Please tick which of the following should be legalised

[Seraph of the End]

Euthanasia and abortion on demand (only in some special cases tho. Other than that it's a huge problem)

[Minesweeper]

Prostitution, euthanasia and guns. Those are only categories that deserve unconditional legalization. Some deserve conditional and some are disgusting and should remain illegal forever.

[Merida]

- Marijuana; there's a whole unnecessary business behind it. Although I wouldn't apply it to other drugs.
- Prostitution.
- Euthanasia.
- Abortion on demand; in some cases, and it should also be accompanied by education.

[alfieb]

Drugs, prostitution, guns, violent porn.

[Melina]

The drug that should be legalized is DMT (Dimethyltryptamine). But I highly doubt it ever will since it would make the people stronger, less frightened, more intelligent and probably less submissive. Ridiculous you get 40 years to life for this. Yet it isn't addictive. Here they put it as a "class A drug". Yet it isn't a "drug". It is a natural substance found in all life forms.

Guns should be legalized to prevent tyranny.

Euthanasia should also be legal. I don't get the hype for trying to keep severely ill individuals alive when they wish to die of excruciating pain.

[Argonian]

Shouting 'fire' where there is none. Really damn good way to get an afternoon off work.

[Dandelion]

A great 'but' on the drugs. Heroine or meth of course should remain illegal. However, marijuana, while harmful should be legal. I also left out 'violent pornography', but actually I think it should be legal as long as it's fake (I still think 'rape porn' is too disgusting to tick that option).
And then there is incest. I neither dared ticking that one. I am personally against it.

However, I think it should be legal just be shunned. I don't care if there's consensual incest between two people, as long as they know it's not healthy to reproduce with one another and that they realise their relationship will be frowned upon.

[alfieb]

Doctors are supposed to save lives. They take an oath not to do the reverse.

If someone wants to "pull the plug" so to speak, then it should be a relative of the patient, and not a healthcare professional. Doctor-assisted suicide and state-endorsed killing (capital punishment) are both things that make me very uncomfortable.

Once you introduce the responsibility to a doctor that they should kill you if you're in pain, you're changing the dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship and turning it on its head.

[Dandelion]

Oh yeah, I also think euthanasia should be an option for those who are in extreme suffering. It should be regulated by doctors though and both the physician as the patient must agree. This is however quite complicated with Alzheimer patients who give consent before it gets too advanced, usually not enough to warrant euthanasia.

[Tooting Carmen]

Doctors are supposed to save lives. They take an oath not to do the reverse.

If someone wants to "pull the plug" so to speak, then it should be a relative of the patient, and not a healthcare professional. Doctor-assisted suicide and state-endorsed killing (capital punishment) are both things that make me very uncomfortable.

Once you introduce the responsibility to a doctor that they should kill you if you're in pain, you're changing the dynamics of the doctor-patient relationship and turning it on its head.

But if the patient has an irreversible illness and asks for it, why should the doctor risk facing the wrath of the courts?