Al Qaeda Doesn’t Exist

**Rudy** · 02-10-2009, 01:22 AM

It is a scare tactic used to promote agendas.

The War on Terror Is a Hoax
by PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

There were no al Qaeda in Iraq until the Americans brought them there by invading and overthrowing Saddam Hussein, who kept al Qaeda out of Iraq. The Taliban is not a terrorist organization, but a movement attempting to unify Afghanistan under Muslim law. The only Americans threatened by the Taliban are the Americans Bush sent to Afghanistan to kill Taliban and to impose a puppet state on the Afghan people.

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/chan...contentid=5762

**Sol Invictus** · 02-11-2009, 02:44 PM

Man sought by UK authorities over alleged sending of DVD

Irish Times
Wednesday, February 11, 2009

A MAN sought by the UK authorities for allegedly attempting to pervert the course of justice by sending a controversial DVD to a judge and jury foreman during a trial relating to bomb attacks in London in July 2005 has appeared before the High Court after being arrested in Co Meath.

Sheffield-born Anthony John Hill (60) was arrested by gardaí at his home in Carrick Street, Kells, early yesterday morning on foot of a European Arrest Warrant, Mr Justice John MacMenamin was told.

Mr Hill’s extradition is being sought in relation to his alleged actions during the trial of several people on conspiracy charges related to the attacks on July 7th, 2005, that took place on the London underground and a London bus.

It is alleged that, in May and June 2008, Mr Hill sent several copies of a DVD entitled 7/7 Ripple Effect to the judge and the foreman of a jury at the trial at Kingston Crown Court of people allegedly involved in assisting the 2005 bombings.

7/7 Ripple Effect is a film, available on the internet, which claims people accused of involvement in the bombings are innocent and that the bombings were an “inside job”, perhaps involving state intelligence agencies in either Britain or Israel.

The British authorities claim copies of the DVD were sent, in packaging with Irish postal marks, between September 2007 and December 2007 to five relatives of people who had been killed during the bombing.

In court yesterday, Sgt Seán Fallon said that when arrested at his Kells home at 8.14am, Mr Hill, when asked about the DVD, had said: “I sent it. I believe those men to be innocent.”

Sgt Fallon said Mr Hill had said that a friend of his had made the DVDs and that copies were made on his computer.

Gardaí took possession of computers at Mr Hill’s home yesterday and will apply to the court to send those computers to the British authorities.

The matter was adjourned by Mr Justice MacMenamin to February 18th and Mr Hill was remanded in custody.

----------------------------------------------------

Now here's the video of 7/7: The Ripple Effect
[GVIDEO]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8756795263359807776&ei=_PCSSZjuFou Q-wH596HFBw&q=7+7+ripple+effect [/GVIDEO]

**Sol Invictus** · 02-11-2009, 08:24 PM

Still Standing: The Building That Proves WTC 7 Was Imploded

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, February 10, 2009

New videos of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel fire in Beijing highlight the vivid contrast between the damage it suffered as it was completely consumed by roaring flames, yet remained standing, and the comparative sporadic fires across just 8 floors that led to the complete free fall collapse of WTC 7.

9/11 truth debunkers are in a bind as to how to respond to the Beijing skyscraper fire because of the building’s similarity in size to Building 7 and the gargantuan fire damage it suffered in comparison with the limited “office fires” witnessed in WTC 7. The Mandarin Oriental Hotel is over 500 feet tall, just 100 feet short of the height of WTC 7.

The fires that consumed the Beijing building were on a completely different scale to those witnessed on 9/11, with the flames so violent and widespread that they masked almost the entire view of the building.

The best debunkers have come up with seems to be the false notion that the fires caused a partial collapse by making the building “lean”. This is of course complete baloney because the facade of the building was designed to appear as if it was leaning in the first place, as the image below highlights, with shots before and after the fire.

Since the Beijing building was still under construction, sprinkler systems had not been installed, providing another similarity to WTC 7, in which sprinkler systems malfunctioned before its collapse. The Mandarin Oriental Hotel was also a steel-framed building with a concrete core and may even have included steel salvaged from the debris of the twin towers and WTC 7 that was hastily shipped off to China shortly after 9/11.

Just take a look at the intensity of the fire that consumed the building but failed to bring it down in the following You Tube clip.

[YOUTUBE]6hSPFL2Zlpg[/YOUTUBE]

Now compare that with the fires that preceded the collapse of WTC 7.

[YOUTUBE]Afb7eUHr64U[/YOUTUBE]

How can any rational thinking person watch those two videos and lend any credence whatsoever to NIST’s claim that “thermal expansion” could have brought down WTC 7 into its own footprint, whereas the dramatic inferno that totally consumed the Beijing building had little structural effect whatsoever?

Apparently forgetting NIST’s newly invented “thermal expansion” theory, a scientific discovery that presumably has replaced the laws of physics, this Chinese news correspondent stands perilously close to the building completely unaware that since 9/11, all buildings that suffer minor fires, never mind towering infernos such as this, must collapse within 7 seconds into their own footprint.

[YOUTUBE]geAHieWER7Q[/YOUTUBE]

Here are another two clips for comparison.

[YOUTUBE]ZQ6aEqAlTVU[/YOUTUBE]

The dramatic flames engulfing the Beijing building, compared to the restricted “office fires” in WTC 7.

[YOUTUBE]JBfuw_Dlfkw[/YOUTUBE]

Here are four more images of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel ablaze and the aftermath.

And on 9/11….

[YOUTUBE]LD06SAf0p9A[/YOUTUBE]

**Sol Invictus** · 02-11-2009, 09:22 PM

Terrorstorm

[GVIDEO]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947&ei=jU-TSbOJIoSa-wHalPSqAg&q=terrorstorm+alex+jones[/GVIDEO]

Alex Jones' TERRORSTORM film covers in detail the proven history of government sponsored terrorism, and focuses on the 7/7 London bombings and 9/11.

**Rudy** · 05-05-2009, 12:28 PM

If there is no Al Qaeda, then who perpetrated 9-11?

The Bush administration needed a reason that complied with the Laws so they could go after “the bad guy of their choice”. They paid Jamal al Fadl, hundreds of thousands of dollars to back the U.S. Government’s story of Al-qaeda, a “group” or criminal organization they could “legally” go after.

http://polidics.com/cia/top-ranking-...brication.html