Page 21 of 21 FirstFirst ... 111718192021
Results 201 to 205 of 205

Thread: Sexual lifestyles?

  1. #201
    Companhia dos Leőes da Beira
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Romance
    Ethnicity
    Portuguese
    Country
    Portugal
    Y-DNA
    R1b-L21
    mtDNA
    H15
    Religion
    Cultural Christian
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Gender
    Posts
    18,438
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24,184
    Given: 16,906

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vjatych View Post
    Not true. Arabs, Muslims have always been a developed civilization. The decline of Arab civilization occurred under the pressure of Rome, and then the transgender West. The Mongol-Tatars at the time of their existence were a very developed and tolerant nation. They were cruel - at the level of the entire Middle Ages...but they have never infringed on the rights of the Orthodox. They were very tolerant of Orthodoxy, as well as various nationalities, races and religions. Isn't that true humanity? You again do not know anything and begin to assert something authoritatively.
    Define Arabs, which ones are you referring to? Those who live well today simply by chance of having found oil in the Persian Gulf were still living in tents like gypsies not even a hundred years ago.

    The Mongols being a civilization is very dubious. Tell me which language, architecture, infrastructure, technological advancements, literature, regulations, agricultural systems and so on did they left in Russia that can be witnessed today? You loving the Mongols does not mean that there was a Mongol civilization.
    YDNA: R1b-L21 > DF13 > S1051 > FGC17906 > FGC17907 > FGC17866


  2. #202
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2023
    Last Online
    02-12-2024 @ 01:33 PM
    Ethnicity
    Y-DNA University
    Country
    Antarctica
    Region
    Alaska
    Y-DNA
    R-S1194
    mtDNA
    T2c1d1
    Religion
    Islam
    Gender
    Posts
    213
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 250
    Given: 32

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas View Post
    The Mongol Horde being a successful civilization is nonsense, calling it a civilization is even highly debatable. It was a successful war machine. The Romans were monogamous, they had one spouse through marriage (having extramarital affairs does not mean it was a polygamous society). Muslims are successful when contrasted with what is the worst time in European history, the Dark Ages. They have stagnated until the present day and continue to live in the Middle Ages when it comes to political and civic rights
    Extramarital affaires counts as polygamy, matter of fact you do it behind your wives back and takes more effort into it. There’s absolutely no debate about this.
    Romans weren’t monogamous in absolutely no shape or form. For Muslim empires you say it coincides with the Dark ages of Europe, you keep finding excuses to deny that there was no monogamous civilization.

    Speak for yourself.
    I don’t speak for me but for people who criticize having 4 wives yet most have secret partners, it’s polygamy in an unhealthy way

    You also don't realize that having concubines, prostitutes or extramarital affairs is not the same as being polygamous. Being polygamous means marrying multiple spouses and at least in Europe I can not think of any Christian ruler who married several women simultaneously without divorcing first
    .

    No, no, no. You’re wrong if you keep claiming that having multiple partners behind your wives back isn’t polygamy. It’s normal for men to have desire of multiple women and studies show that men with multiple wives have higher testosterone. Historical wise you have Genghis Khan who had 1000 kids and had a big empire, when he died the empire was big, your talking about his descendants when you claim it was short lived but even with that it’s just an exemple of one of the big empires who were polygamous. Ottomans lasted a millennium but they’re in the Muslim empire category

  3. #203
    Companhia dos Leőes da Beira
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Brás Garcia de Mascarenhas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Romance
    Ethnicity
    Portuguese
    Country
    Portugal
    Y-DNA
    R1b-L21
    mtDNA
    H15
    Religion
    Cultural Christian
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Gender
    Posts
    18,438
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24,184
    Given: 16,906

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Touijer View Post
    Extramarital affaires counts as polygamy, matter of fact you do it behind your wives back and takes more effort into it. There’s absolutely no debate about this.
    Romans weren’t monogamous in absolutely no shape or form. For Muslim empires you say it coincides with the Dark ages of Europe, you keep finding excuses to deny that there was no monogamous civilization.



    I don’t speak for me but for people who criticize having 4 wives yet most have secret partners, it’s polygamy in an unhealthy way

    .

    No, no, no. You’re wrong if you keep claiming that having multiple partners behind your wives back isn’t polygamy. It’s normal for men to have desire of multiple women and studies show that men with multiple wives have higher testosterone. Historical wise you have Genghis Khan who had 1000 kids and had a big empire, when he died the empire was big, your talking about his descendants
    I'm not going to have this debate with you if you do not even know what polygamy is. You think that adultery is the same when it is not. Learn the meaning of the terms you employ before you make a fool of yourself.
    YDNA: R1b-L21 > DF13 > S1051 > FGC17906 > FGC17907 > FGC17866


  4. #204
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Vessna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Last Online
    Today @ 09:40 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Balto-Slavic
    Ethnicity
    American
    Ancestry
    Swamps
    Country
    Antarctica
    Region
    Pennsylvania
    mtDNA
    H1c
    Hero
    sprinkle sprinkle
    Gender
    Posts
    1,901
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,087
    Given: 1,175

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Touijer View Post
    Extramarital affaires counts as polygamy, matter of fact you do it behind your wives back and takes more effort into it. There’s absolutely no debate about this.
    Romans weren’t monogamous in absolutely no shape or form. For Muslim empires you say it coincides with the Dark ages of Europe, you keep finding excuses to deny that there was no monogamous civilization.



    I don’t speak for me but for people who criticize having 4 wives yet most have secret partners, it’s polygamy in an unhealthy way

    .

    No, no, no. You’re wrong if you keep claiming that having multiple partners behind your wives back isn’t polygamy. It’s normal for men to have desire of multiple women and studies show that men with multiple wives have higher testosterone. Historical wise you have Genghis Khan who had 1000 kids and had a big empire, when he died the empire was big, your talking about his descendants when you claim it was short lived but even with that it’s just an exemple of one of the big empires who were polygamous. Ottomans lasted a millennium but they’re in the Muslim empire category
    Developed world favors monogamy, whether you agree with it or not. Extramarital affairs are not illegal in developed countries, polygamy- having multiple spouses males or females - is illegal. An affair could land you in a court in a divorce process and would give your cheated spouse the right to sue your ass for alimony and all your assets. Polygamy can land you a prison term.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. #205
    Curaca Incal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Online
    Today @ 09:59 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Exotic Med
    Ethnicity
    Racial Tragedy
    Country
    Peru
    Politics
    Xenelasia
    Religion
    Chinas con Culo
    Gender
    Posts
    26,658
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 18,478
    Given: 13,192

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lutiferre View Post
    So what are your sexual lifestyles?

    Monogamy - one partner only for all of life?

    Serial monogamy - one partner only, for limited periods? How limited? Extremely short relationships, which are mostly sexual? Or longer relationships?

    Polygamy - several partners for all life?

    Serial polygamy - several different partners for several different periods?

    Pure promiscuity/libertinism - no permanent limits, just whatever you feel like?

    What are the benefits/disadvantages of these different styles? Why choose one over the other?

    Do you even question how you live? Why not?
    Serial polygamy at least in practice because women don't fuck here lol

Page 21 of 21 FirstFirst ... 111718192021

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •