5
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,971 Given: 7,963 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,813 Given: 872 |
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>Y35>CTS3402>Y33>CTS8816>Y2902>Y3226>YP5224>BY27800
N1c-L1026>CTS10760>VL29>Z4908>L550>L1025>M2783>Y5580>L591>BY158>Y5576
R1a-Z282>Z280>CTS1211>YP1019>YP1020>YP1033*
R1b-U152>L2>DF103>S14469
It's still not an end.
R1a and R1b unite - Join!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,172 Given: 1,259 |
Agzi olan konusuyor.
»Tengri biz menen«
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,371 Given: 558 |
scythians are not turkic
They were light haired Indoeuropean people
This pattern on scythian vase is same pattern we use, look at Croat below my forum name, its national pattern for us
this reconstruction looks similar to me
BTW, oldest records of our history, Roman bishop called us Sarmatians, this is before Sclaven word existed, and lists our people names, which are typical Slavic, therefore what was before Scythian/Sarmatian, now is Slavonic
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,971 Given: 7,963 |
http://en.tengrinews.kz/science/Reco...khstan-255482/
crystal clear Turkic patterns, Turkic dress and Turkic symbol "ram" on top of her hood. There is nothing to discuss anymore...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,566 Given: 4,506 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages
Altaic /ælˈteɪɨk/ is a proposed language family of central Eurasia. Various versions include the Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Koreanic, and Japonic languages.[1] These languages are spoken in a wide arc stretching from northeast Asia through Central Asia to Anatolia and eastern Europe.[2] The group is named after the Altai Mountains, a mountain range in Central Asia.
The Altaic language families share numerous characteristics. The debate is over the origin of their similarities. One camp, often called the "Altaicists", views these similarities as arising from common descent from a proto-Altaic language spoken several thousand years ago. The other camp, often called the "anti-Altaicists", views these similarities as arising from areal interaction between the language groups concerned. Some linguists believe the case for either interpretation is about equally strong; they have been called the "skeptics".[3]
Another view accepts Altaic as a valid family but includes in it only Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic. This view was widespread prior to the 1960s, but has almost no supporters among specialists today.[4] The expanded grouping, including Korean and Japanese, came to be known as "Macro-Altaic", leading to the designation of the smaller grouping as "Micro-Altaic" by retronymy. Most proponents of Altaic continue to support the inclusion of Korean and Japanese.[5]
Micro-Altaic includes about 66 living languages,[6] to which Macro-Altaic would add Korean, Japanese, and the Ryukyuan languages for a total of about 74. (These are estimates, depending on what is considered a language and what is considered a dialect. They do not include earlier states of languages, such as Middle Mongol or Old Japanese.)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,371 Given: 558 |
Last edited by Duke; 01-09-2015 at 06:07 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,858 Given: 1,530 |
Most common haplogroups among Turkic peoples are R1a, R1b, Q, J2 & N. Fucking idiot.
The same can be said about Scythian/Sarmatian-wannabe Slavs. Neither your culture/language, nor your dna have anything to do with Scythians/Sarmatians and other nomadic horse peoples (Even North Caucasians have more ANE Admixture than Slavs). Slavs originate from Pripet Marshes, they were never really part of the Great Steppe (their language, military tactics, culture etc were alien to steppe) , yet they do view themselves as descendants of Scythian tribes, which is one of the funniest anthrofora myths if you ask me. Connecting Slavs to Scythians just because of R1a* is beyond idiotic.
Everything steppe-influenced in their culture & language is due to Cumans, Tatars and other Turkic peoples. Scythians and other tribes of the steppe were already absorbed into Turkic identity & culture when Slavs first stepped out of their marshes. Which is why Anna Comnena of Byzantium called the Pecheneg invaders and their language "Scythian", and other Byzantine Historians called Oghuz Turks "descendants of ancient Massagetae". They were Turanist too, right?
The Cossacks were only steppe-influenced Slavic people. Their dress, military fashion, tactics, arms, armor etc was heavily influenced from neighboring Turk-Tatar, and later from North Caucasian peoples. Even the word "Cossack" is derived from Turkic "Kozak" or "Kazak". Slavs are not steppe people, never were, even though they live in the former lands of steppe peoples.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks