Are female circumcision and polygamy objectively wrong?

[Tooting Carmen]

Even if women actively consent to them, are they still always wrong?

[Unome]

Even if women actively consent to them, are they still always wrong?

I finally, recently came to the conclusion, that morality is a function of time, era, generation, culture, and society.

Sometimes it is morally righteous to have 7 wives, sometimes morally righteous to have 1 wife, sometimes morally righteous to have 0 wives and chase a bunch of sluts instead…

[Instinct]

Yes, both of them are objectively wrong and must be banned in every society.

[Porpolita]

Genital mutilation is wrong. No arguing against that. Unless there is some sort of medical reason. But in the other 99% of cases it is inexcusable.

Although Polygamy is unconventional, it is not necessarily wrong. If man has more than one wife. If a woman has more than one husband. Or if there are many females together, or many males together, it does not hurt anyone. As long as all people involved are aware and give their uttermost conscent then I don't see what the problem is.

Personally, I would feel uncomfortable in a relationship with multiple partners, but if other people want to do so, it does not harm me or anybody else.

[Sikeliot]

Female circumcision yes. Polygamy is not wrong if all parties consent, in my view. And that they all use protection.

[Dictator]

The gays said that polygamy is ok, no wonder people call them pervs

[Prince Of Macrobia]

Female circumcision begun from pharaoh time, spread to Horn of Africa, specially Somalia were some tribes still practices but my view is forbidden, is not right.

[Prince Of Macrobia]

I supposed to say yes is wrong but I voted no. My bad

[Longbowman]

I finally, recently came to the conclusion, that morality is a function of time, era, generation, culture, and society.

Finally

[Odin]

Both are wrong.