Ancient Humans Bred with Completely Unknown Species

[Prisoner Of Ice]

Multiregionalism as a model of human Pleistocene evolution was founded in 1984, not 200 years ago. It only deals with Pleistocene evolution. The 'morphological clades' of Multiregionalism (which some consider to be races, although this is debatable), no longer exist. Milford H. Wolpoff, the leading proponent of Multiregionalism has put out many papers criticizing the concept of race.

The funny thing is that far-right morons (usually white nationalists) misinterpret Multiregional evolution. Most of what you posted is false and gibberish, and not what Multiregionalism states. This is also done on other forums like Forumbiodiversity, Occidental Enclave etc. But I don't see the point in someone having to waste their time trying to explain the basics to you.

Everything you said is incorrect, and you are a fucking idiot if you believe any of that.

[Pyramidologist]

Everything you said is incorrect, and you are a fucking idiot if you believe any of that.

You're 100% a troll.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

You're 100% a troll.

Nope, wrong. 155+ IQ and much older than you. When I was a fucking kid a read about multiregionalism, they taught it in schools you stupid fuck. And this was before 1984. There was no OOA.

This is like when some stupid fuck says there are only 8 planets in the solar system, or that the last glacial maximum was not an ice age. This is all retconned bullshit and you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

[Mn The Loki TA Son]

Interesting.

[Pyramidologist]

Nope, wrong. 155+ IQ and much older than you. When I was a fucking kid a read about multiregionalism, they taught it in schools you stupid fuck. And this was before 1984. There was no OOA.

This is like when some stupid fuck says there are only 8 planets in the solar system, or that the last glacial maximum was not an ice age. This is all retconned bullshit and you have no idea what the fuck you are talking about.

I understand what Multiregionalism is, you don't dumbass. You just posted gibberish and false statements on the other page.

Have you even read a single paper by Milford Wolpoff, Alan Thorne or any other Multiregionalist?

[Prisoner Of Ice]

I understand what Multiregionalism is, you don't dumbass. You just posted gibberish and false statements on the other page.

Have you even read a single paper by Milford Wolpoff, Alan Thorne or any other Multiregionalist?

I read tons of papers shit for brains. If you think it started in 1984 you are the stupidest fuck on the planet.

[Pyramidologist]

I read tons of papers shit for brains. If you think it started in 1984 you are the stupidest fuck on the planet.

Yea, whatever you say. http://www.rw-designer.com/icon-view/6837.png

"The fullest early articulation of the Multiregional Evolution hypothesis was a chapter by Wolpoff, Wu, and Thorne in the 1984 volume that was the predecessor to this one (Wolpoff et al., 1984)." (Rosenberg & Wu, 2013)

"Multiregional Evolution (MRE), first articulated in 1984 by Milford H. Wolpoff, Alan G. Thorne and X. Z. Wu." (Hartwig, 2002)

"In 1984 Milford, Alan Thorne, and Wu Xinzhi included their first detailed discussion of Multiregional evolution." (Wolpoff & Caspari, 1997)

[Prisoner Of Ice]

Yea, whatever you say. http://www.rw-designer.com/icon-view/6837.png

"The fullest early articulation of the Multiregional Evolution hypothesis was a chapter by Wolpoff, Wu, and Thorne in the 1984 volume that was the predecessor to this one (Wolpoff et al., 1984)." (Rosenberg & Wu, 2013)

"Multiregional Evolution (MRE), first articulated in 1984 by Milford H. Wolpoff, Alan G. Thorne and X. Z. Wu." (Hartwig, 2002)

"In 1984 Milford, Alan Thorne, and Wu Xinzhi included their first detailed discussion of Multiregional evolution." (Wolpoff & Caspari, 1997)

Multiregionalism was nothing new, shit for brains. Just classical darwinism. This was the accepted form of evolution, and even wolpoff gives the credit to a predecessor. The entire point of the paper was to debunk a thoroughly retarded marxist pseudopscientific bullshit called punctuated equillibrium.

Out of africa paper did not come out until years after that around 1990 or something, it was entirely based on mtdna found in africa and molecular clock nonsense (yet more ridiculous pseudoscience and those figures are long since debunked).

Now kill yourself.

[Pyramidologist]

Multiregionalism was nothing new, shit for brains. Just classical darwinism. This was the accepted form of evolution, and even wolpoff gives the credit to a predecessor. The entire point of the paper was to debunk a thoroughly retarded marxist pseudopscientific bullshit called punctuated equillibrium.

Out of africa paper did not come out until years after that around 1990 or something, it was entirely based on mtdna found in africa and molecular clock nonsense (yet more ridiculous pseudoscience and those figures are long since debunked).

Now kill yourself.

Multiregionalism as a model of human evolution doesn't predate 1980s. Please stop with the silly trolling.

And here's Wolpoff's views on race in a 2012 interview:

"I've written a bit on this. Humans today are widely variable, but without enough population differences to be considered subspecies or races. This was not the case in the past where the total a mount of variation was similar to today but some populations were quite different from others, making subspecies. Neandertals in Europe and other human populations in Africa or Asia are an example of this. Simply put, there are no human races today, there were in the past." - March 2012 GHMB community interview with Milford H. Wolpoff on Paleoanthropology

Multiregionalism does not support the existence of modern human races. You are a clown.

[Prisoner Of Ice]

Multiregionalism as a model of human evolution doesn't predate 1980s. Please stop with the silly trolling.

And here's Wolpoff's views on race in a 2012 interview:

"I've written a bit on this. Humans today are widely variable, but without enough population differences to be considered subspecies or races. This was not the case in the past where the total a mount of variation was similar to today but some populations were quite different from others, making subspecies. Neandertals in Europe and other human populations in Africa or Asia are an example of this. Simply put, there are no human races today, there were in the past." - March 2012 GHMB community interview with Milford H. Wolpoff on Paleoanthropology

Multiregionalism does not support the existence of modern human races. You are a clown.

Just some politically correct nonsense thrown in so he doesn't get accused of being racis.

Change in Pleistocene populations did not involve speciation (the splitting of one species into two): all this time, the geographically distinct populations maintained small amounts of gene flow.

Since you are a fucking moron, I will spell out what this means. Another model is something like polycentric or some similar name, where each race has a similar identity. The reason for talking about gene flow is that he is saying they are interrelated even back then, ONE SPECIES AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN. Obviously, there is no question of geneflow in modern times or even in paleolithic times, you fucking idiot.

As for race, race is a taxonomic definition. You could say neanderthal is a race, or say it is a species, and it's the same thing. Multiregionalism and in fact origin of man in general does not define races, it's nothing to do with races. That doesn't mean they don't exist, though. They do, and the variation between humans in the three main races is about a hundred times more than all the variation in every breed of dog combined if you want to get some idea of how real it is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Weidenreich

Weidenreich pioneered the Polycentric (multiregional), which proposed that that the human races have evolved independently in the Old World from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens sapiens, while at the same time there was gene flow between the various populations.[3]

A vocal proponent of the Weidenreich Theory was Carleton Coon, however Coon modified Weidenreich's Polycentric view of evolution, since he stressed far less on gene flow

Anyway wolpoff was not the first to have this basic idea, and didn't even come up with the name. I should not have said 200 years though, I meant to say two centuries.

It all starts with darwin really. He has a lot of hilarious things to say about africans and their destiny to be outcompeted which social justice warriors would not like. Darwin is all well and good until you actually look at the facts of what he said

However he did not publish anything about humans officially because of the controversy he knew it would cause. He left that to a scottish guy whose name I can't remember.

I know it was called multiregionalism before that, too. I was taught it in 5th grade in the 70s so...

Anyway, you are just a brainwashed ignorant retard spewing retarded propaganda. Now shut your cockhole.