
    100% Northeastern Italian
    Country
    Brazil
    Region
    Veneto
    Taxonomy
    Atlantid or Dinaro/Alpinid
    Politics
    Unaboomer
    Hero
    Germano Mosconi
    Religion
    Estudiantes de la Plata and Vasco da Gama
    Gender
    Posts
    1,258
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,037
    Given: 947

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HectorOfTroy View Post
    heavy metal I meant
    What bands?
    Spoiler!

    Hilderaldo Lus Bellini. Son of Italian immigrants, Vasco da Gama player, first Brazilian to ever lift the World Cup.
    "Coion el ozel chel ga s-chifo del so nido" (Stupid is the bird who despises its own nest)

Page 379 of 383 FirstFirst ... 279329369375376377378379380381382383 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Post an unpopular opinion you hold
    By TheBlondeSalad in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 162
    Last Post: 04-04-2020, 06:03 PM
  2. Post Controversial Opinions.
    By Caismeachd in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 232
    Last Post: 03-10-2020, 03:55 AM
  3. Barack Obama: the most unpopular man in Britain?
    By Bloodeagle in forum United Kingdom
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-19-2010, 04:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •