Must Read! Putin Signs Secret Pact to Crush NATO

[Petros Houhoulis]

Not anymore. London can go as far as I'm concerned.

Looking for Putin pesticide?

[glass]

Ending US hegemony - yes, world dominance - surely not

[finsun835]

you care joking, surely

[Anthropos]

Moscow’s long term strategy to take down the United States and achieve world domination is nearing its final phase.

Russia hasn't been even nearly as interested in "world domination" as the United States is so it really doesn't make any sense.

[European Knight]

Political fiction. No one dares to challenge the dominance of NATO's military over the next 50 years. Only this is true quote
"It is also important that realize That Putin is Merely a puppet for the real rulers of Russia - the old KGB / Communist Party hierarchy. Just as every Soviet / Russian leader since Stalin, Putin is playing out his Merely Assigned roles. "

I was reading a study which give Russia winner in case of war vs Nato

[Siberyak]

Hopefully. I'm convinced nato would take the side of musli

[Arhat]

I was reading a study which give Russia winner in case of war vs Nato

a study which is fifty years old? russian was once a world power but today is it just a regional power and can only win wars against even more poorer countries like ukraine and georgia. The nato would easily win a war against russia and because of that putin will never directly attack the west

[Sarmatian]

a study which is fifty years old? russian was once a world power but today is it just a regional power and can only win wars against even more poorer countries like ukraine and georgia. The nato would easily win a war against russia and because of that putin will never directly attack the west

Sure, if you say so. But could you remind me how many wars against an equal rival USA had won? And how many had Russia won?

[Empecinado]

John Glubb, who studied the different stages all empires go through , from its birth to its decline, concluded that all lasted exactly 10 generations or 230-250 years, and his description of the decline stage coincides with the USA , which according to this theory would exist just 10 years more as an hegemonic imperial power able to maintain its tentacles over the world.

Some would be tempted to split hairs and claim that the USA will not follow historical precedent, noting that America’s outburst period was spent not consuming the remnants of a pre-existing empire, but on acquiring vast swathes of largely uninhabited land across a single continent. “America is exceptional”, they may claim, “she’s different” they may object. Glubb pre-emptively pours water on that notion, noting:

"The United States arose suddenly as a new nation, and its period of pioneering was spent in the conquest of a vast continent, not an ancient empire. Yet the subsequent life history of the United States has followed the standard pattern…the periods of the pioneers, of commerce, of affluence, of intellectualism, and of decadence"

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/10...te-of-empires/

[Anthropos]

Even in very pro-Western media there has actually been talk for years now about waning global American power and influence. I think that's what has motivated some people to issue propaganda like what we see in the original post. When America is not looking anymore at total dominance there are some who try to get the world angry with other powers in the world, and displaced from reality. But that's not the way to go, in my opinion. Sound foreign policy should be based on good relations; not on desinformation, fear-mongering, insults, etc.