0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,787 Given: 3,908 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,110 Given: 363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,783 Given: 2,629 |
Humans are not machines that you call the assistant service if it doesn't come as you ordered to get a new one conform your wishes. People feel too entitled, you're not entitled to have a healthy son or a son with specific characteristics, if your son is born with an illness or gets sick that's what you gonna have to take.
Your whole position is based on how the parents feel when they foresee the efforts they are going to have to do, not if the fetus is worthy of being protect or not because of his nature, this is egoistic because you evaluate people according to your own interest. If someone felt the same way about having an autistic child as you do about having a crippled because his standards are different, and are not willing to put on the minimal effort on raising an autistic child, how could you argue they shouldn't abort believing what you do?
Afterall, if you think that crippled fetuses are not human, then you must believe all fetuses are not human, because it is not being crippled that makes someone non-human.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,110 Given: 363 |
I never insinuated that crippled fetuses were non human. It's pretty heartless of introducing into the world when they're going to suffer mostly and have a limited life. Who'd want a son who's going to live a limited life with you? It's not a selfish thing. If I did have a child with terrible defects, oh well, sucks to suck. It's my duty to care for him, time to live a long life and spending soo much funds on to him/her and living as a parent with many limits. And not just that, the kid too will suffer. I should've added how the kid would live a limited life, not only just how it wouldn't benefit the parents. This is only directed at fetuses who have TERRIBLE defects and are not going to be an easy time taking care of. I don't believe in unnecessary abortion against small types of illnesses. If the child has a terrible case of autism, then is guess the yes have to decide to abort it or choose to live a life with limits.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,884 Given: 1,005 |
You missed my point. If Steinmetz had not been allowed to live and mature to adulthood, we would have been denied his important contributions, the potential for which could not have been determined, or even surmised, prenatally. It is impossible to determine what ANY fetus, normal or deformed will develop into. This fact ought to be borne seriously in mind before playing God.
"This is not my time; this is not my world; these are not my people." - Martin H. Francis
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,110 Given: 363 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,110 Given: 363 |
Who knows? Their lives aren't objectively determined before birth or known what they're going to do. Most likely they are going to live limited lives and suffer. Those type of people are very rare though. Just because there's a guy with Down's syndrome who lives a very normal life doesn't mean we should go against the anortion over one person. It's just he tried his very best to live a life like ours.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,170 Given: 1,831 |
You say you want healthy children so that they would take care of you. Your healthy children may as well decide they don't want to take care of their mentally and/or physically disabled father, if you happen to be one. You see, you don't know what kind of children you might have just like you don't know what will be left out of you when you're old. You can make a choice, so can your children.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,110 Given: 363 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks