0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,915 Given: 7,434 |
In the Temska Manuscript of Pirot (Torlakian-speaking area) dating back to 1764, the local speech is referred to as Buglarian.
The title of the manuscript is "Из душевного обреда в’ неделных днех слова избрана. На прости язык болгарскій". - "Selected words from the weekly spiritual rituals. In simple Bulgarian language".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temska_manuscript
But you have a point about them celebrating Slava which is a Serb tradition. Is it possible that Shops originally identified as their own distinct people but then later assimilated into Serbs and Bulgarians?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
In Bulgarian part of Shopluk Slava is banned in 1879.
The strongest haplogroup among Serbs from Torlakian speaking region is I2-PH908. They have less in % than Dinaric Serbs, but still is the strongest.
On the other hand among Bulgarian I2a-Din is not even on the first place, let slone I2-PH908.
^^
Before genetic researches I used to bealive that Serb Torlakians are close related with Bulgarians, but not now.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,915 Given: 7,434 |
Now that I think about it, I think the reason the Temska Manuscript was referred to as Bulgarian is because Old Church Slavonic and Bulgarian may have been used synonymously since OCS is based off the variety of Slavic spoken in Bulgaria (the first Slavic land to start writing in their language). In the past, OCS was the language of liturgy in Orthodox Slavic countries and most official documents in Orthodox Slavic lands would have been written in OCS (Bulgarian).
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,494 Given: 1,539 |
Mostly here as a spectator. I truly like their folk music. I remember these women having garnered a modest following when I was a boy.
______________
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,915 Given: 7,434 |
But I don't think "Bulgarian language" would be used as a social term. I think it means Old Church Slavonic in this context.
My point was that even though the Temska Manuscript refers to the manuscript's language as Bulgarian, that doesn't mean that Torlakians natively called their actual language was called Bulgarian. It was probably just what they called the liturgical language (OCS) not what they spoke in their homes.
By the way, Shopi and Torlakian-speaking are not the same thing.
Shopluk (according to Serbian geographer Jovan Cvijić)
Torlakian-speaking lands
Last edited by Mingle; 08-17-2019 at 12:59 AM. Reason: Forgot some words
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,636 Given: 40 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,915 Given: 7,434 |
Since both Shtokavian and Torlakian are part of the same dialect continuum, is there any way to draw the dividing line between Shtokavian and Torlakian? Like why is the dialect in Nish considered Torlakian but not the dialect in Krushevac? Does the Nish dialect have some features that the Krushevac dialect doesn't that makes it Torlakian? Or is the line between what is considered Shtokavian and Torlakian just drawn randomly?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks