Russian writer defends the massacre of Paris

[glass]

He may not be a native speaker but unlike you he seems to understand the nuance of Limonov's writing.

No he does not, neither do you. There is no a single reference to killers. Whole text is solely about killed journalists.
Once again can you all who have very little to do with russian or slavic languages just gtfo? Thanks in advance.

[Hweinlant]

Paris defends the massacre of Russians in "the ukraine", so I do no see any reason why Russians should have sympathy with Paris.

Difference between ruskie-jihadists and allahuakbars is neglible. Thank god oil prices are down. That's punishing ruskies, mullahs and saudis. All terror exporters. There has been two major terrorist attacks against Europeans in last 6 months or so, the one in Paris committed by the fugly Algerian allahuakbars and another in eastern Ukraine where ruskie-jihadists shot down MH17.

[Shkembe Chorba]

I won't believe you until you translated it, Shkembe. You probably took his words wildly out of context due to your Russia-hate.

What if I am not?

very wrong again.
Firstly he says nobody should insult religion and feelings of religious people, secondly he says even in 1996 (18 years ago), he protested againt possible inslut (Rushdie book). In case you do not know, Iran placed bounty on Rushdie's head because of his "anti-muslim" book. Limonov says it just to prove he was always against such insults. Not only now but at least since 1996. If you are not capable of understanding text you can always ask...

I understood the text. I understood that we have 12 dead people punishment for the низость.

[Shkembe Chorba]

If a countryman of mine defends the shooting in Paris I will fully disagree, because it is shameful action. I will not accuse others of not understanding simple and mediocre logic in a written text.

[Hweinlant]

If a countryman of mine defends the shooting in Paris I will fully disagree, because it is shameful action. I will not accuse others of not understanding simple and mediocre logic in a written text.

Have a look at this:
http://lifenews.ru/news/148122

CIA and USA are behind the Paris attacks. Blaah.

[Shkembe Chorba]

Have a look at this:
http://lifenews.ru/news/148122

CIA and USA are behind the Paris attacks. Blaah.

lol.

Ruskie paranoia in its finest. Lifenews were always a good tribune for fake accusations but this is even beyond.

[Zmey Gorynych]

No he does not, neither do you. There is no a single reference to killers. Whole text is solely about killed journalists.
Once again can you all who have very little to do with russian or slavic languages just gtfo? Thanks in advance.

I actually have a lot more to do with russian than I'd like to and from the looks of it more to do than you. I don't get the part I bolded and how it proves your point of view. Just because you're a native speaker of russian you may understand the following.

Семантические свойства сочетания "ну что ж":

- употребляется при выражении одобрения чего либо, согласия с чем либо, соответствуя по значению словам: хорошо, ладно.
- употребляется при подчёркивании перехода к новой мысли, подведения итога ранее сказанному; таким образом, итак.

Так как после сочетания "что ж" ничего не следует можно смело заявить что Лимонов одобряет наказание аморальной низости. Or isn't that so, ochkarik?

[glass]

- употребляется при выражении одобрения чего либо, согласия с чем либо, соответствуя по значению словам: хорошо, ладно.

12 corpses is a result of "amoral behavior". Then "что ж" to support this statement
He classifies their drawings as amoral and insulting, and thinks it is main reason of what happened to them. Is it wrong? It is pretty official "muslim revenge" and it is percieved so. Quetion is were killer's actions justified? Reason of something and justifing are different matters. He clearly says he condemn killers.
Journalists were killed because of their drawings - Limonov opinion
Killers had rights to punish journalists for their drawings - presumabe defending of killers. You are trying to equalise these 2

[TheForeigner]

Communist swine. I remember a few years ago some communist Jew intelectual from Hungary said there should be a Gypsy bloody uprising in Europe, for they are being opressed!

[TheForeigner]

They had not a right to even say shit for some drawings in a newspaper in a free country. This man is a communist swine.