0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,784 Given: 10,478 |
So a "source" is another anthro forum?
Besides, this is still a hypothesis.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
no its not
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25738
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,473 Given: 10,006 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
R1b is real proto-Indo-European marker, more so than R1a.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Really? So who was this guy, what language did he speak?:
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...en-on-GEDmatch
On the other hand we are in 2019 and there are still no any R1b-L51 samples from the Steppe.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 338 Given: 225 |
Both R1a and R1b coexisted in samara eneolithic early PIE horizons like Khvalynsk phase II.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
A tiny little noise fart of Borzani Kurds, too. They have the same mutation of the maximum Bashkir clade. So basically Turkic sperms from the Urals.
2) The connection of the Burzyan with the Digorians, now also relies on the fact of the common snip Z2105 inherent in both clans. It is explained by me that the common ancestors of the Burzyans and Digorians lived in the Aral Sea region, at the end of the 1st millennium BC. in the composition of the massagesta confederation of tribes. In my opinion, migrations of the ancestors of the Digorians R1b-Z2105 and Burdjans Z2105 from the Aral Sea to the Urals and the North Caucasus in the beginning are connected with the Alan-Burdjan tribe.
3) As for the Burzyans and Borzani Kurds, their kinship goes back to the 3rd millennium BC, as indicated by the presence of their common ancestor more than 4 thousand years ago. The negative result on the L584 snapshot confirmed the distant affinity of the Bashkir Burzyans and Kurdish Borzani, the position of this snapshot among the Burzyans in December 2013 of the EHP Suyun; Vol.1, November 2014, №1 [1,2]; ISSN: 2410-1788 33 years was not yet known. L584 was ordered, and as it turned out, the haplotypes of Burzyan and Borzani could not be calculated by the formula SKRJAMM, since they are from different subclades, and L584 is negative in Bashkir Burzians. Now it is absolutely clear that there can be no question of any closer relationship between the borzani and the burzyanas, which could have been less than 4 thousand years ago. There is no doubt that the Burzyan and Borzani had a single origin, but it was more than 4 thousand years ago and the migration of the sub-deposit R1b-M269, in my opinion, came from the Urals to the Caucasus, and not vice versa. ”
Last edited by Proto-Shaman; 03-19-2019 at 03:10 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks