0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,391 Given: 6,153 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,165 Given: 10,233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,391 Given: 6,153 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,165 Given: 10,233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,391 Given: 6,153 |
Looks like this guy
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,165 Given: 10,233 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,474 Given: 11,852 |
Not at all, the Iranid proper or West Iranid type from Iran is not compressed and is more gracile though less than other substratums of Mediterranean phenotypes.
These Kyrgyz men represent the type of the face the so-called "Bulgar" (which is probably something else) above has, compressed with cheekbones very visible. The last guy showing a "Scythian" Iranic type that Eastern Iranics could've had, but have been mostly absorbed by the Turkic people when they migrated to central Asia which was inhabited by Iranic people.
Bulgars were definitely Turkic, but had picked up certain other elements during their migration to the balkans, just like how Magyars picked up Turkic Cumans and Iranic Ossetian. That said, the ancient Bulgar type was most likely Caucasoid, probably Uralid with certain Mongoloid influences as visible in groups such as Chuvash, Volga Tatars etc. Today's Bulgarian people are a Slavic people (since their Slavic speakers), but had Thracian and Bulgar-Turkic elements in their society in ancient times.
The Indo-Aryan Languages--------Beautiful Bengal--------Kashmir: Paradise on Earth--------The Nord-Indid Phenotype--------Ethnic Groups of Southern Asia
卐Janani Janmabhumischa Swargadapi Gariyasi卐
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,391 Given: 6,153 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,840 Given: 1,720 |
bulgarians needs to stop denying this obvious fact, really. bulgars were definetly turkic. full stop. this is not even a discussion subject, we're living in 2015.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks