NATO intends to prohibit Russia’s and China’s Development

[Sir_Kat]

The Confederacy should have won and prevented all of this....

[Ars Moriendi]

Because expanding defensive alliances and strenghtening the army in NATO is not a result of Russian agression and anexation of another country's teritory, that is just evil plan to beat on innocent Russia.
What do defences bother Russia unless they plan to attack them?

Everything is a result of western pigs imperialism. They just give some money and shit starts.
It could never be a complicated issue?
Simple minds seek simple solutions.
And slavs of Russia are perfect examples of scaremongering and simple solutions.

NATO has never been a defensive alliance, and the Russian/Ukrainian dossier is only a part of the analysis made by the essay. In comparative terms, the resources allocated to Asia, and even to Africa, are more important than those NATO kas kept in Eastern Europe.

Meyssan has a point when he states that the events in Georgia 2008, and Ukraine 2014, have highlighted the problem that Russia is for the American and British power structure. That's why they still have to organize symbolic meetings in Estonia (like Obama did last week), or deploy moderate-sized brigades in Poland. Still, does't change the fact that the core of the naval and air power of NATO has been relocated to the Indian and Pacific Ocean. Mostly in two blocs, from the Horn of Africa (Somalia) till the Persian Gulf. And from Vietnam till Hawai, including presence in Taiwan and Okinawa.

[RandoBloom]

NATO has never been a defensive alliance, and the Russian/Ukrainian dossier is only a part of the analysis made by the essay. In comparative terms, the resources allocated to Asia, and even to Africa, are more important than those NATO kas kept in Eastern Europe.

Meyssan has a point when he states that the events in Georgia 2008, and Ukraine 2014, have highlighted the problem that Russia is for the American and British power structure. That's why they still have to organize symbolic meetings in Estonia (like Obama did last week), or deploy moderate-sized brigades in Poland. Still, does't change the fact that the core of the naval and air power of NATO has been relocated to the Indian and Pacific Ocean. Mostly in two blocs, from the Horn of Africa (Somalia) till the Persian Gulf. And from Vietnam till Hawai, including presence in Taiwan and Okinawa.

And that is why they nuked Russia to the ashes.
Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine, all acts of Russian agression.
Which should have been punished with total embargo of all Russian goods and produce, as well as with deployment of peacekeeper troops in Russian teritory

[Rudel]

Because expanding defensive alliances and strenghtening the army in NATO is not a result of Russian agression and anexation of another country's teritory, that is just evil plan to beat on innocent Russia.
What do defences bother Russia unless they plan to attack them.

People simply don't like having "defensive" systems pointed at them. It's fairly easy to see the US has been trying to cockblock Russia every step of the way since WW2 as to where the European peninsula is concerned.
Shit, I myself don't feel safe at all being surrounded by American "defences" planted among our neighbours. Especially since they have the ability to use atomic weapons locally stocked at their own discretion if the US gives its say-so.

[RandoBloom]

People simply don't like having "defensive" systems pointed at them. It's fairly easy to see the US has been trying to cockblock Russia every step of the way since WW2 as to where the European peninsula is concerned.
Shit, I myself don't feel safe at all being surrounded by American "defences" planted among our neighbours. Especially since they have the ability to use atomic weapons locally stocked at their own discretion if the US gives its say-so.

Walls and towers never hurt anyone except those attacking them.
Simple as that.
As much as Russia hates encountering defenses in the areas they would anex, so do people Russia wants to anex hate being invaded.

[Ars Moriendi]

And that is why they nuked Russia to the ashes.
Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine, all acts of Russian agression.
Which should have been punished with total embargo of all Russian goods and produce, as well as with deployment of peacekeeper troops in Russian teritory

I don't know what you're talking about. Russia was never attacked with nuclear weapons.
Georgia and Ukraine were countries that had a reduced intervention following an anti-Russian event (Saakashvili's threat to join NATO and host bases right next to the Russian border, and the Euromaidan coup that brought forth an anti-Russian pro-EU/pro-NATO junta).
Russia has already been sanctioned, last week Brussels increased the blockade against Russia.
Russia has no civil war or internal strife going on in its territory, which is a pre-requisite to the deployment of blue helmets anywhere in the world.

[RandoBloom]

I don't know what you're talking about. Russia was never attacked with nuclear weapons.
Georgia and Ukraine were countries that had a reduced intervention following an anti-Russian event (Saakashvili's threat to join NATO and host bases right next to the Russian border, and the Euromaidan coup that brought forth an anti-Russian pro-EU/pro-NATO junta).
Russia has already been sanctioned, last week Brussels increased the blockade against Russia.
Russia has no civil war or internal strife going on in its territory, which is a pre-requisite to the deployment of blue helmets anywhere in the world.

Your NATO Agressive alliance had a 10 year advantage in possession of Nuclear weapons over Russia.
And opposite to what agressors do, not only did they not attack Russia conventionaly, but inconventionaly too.

So every time a country that Russia thinks should Serve Russia, decides not to do so they get invaded?
And NATO is the agressor?
Only Russia has a right to its own foreign policy. Everyone else obeys Russia.
Tzar - Tzardom - Orthodoxy logic of 19th century in action 2 centuries later

[StormBringer]

Only Russia has a right to its own foreign policy.

Yes, now go cry about the fact Bosnia is not an Austrian protectorate and your name is not Hans.

[Ars Moriendi]

Your NATO Agressive alliance had a 10 year advantage in possession of Nuclear weapons over Russia.
And opposite to what agressors do, not only did they not attack Russia conventionaly, but inconventionaly too.

The US acquired the atomic bomb in 1945. The USSR did the same thing in 1949. NATO had only a couple years of existence by then, and the whole Western arsenal was very reduced to say the least, considering how neither the UK nor France had yet acquired nuclear material.

Attacking the USSR with nuclear bombs before 1949 was completely implausible for the US seeing as they would have been unable to establish any sort of stability in Eurasia (The agreement in Yalta was made prior to the end of the War even). That is of course skipping the technical problems they had during the 40s, when the US barely managed to collect enough Uranium 235 and Plutonium for the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs respectively.

So every time a country that Russia thinks should Serve Russia, decides not to do so they get invaded?
And NATO is the agressor?
Only Russia has a right to its own foreign policy. Everyone else obeys Russia.
Tzar - Tzardom - Orthodoxy logic of 19th century in action 2 centuries later

People don't like aggresive and hostile neighbours. Sometimes even an economic rivalry is enough. The Brits declared war on their perpetual lapdogs, the Dutch, several times for purely commercial reasons, even though they had no real political or ideological problems.

The fact most European nations no longer have an independent foreign policy, doesn't give them the moral high ground to criticise countries that still do. If anything, it's somehow pitiful.

[RandoBloom]

Yes, now go cry about the fact Bosnia is not an Austrian protectorate and your name is not Hans.

You are the one desiring that, since you consider superpowers should have power to make protectorates.
Nothing suprising from a Serb.
Why are you so butthurt over people wanting every country to make its own politics, rather than invade others'