Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: The medieval Bosnia

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    8 Not allowed!

    Default The medieval Bosnia


    The history of Bosnia in the high middle ages is frequently confused and confusing. But three powerful rulers stand out: Ban Kulin (who ruled from 1180 to 1204), Ban Stephen Kotromanić (1322-1353) and King Stephen Tvrtko I 1353-1391). Under the second of these, Bosnia expanded to include the principality of Hum (what is today known as Herzegovina); and under the third it expanded further to the south and also acquiring a large part of the Dalmatian coast. Indeed, during the second half of Tvrtko's reign Bosnia was the most powerful state within western Balkans.

    During that time Hungary was a dominant neighboring country under whose rule was Croatia but not Bosnia.




    In the 13th and early 14th century Serbian Kingdom also grew into militarily powerful state; but there was newer any large scale attempt by Serbian kings to conquer Bosnia [1]. As the kings of Hungary were frequently to discover, the impenetrability of Bosnian terrain made it a troublesome prize to obtain, and its fractious noble landowners made it, ones obtained, an asset of dubious value.

    Most puzzling feature of Bosnian medieval history was the schismatic Bosnian Church. This Church seem to have fallen away from the Catholic Church in the 13th century, and to have operated on its own in Bosnia until the coming of Franciscans, who tried to reassert the authority of Rome in the 1340s. There after Bosnian church competed against Roman Catholic Church for a century, until its functionaries were either expelled or forcibly converted to Catholicism on the eve of Turkish conquest. Throughout the lifetime of the Bosnian Church, papal writers accused the Bosnians of heresy.

    Ban Kulin had legendary status on both medieval and modern Bosnia. Te reason for this is because he brought prosperity and peace o Bosnia. During 24 years of peace Ban Kulin economically developed Bosnia by making commercial treaty with Ragusa (Republic of Dubrovnik) in 1189, and encouraged Ragusan merchants to exploit rich Bosnian mines [2], he also established good relations both with the ruler of Hum (today known as Herzegovina), who married Kulin's sister and with the Serbian grand župan, Stephen Nemanja, founder of the Nemanjid dynasty which was to turn Serbia into great power during the next two centuries.

    However relations with Hungary were less amicable with two other states; Hungary, which was still regarded itself as holding ultimate sovereignty over Bosnia, and Zeta (modern Montenegro), which allied it self with Hungary for tactical political reasons.

    Church politics, not war, was the form the conflict took. Bosnia (unlike Orthodox Hum) was Catholic country, and came under the authority of the Archbishop of Ragusa (Dubrovnik), because of its remoteness Bosnia was little interfered by Ragusan hierarchy: it was virtually allowed to appoint its own bishop (whose diocese extended northwards into Hungarian-Croatian lands). Hungary wanted closer control over the Bosnian bishoprics, and campaigned at Rome in the early 1190s to have it transferred to jurisdiction of more pro-Hungarian Archbishop of Split. Then ruler of Zeta (modern Montenegro), who was keen to discredit both Bosnia and Ragusa, started sending letters to the Pope complaining that Ban Kulin, his wife and thousands of his subjects had become heretics, these complains may have been a way of requesting papal permission to invade some Bosnian territory. But this was defused by Ban Kulin by holding a council of the Bosnian Catholic Church at Bilino Polje in 1203 where a series of errors were officially renounced. These errors seem to have related to lax religious practices rather then any serious doctrinal heresies; but the tradition of stigmatizing Bosnia with accusations of heresies had now been established.

    During the half-century which followed, Bosnia was under constant pressure from its more powerful Hungarian neighbor. Hungarians had not given up their plan to gain control over the bishopric of Bosnia. The papacy sent a constant stream of requests to the Hungarian rulers and bishops during the 1230s to drive out heresy from the diocese of Bosnia.

    Hungarian rulers wanted a religious justification for invasion of Bosnia. The invasion duly took place in the latter 1230s; by 1238 the Hungarians had captured the south central region of Bosnia and were busy attempting to install the Dominican order of friars. The Bosnian Ban, Ninoslav, retained some territory, however; and when the Hungarian army was suddenly withdrawn northwards in 1241 to meet the threat of Mongol invasion of Hungary he was able to retain power in Bosnia. The Mongols crushed the Hungarian army, and proceeded on trail of plunder and destruction trough northern Croatia to Dalmatia. But on hearing of the death of the Great Khan they returned eastwards, via Zeta (Montenegro) and Serbia. They thus managed to circumnavigate Bosnia, leaving it largely unscathed.

    In the second half of 13th century Bosnia seems to have led a more isolated existence. Hungary persuaded the Pope in 1252 to place the bishopric of Bosnia under the authority of an archbishopric inside Hungary; however; the main effect of this was that henceforth the Bosnian bishop lived outside Bosnia (in Hungarian-controlled Slavonia), and the leverage which any outside authority could exert over the Catholic Church inside of Bosnia was reduced almost to nothing [3]. Hungary made one more attempt to invade Bosnia in 1253, but there after the original Banate of Bosnia - the successor to Ban Kulin's state - seem to been left to its own devices for the rest of the century. Several northern regions of modern Bosnia, however, such as Soil or 'salt' region round Tuzla, were assigned to members of the Hungarian royal family. The north-eastern section of these lands was combined with territory in northern Serbia to form a Hungarian duchy known as Mačva [4].

    It was from these northern lands that the next ruling family of Bosnia emerged. Stephen Kotroman succeeded his father in the 1280s as a ruler of one of the northern Bosnian territories, and married the daughter of the ruler of Mačva. He then conducted a prolonged struggle for power, the details of which are unclear, against another noble family, the Šubićes, based in the Bribir region of Dalmatia. The Šubićes appeared to have ruled the old Banate of Bosnia for the most of the two decades of the 14th century, and to have friendly relations with Kotroman's son, Stephen Kotromanić, for some of the time. But in the early 1320s Kotromanić gained the upper hand: a Šubić was a Ban of Bosnia in 1318, but Kotromanić had replaced him by 1322. Once in power, he began building up a large Bosnian state which united the old Banate with some northern territories. To this he added by conquest, areas to the west of Banate which have previously been part of Croatia and would henceforth remain as Bosnian territory. He further extended this conquest to take couple of hundred miles of Dalmatian coast between Ragusa and Split. In 1326 he annexed most of the Hum (Herzegovina), thus making a single political entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina for the first time. Until then Hitherto Hum had existed under its own succession of local ruling families; and its religious history had been separate too, with large Orthodox population [5].

    Kotromanić took care to cultivate friendly relations with foreign powers. It was his great good fortune that that Serbian kingdom, which was undergoing an extraordinary growth in power under its ruler Stephan Dušan, was preoccupied with expanding southwards into Macedonia, Albania and northern Greece. Kotromanić signed treaties with Ragusa (1334) and Venice (1335), and cooperated willingly with the Hungarian king, sending Bosnian troops to assist him in his campaigns against troublesome nobles in Croatia. When Stephen Kotromanić died 1353, he left behind a Bosnian state which was independent, prosperous and powerful.

    But the Bosnian stability still depended on the cooperation of noble families who had their own power-basis in the different parts of the country. The nephew who succeeded Kotromanić, Stephen Tvrtko, was only aged 15, and did not have the authority or the military power to keep these centrifugal forces together. At the same time the Hungarian king was keen to exploit divisions in Bosnia in order to regain territories for him self. For the first 14 years of his reign Tvrtko had to contend with Bosnian revolts and seizures of land by Hungary; in 1366 he was even forced to seek refuge at the Hungarian court, when a group of Bosnian nobles set up his brother Vuk in his place. But by 1367 - apparently with the assistance of the King of Hungary, who realized that he had been stirring up troubles from which neither Tvrtko nor him self would benefit - Tvrtko was back in power in Bosnia. Thereafter he had little troubles from Hungarian king, who become more concerned with the events on Hungary's northern borders.

    Tvrtko now turned his attention southwards. The huge Serb empire had broken up very quickly after the death of its creator, Stephen Dušan, in 1355. One of the Serbian noblemen who were now trying to cave out territory from its remains was Lazar Hrebljanović, who was engaged in a complex struggle for power with other nobles in the region of south-western Serbia, Hum (Herzegovina) and Zeta (Montenegro). Tvrtko gave Lazar the assistance he needed, and was rewarded in the subsequent share-out of the spoils with a large strip of territory adjoining Bosnia to the south and south-east: parts of Hum, Zeta and southern Dalmatia (including a section of the coast between the Ragusa and the Bay of Kotor) and what later became the Sandžak of Novi Pazar. This last component included the monastery of Miloševo, which contained the relics of the Saint Sava, one of the most sacred figures in the history of the Serbian Orthodox Church.





    In 1377 Tvrtko celebrated this improvement in his position by having him self crowned as King at Miloševo - not only King of Bosnia but King of Serbia too. King Tvrtko never seriously attempted to exercise political power over Serbia [6]. King Tvrtko's political and territorial ambitions lay elsewhere. He tried to set up a port of his own on the northern side of the Bay of Kotor: he called it Novi meaning 'new' (modern Herceg-Novi), but this plan was quietly dropped because it angered the Ragusans. Meanwhile a civil war has broken out in the Croatian lands after the death of the King of Hungary in 1382. Aligning himself with one of the most powerful of competing Croatian families, Tvrtko sent his troops into Dalmatia and took control of the entire coastline (including even son of the islands), with the exception of the Ragusa, which retained its independence and Zadar which was under Venetian suzerainty. Venice had strong ambitions in this region, and would eventually regain most of the Dalmatian coast after Tvrtko's death. But for the time being Tvrtko was the master of a greatly expanded Bosnian kingdom which had also taken in parts of northern Croatia and Slavonia: in the last two years before his death in 1391 King Tvrtko was calling himself King of Croatia and Dalmatia too.

    With the late 1380s and early 1390s we have reached another of the great turning-points in western Balkan history. Ottoman Turkish armies had been moving westwards across Thrace and Bulgaria since the 1350s, and in 1371 a large a large contingent of Serbian forces had met them in Bulgaria, and have been heavily defeated. In the 1380s the Turks have began raiding Serbia itself; and in 1388 a Turkish raiding party crossed into Bosnian-ruled Hum (Herzegovina), where it was wiped out buy forces commanded by a local nobleman, Vlatko Vuković. In 1389 Tvrtko's old Serbian ally Lazar (who had modestly taken the title 'Prince' when Tvrtko had proclaimed himself King) refused to accept the Turkish suzerainty, and called his neighbors and allays to help. King Tvrtko sent large Bosnian force under Vlatko Vuković, which fought along side Prince Lazar's army at the battle of Kosovo Polje in June 1389. Though Serbian myth and poetry have presented this battle as a cataclysmic defeat in which the flower of Balkans chivalry perished on the field and the Turks swept on trough the rest of the Serbia, the truth is a little less dramatic. Losses were heavy on both sides, and the Prince Lazar was captured and executed; but the remains of both sides withdrew after the battle, and for a while the Serb and Bosnian forces have believed that they have won. It was not the battle itself which brought about the fall of Serbia to the Turks, but the fact that while the Serbs had needed all of the forces they could master to hold the Turks to an expensive and temporary draw, the Turks were able to return, year after year, in ever increasing strength. By 1392 all the Serbian Orthodox lands, apart from Bosnian-ruled Hum, have submitted to Ottoman suzerainty.



    King Tvrtko's gold coin


    After Tvrtko's death in 1391 Bosnia entered long period of weak rule and political confusion. One account of Bosnia written by the French pilgrim Gilles Le Bouvier, paints a miserable picture of the place: 'They live purely on wild beasts, fish from the rivers, figs and honey, of which they have sufficient supply, and they go in gangs from forest to forest to rob people who are traveling from one country to another.

    The Bosnia state did not split up after Tvrtko's death, as it had after the death of Stephen Kotromanić, but nobleman with strong regional power-bases reasserted themselves, and the rulers of Bosnia were at the mercy of shifting patterns of rivalry among the leading noble families. The Hungarian king also took an interest again in Bosnian affairs, though heavy defeat of the Hungarian army by the Turks in 1396 limited Hungary's capacity to intervene militarily in Bosnia for several years. In 1404, however, when the Bosnian King Ostoja was driven out by the nobles and replaced by an illegitimate son of King Tvrtko (Tvrtko II), he returned with a Hungarian army and reconquered part of the country. Over next 10 years, with Hungarian backing, Ostoja reasserted his rule and helped to mend relations between Hungary and the most powerful of the Bosnian nobleman, Hrvoje.

    Then, in 1414, a new factor entered to disrupt the balance of power, both militarily and politically: the Ottoman Turks proclaimed the exiled Tvrtko II as rightful King of Bosnia, and sent a large raiding force into Bosnian territory. When a much larger Turkish army returned to Bosnia in the following year, there was a new alignment of forces: on one side King Ostoja and Hungarian army, and on the other side the Turks and the Bosnian nobleman Hrvoje. The Hungarian army was heavily defeated in central Bosnia, and although Ostoja made some sort of a deal in which it was agreed that he, not Tvrtko II, would be confirmed as a King, it was clear that from now on Ottoman Empire would have influence rivaling that of Hungary over Bosnian affairs.

    With the eventual Turkish conquest of Bosnia in mind, some modern historians, especially Serbian ones, have felt instinctively hostile towards those Bosnian rulers and nobleman who have collaborated in this way with the Turks. But their actions were no different from those of previous players in the Bosnian political game who have appealed to Hungary for support; the main difference in their minds would probably have been that the Turks seemed a more remote and perhaps ephemeral presence, less likely to impose any kind of direct rule.

    Ostoja held power for few more years, and actually enlarged the territory he controlled. But after his death in 1418 his son faced the same problems of competing noble families and Turkish intervention. He was driven out 1420, at this time the Turks’ support ensured that Tvrtko II was fully installed as Bosnian king ones more. Bosnia enjoyed a few years of peace in the early 1420s; but then the pattern of allegiances shifted again, with Tvrtko II turning to Hungary for help against the Turks, and also engaging in a territorial war against Serbian forces over the rich mining district of Srebrenica in eastern Bosnia. By the early 1430s his main rivals inside Bosnia, the nobleman Sandalj and King Ostoja’s son, Radivoj, were receiving help and encouragement from both Serb nobleman and the Turks, and had gained control over large part of Bosnia.

    Tvrtko II held on to power in Bosnia until his death in 1433: these final years of his reign were marked by further Turkish raids (including the seizure of Srebrenica in 1440), and continuing growth in power of Stephen Vukčić, the lord of Hum. At first Vukčić refused to recognize Tvrtko’s successor, Stephen Tomaš, and several years of civil war ensued. In 1446 they came to an agreement, but Vukčić continued to give support to Serb ruler, George Branković, who, as a semi-independent vassal of the Turks, was still warring against the Bosnian king for the control over the Srebrenica region of eastern Bosnia. To emphasize his own independent status, Vukčić gave himself a new title in 1448: ‘Herceg of Hum and the Coast’. He later changed this to ‘Herceg of St Sava’ after the saint buried at Miloševo, in his territory. The word ‘Herceg’ was a version of the German Herzog (Duke), and the name ’Herzegovina’ derives from this title [7]. Stephen Vukčić enjoyed few more years of power and prosperity, but in the early 1450s hi was embroiled not only in a war against Ragusa but also in a civil war with his own eldest son. The family dispute flared up again in 1462, when the son sought help from the Turks and encouraged them to include Hercegovina, along with Bosnia, in their plans for a massive assault in 1463.

    The final years of Christian Bosnia were inevitably overshadowed by the Turkish threat. King Stephen Tomaš, desperate to secure promise of the outside help, turned in the 1450s to the papacy. Rome had taken an increasing interest in Bosnia in recent years because the papal authorities had become obsessed with the question of Bosnian heresy, and poured out a stream of documents in the 1440s accusing the Bosnian Church of a whole range of pernicious doctrinal errors, including Manichaeism. Renewed efforts were made by the Franciscans in the 1450s: one report by a papal legate in Bosnia in 1451 stated that ‘in places inhabited by the heretics, as soon as the friars arrive, the heretics melt away like wax before a fire’ [8]. Then in 1459, King Stephen Tomaš agreed to change to a policy of direct persecution. He summoned the clergy of the schismatical Bosnian Church and offered them to choose: conversion to Catholicism, or expulsion from Bosnia. According to the later papal source, two thousand chose conversion, and only forty fled, taking refuge in Hercegovina [9]. The back of the Bosnian Church was thus broken by the Bosnian king himself, just four years before the destruction of the Bosnian kingdom.

    When Stephen Tomaš died in 1461 and was succeeded by his son, Stephen Tomašević, the end of Bosnia was clearly in sight. Tomašević wrote to pope in 1461, predicting a large-scale Turkish invasion and begging for help; he wrote again in early 1463 to Venice, warning that the Turks were planning to occupy the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina that summer, and that they would then move on to threaten the Venetian lands in Dalmatia [10]. But no help came. A large Turkish army under Mehmed II assembled in the spring of 1463 at Adrianople (Edirne), and marched on Bosnia.

    The first Bosnian fortress to fall (on 20 May) was old royal stronghold of Bobovac; King Stephen Tomašević then fled north-westwards to Jajce, and took refuge in near fortress of Ključ. Besieged by the Turks there, he surrendered himself on a promise of safety. Various elaborate stories of his betrayal and his subsequent execution later grew up. But as it happens we have an eye-witness account in the memoirs of Serb-born Turkish janissary, whose description is chillingly matter-of-fact: ‘When the King’s servants, who were in the fortress, saw that their lord had been taken, they gave themselves up The Sultan took possession of the fortress, and ordered that the King and his companions should be beheaded. And he took his entire country into his possession.’ [11]



    Bosnian royal symbol, the fleur-de-lys (Lilium bosniacum)


    Despite its intermittent civil wars and invasions, Bosnia had achieved real prosperity during the high middle ages. The key to its wealth was mining: copper and silver at Kreševo and Fojnica; lead at Olovo; gold, silver and lead at Zvornik; and, above all, silver at Srebrenica. A roman gold-mine at Krupa (north-east of Gornji Vakuf) may also have functioned through the middle ages. The royal courts of Bosnia also had well-organized chancelleries, frequently manned, after the 1340s, by Franciscans; documents were written mainly in Bosnian variety of written language or script called Bosančica. Artists and craftsmen from Ragusa and Venice also came to work in Bosnia; little of their handiwork, alas, remain, but carving of good quality can be seen in the fragments of sculpture which have survived from King Tvrtko’s court at Bobovac, together with the capital of a column decorated with the Bosnian royal symbol, the fleur-de-lys [12]. Of course Bosnia was not an important centre of European culture in the middle ages. But its provincialism should not be exaggerated. The noble families were well connected with a wider world of central European nobility; at the medieval Bosnian courts there were princesses from Hungary, Prussia, Bulgaria, Poland, Serbia, Italy and Greece [13].


    source : http://www.bosniafacts.info/early-hi...edieval-bosnia
    Last edited by Mraz; 03-15-2015 at 11:38 AM.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Religion inside Bosnia



    Bosnian Church is an institution that grew out of a Catholic monastic order which broke, probably in the middle of the thirteenth century, with international Catholicism. It could be considered as the first protestant church in Europe. Documentation from the fourteenth century and especially from the fifteenth, shows Bosnian Church, under its own bishop called djed (grandfather), to be a monastic institution. No sources suggest that any change of theology occurred at the time it broke with Rome and almost all later local and Ragusan (Dubrovnik) sources on the Bosnian Church suggest it was mainstream in its theology throughout its existence.


    Throughout history, the Bosnian Church retained both its more-or-less catholic theology - though it used Slavic language - and its monastic character. Its clergy resided in monasteries called hiže (sing. hiža, meaning house). The clergymen bore the title of Christians (Krstjani) - usually rendered as Patarini in Ragusan Latin language sources. The head of a monastery (hiža) was often called a gost (guest). The djed and his council of twelve strojnici, chiefly composed of gosts, provided that overall supervision was there. Their monasteries were not found throughout Bosnia but were clustered in the center of the state, extending east to the Drina river and south toward and beyond the Neretva river, with a few on the lands of the Kosača family in Herzegovina. Some of their monasteries served as hostels for travelers and were used by Ragusan merchants. The Bosnian Church never established a secular clergy or any sort of territorial organization. The institution seems to have consisted only of a series of scattered monastic houses, usually in villages, each having a relatively small number of monks. Probably peasants could go to these monasteries for services. Gravestone inscriptions at least show that krstjani participated in the burials of laymen.


    The Bosnian Church was tolerated by the state even after the 1340s when a Franciscan mission was established inside Bosnia and the rulers became Catholic. The tolerance, or indifference, of Bosnian rulers and nobility regarding religious issues is a prominent feature of medieval Bosnia. The Bosnian Church did not play a major role in the state and was not a state Church. For most of its existence it had no political role in the state. In fact a political role can be shown chiefly in the early fifteenth century - particularly between 1403 and 1405 - when the djed was an influential advisor at court. His influence then was probably owing to the particular sympathy for his Church on the part of King Ostoja, who most probably was an adherent of the Bosnian Church and the only post-1340 ruler who was not a Catholic. This djed's influence may also have been owing to his particular qualities as an individual. Since Bosnia's rulers from the 1340s -except Ostoja - were all Catholics, it is not surprising that the Bosnian Church was not a major state institution.


    The Church's supporters did include the major nobles; Hrvoje Vukčić, the Radenović-Pavlovići, Sandalj Hranić and Stefan Vukčić, and Paul Klešić were among its adherents. For most of this nobles the services performed for them by the krstjani were entirely religious. Krstjani also usually served as diplomats or mediators in quarrels.


    Few Bosnian Church texts survive. Of these, most important are the surviving pages of Gospel manuscripts. Some are beautifully illustrated: the Radoslav Ritual, the Hval gospel, Tepčija Batalo's Gospel. The last will and testament from 1466 of Gost Radin - a Bosnian Church leader and important diplomat, first for the Pavlovići and later for Stefa Vukčić - survives. A letter written by the djed in 1404, concerning the dispute between the king and the nobleman Paul Klešić, also provides some information on the Church.


    The only contemporary sources describing dualists in Bosnia are foreign (chiefly Italian). They come from the inquisition or the papacy. The papal sources date almost entirely after the late 1440s. Most of these sources simply call the Bosnian dualists they describe "Bosnian heretics". These sources probably refer to a separate and small dualist current also existing in Bosnia that derived from Dalmatian dualist Church (Ecclesia Sclavonia), some of whose members fled to Bosnia at the time of Ban Kulin. This heresy, attracting few followers but seemingly surviving in Bosnia until the end of the Middle Ages, throughout remained a separate institution, distinct from the Bosnian Church.


    One of Bosnia's main differences from the other Balkan lands lay in the fact that no Church had a central role in the life of the state or of the nobles. Noblemen were distributed among all three faiths: Bosnian, Catholic and Orthodox. Bosnia was the only country were membership in the community was not dependent on a common religion. And formal religion doesn't seem to have been important to the Bosnian nobles. They freely changed faiths and freely associated and allied with figures of different faiths. Thus tolerance, or rather indifference, marked Bosnian religious issues until the very end of the state, when papal pressure finally forced King Stefan Tomaš to turn to persecutions.


    The Catholic Church in Bosnia was represented solely by a limited number of Franciscans, who were also limited to a small number of monasteries. The Catholics also had no territorial organization in Bosnia. The Catholic bishop, the titular Bishop of Bosnia, resided outside the state in Djakovo in Sclavonia (Croatia) and played no role in Bosnia, possessing only theoretical authority there.


    The orthodox Church, existing in Hum and the region west of the Drina, was not a major institution in Bosnia either. They did have a major bishop, a metropolitan, at Mileševo, a famous Orthodox monastic center . Sandalj and Stefan Vukčić at one time or another had Orthodox wives who took interest in their Church. orthodox clerics were not found at the royal court or in most of Bosnia. And the number of Orthodox clerics in Hum and the Drina region, as a whole, does not seem to have been large.
    The existence of three faiths in Bosnia prevented the development of a national church and blocked any Church institution from acquiring a major role in the state.


    http://www.oocities.org/athens/troy/9892/bhrelig.html
    Last edited by Mraz; 03-15-2015 at 07:54 PM.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Last Online
    03-11-2023 @ 03:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    waka waka
    Country
    Hong-Kong
    Y-DNA
    R-L151
    Taxonomy
    Like Mowgli, but Romanian
    Hero
    the girl reading this 😍😍
    Gender
    Posts
    3,145
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,188
    Given: 3,105

    1 Not allowed!

    Default



    Do you have a bigger pic?

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Sideritis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Last Online
    01-29-2017 @ 01:41 PM
    Location
    On the Moon
    Ethnicity
    Albanian
    Ancestry
    Illyrian, Thracian
    Country
    Albania
    Region
    Aboriginal
    Politics
    Center-Left
    Hero
    Queen Teuta
    Religion
    Albanism
    Gender
    Posts
    1,122
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 818
    Given: 1,697

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Interesting. Who is the author of this? Thanks for bring it.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aodhan View Post


    Do you have a bigger pic?




    Quote Originally Posted by Sideritis View Post
    Interesting. Who is the author of this? Thanks for bring it.
    It's me of course jk

    I pick interesting articles that have documentations and sources, basically with academical value because there is a lot of garbage on the Internet about Bosnia (and Balkans in general).

  6. #6
    Veteran Member Veneda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Last Online
    02-13-2022 @ 08:04 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Gender
    Posts
    7,935
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11,500
    Given: 12,446

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mraz View Post
    There are no Xoxols on this map

  7. #7
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Rulers of Bosnia : Kulin Ban




    Ban Kulin (1163 – 1204) was a powerful Bosnian Ban who ruled from 1180 to 1204 first as a vassal of the Byzantine Empire and then of the Kingdom of Hungary and finally as de facto independent of either power. He was originally appointed ban by Byzantine Emperor Manuel I Comnenus. He had a son, Stevan, who succeeded him as Bosnian Ban. Kulin founded the House of Kulinić. Many consider him the father of the Bosnian State. He practiced a policy of religious freedom almost unique for his time. He also developed the economy. Stories and legends of Ban Kulin abound in Bosnian literature and folk-lore and Bosnians to this day today refer to Kulin Ban and old good days ("Od Kulina bana i dobrijeh dana").
    Ban Kulin enjoys iconic status in Bosnia as the founding father of Bosnian statehood.



    War with the Byzantines


    His rule is often remembered as Bosnia's golden age, and he is a common hero of Bosnian national folk tales. Bosnia was mostly at peace during his rule. However, in 1183, he led his troops, with the forces of the Kingdom of Hungary under King Bela, and with the Serbs led by Kulin's relative, Duke of All Serbia Stefan Nemanja against the Byzantines. For Ban Kulin, this was an act of treason. The cause of the war was the new imposer to the Imperial throne Andronicus Comnenus, who was not recognized as legitimate by the Hungarian crown. The united forces met little resistance in the eastern Serbian lands - the Greek squadrons were fighting among themselves as the local Byzantine commander Alexios Brannes supported the new Emperor, while Andronicus Lapardes opposed him. The latter deserted the Imperial Army and embarked on adventures on his own. Without difficulties, the Greeks were pushed out of the Valley of Morava and the allied forces penetrated all the way to Sophia, raiding Belgrade, Braničevo, Ravno, Niš and Sophia itself. When the Hungarians withdrew from the conflict, so Ban Kulin also stood down. In Kulin's times, the term Bosnia encompassed roughly the lands of Vrhbosna, Usora, Soli, the Lower Edges and Rama, which is approximately the geographical Bosnia of the twenty first century. As a result of this war, although still a "banate" and not a Kingdom, Bosnia was de facto an independent state. Effectively, Kulin found himself free from both Hungarian and Byzantine suzerainty.


    Christianity and religious pluralism


    The Bogumils, were expelled from Serbia by the Nemanjić, so they settled and populated Bosnia, founding a unique Bosnian Church that spread and gained popularity during under Kulin's reign.


    Concil against Bogumilism



    The Dalmatian King of Zeta or Doclea Vukan Nemanjić reported the Ban to the Pope on January 8, 1199 for heresy, threatening retribution. It appears that Kulin Ban and his wife, as well as his sister - the widow of Prince Miroslav - abandoned Roman Catholicism in favor of Bogumilism together with ten thousand of their Christian subjects. Kulin also gave protection to the banished heretics from Split and Trogir - which Vukan reported to the Pope. The Pope wrote to King Emeric of Hungary to make Kulin prosecute the Bogumils or depose him. Kulin subsequently, on 8 April 1203, organized a congress in Bilino Polje which the Pope's emissaries attended - led by the Pope's legate for the Balkan peninsular, John de Kazemaris; where he officially declared his allegiance to the Roman Catholic Church and declared that he was none other than a true pious Roman Catholic Christian. He claimed that he didn't understand where Heresy existed in Bosnia and continued to practice what the Pope considered to be heresy. The Pope's emissaries traveled to Hungary with Kulin's son, confirming Kulin's loyalty to the Hungarian crown and the Catholic Church. Prince Vukan was enraged and complained to the Pope that he was, in fact, lying; he demanded that the Pope command the Hungarian King to exterminate the Bosnian heretics.


    Death and succession

    At the end of his rule, in 1204, a certain Kotroman the German arrived to Bosnia, descendant of Kotroman the Goth from Ban Borić's time. He settled permanently in Bosnia and is to become the founder of the House of Kotromanić. When Ban Kulin died in 1204, the Bosnian principality "included the lands at the upper flows of the Bosna (the district of Usora) and farther east to the mouth of the Drina.



    Boundaries of Bosnia during the Middle Ages

    The Charter

    The Charter of Kulin is a symbolic birth certificate of Bosnian statehood, as it is the first written document that talks of Bosnian borders (between the rivers of Drina, Sava and Una) and of the elements of the Bosnian state: its ruler, throne and political organization. It also noted Bosnia's population. The Charter was a trade agreement between Bosnia and Republic of Dubrovnik and was written in the Bosancica script. This encouraged trade and established peaceful relations between the two states.





    In the name of the father and the son and the holy spirit.

    I, the Bosnian ban Kulin, promise to thee prince Krvaš and all the citizens of Dubrovnik to be a true friend from now to forever. And I shall keep justice with you and true trust, as long as I live.

    All Dubrovnikans can walk where I rule, trade, move wherever they want to, with real confidence and real heart, without malice, and can give me gifts out of their own free will. They will not be forced by my officers, and as long as they stay in my lands, I will help them as I would myself, as I can, without any evil thoughts.

    God help me, and all of the Holy Gospel.

    I Radoje ban's scribe, wrote this book of ban's Charter, in the years since the birth of Christ a thousand and one hundred and eighty-nine, in the month of August in the twenty-ninth day (on the day of) decapitation of John the Baptist.





    Songs about Kulin Ban
    Last edited by Mraz; 03-22-2015 at 04:16 PM.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Mraz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Bosanska Krajina
    Country
    Belgium
    Politics
    Hero
    TITO
    Gender
    Posts
    5,080
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,187
    Given: 1,740

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Fifty Manichean fallacies in Bosnia according to Torquemada



    Theological structure of Bosnian heresy according to inquisitor de Torquemada:

    Cardinal Juan Torquemada, uncle of the infamous Spanish grand inquisitor Tomas Torquemada, in 1461 compiled a list "fifty Manichean fallacies in Bosnia". Namely, that year three Bosnian nobles were brought in chains to Rome ("three champions of heresy, influential in the king's court"). Cardinal Torquemada questioned them and studied their religion for a whole year and found 50 fallacies. He had Croatian priests at his side, and especially Luka de Talentis, archdeacon from Korčula, who was at the time serving among the pope's curia. In the end he interpreted to the three Bogomil's the list of cardinal Torquemada and based on that list on May 14th 1461 they renounced all 50 "Manichean fallacies" and promised that they will try to persuade their countrymen to change their opinion and renounce them as well. After the ceremonial renunciation the three Bosnian Christians returned to Bosnia. The two of them kept their promises, and one of them reclaimed and escaped into the parts where Stepan Kosača ruled "his friend in unbelief".



    Fifty Manichean fallacies in Bosnia according to Torquemada:

    1. There are two gods, one of which they call supreme good, and the other supreme evil.

    2. There are two principles. The first they call god of light and the other god of darkness.

    3. Some angels have an evil nature and they couldn't stop sinning.

    4. Lucifer ascended into the sky and fought god and he brought many angels from there.

    5. Human souls are demon's trapped inside bodies.

    6. Evil angels, trapped in bodies, will return into heaven with the help of baptism, cleansing and repentance.

    7. They condemn and reject the Old Testament. They say it stems from the god of darkness.

    8. For the angel that spoke to Moses on the hill Sinai, they claim he was evil.

    9. They accept the New Testament only partially. They deny that Jesus was born by a woman and they don't accept his genealogy.

    10. They renounce the patriarchs and prophets of the Old Testament.

    11. They condemn the blessed John the Baptist and claim that there is no greater devil in hell than him.

    12. The tree of knowledge (of good and evil) was a woman, and Adam sinned for having sex with her and that's why he was cast out of heaven.

    13. Blessed Marry was not a woman nor female being but an angel.

    14. Son of god took a pseudo-body and not a real one.

    15. Christ didn't truly suffer nor died, nor did he go to heaven or hell, but all that he did was illusory.

    16. They believe that their church was God's.

    17. They are successors of the apostles, and their heresy is the bishop of the church and the deputy and successor of Peter.

    18. The Roman church was condemned and cast out.

    19. Everyone is a pope, from Saint Peter to Saint Sylvester, whether their religion or not, and saint Sylvester was the first one who went rogue.

    20. They condemn brick churches and called them synagogues, and for those that pray inside them, they say they are performing idolatry.

    21. Use of pictures inside churches is idolatry.

    22. Sign of the cross is the devil's symbol.

    23. They despise the service of the lord, laude and hymns, they say it's all contrary to Christ's gospel and his teachings.

    24. They make fun of and condemn worship of holly relics.

    25. All reverence of saints which is done in churches is condemned and made fun of and they say one should only pray to god and worship him.

    26. Their elders allow the people to pray to them, saying that they are without sin and that they carry the holy ghost in them (Parakletos).

    27. They condemn church sacraments.

    28. They renounce baptism which is done in the water and they say that it is John's baptism and that it cannot save anyone.

    29. They claim that's Christ's baptism is done without water, by placing a book of the gospel on the chest and imposition of hands.

    30. With their baptism everyone achieves forgiveness of sins and becomes as holly as Peter himself.

    31. A child cannot be saved before it reaches the age of reason.

    32. Full worth and power of baptism comes to the baptised from merit of the baptist.

    33. The number of times the baptist sins, that's how many souls, though they be in heaven, will fall into hell.

    34. The number of times the baptist sins, that's the number of baptisms those that he baptised will need.

    35. They renounce the sacrament of confirmation.

    36. They say that the Christ's body cannot turn into bread, and if it is turned, we cannot eat it.

    37. They renounce the sacrament of penance, they say that sins are forgiven by their repeat baptism.

    38. They renounce the sacrament of the last ointment.

    39. They renounce the sacrament of the (holy) order.

    40. Bodily marriage is adultery.

    41. Every sin is a death sin.

    42. Renouncing every church authority, they say that no one must be excommunicated.

    43. They renounce enjoyment of meet, they say that no one who eats meet or cheese or dairy products can be saved if they are not baptised again.

    44. They deny resurrection and say that the body that dies now will never resurrect but the spirit will.

    45. They claim that there is no purgatory. They say that there is no middle way between heaven and hell. 46. They renounce prayers which are used for the deceased inside the church.

    47. It's a death sin to kill animals or birds, also to smash eggs.

    48. They condemn blood justice which is done by worldly leaders.

    49. They condemn all oaths.

    50. They forbid giving charity, they reject and rebuff acts of mercy.
    Last edited by Mraz; 03-29-2015 at 02:50 PM.

  9. #9
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    05-27-2019 @ 12:23 AM
    Ethnicity
    Bosniak
    Ancestry
    Podrinje
    Country
    Bosnia
    Gender
    Posts
    1,354
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,176
    Given: 1,201

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    A thread about medieval history needs a section on weapons and armor.
    Swords and weapons from Medieval Bosnia.



    Sword that was found in the Neretva.


    A closer look at the hilt of the previously pictured sword.



    Stolen from Gorstaks old thread. :icon_cheesygrin:

    Motifs of swords found on Bosnian stecaks.

    Various spears and arrows from medieval Bosnia.

    Armor

    Helmets, swords, spears and a mace...


    Thanks again Gorstak

    Motifs of various shields found on stecaks.

    Motifs of soldiers with shields.
    Last edited by Mraz; 04-28-2015 at 09:31 PM.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    12-08-2018 @ 06:13 PM
    Ethnicity
    Turkish
    Ancestry
    Oğuz / Turcoman
    Country
    Turkey
    Gender
    Posts
    10,237
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,722
    Given: 1,300

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    It's widely known that Bosnian cities gave their keys to Mehmed II and Bosnia joined the Ottomans in 1463. However, that's wrong.
    Bosnia was partly first taken by Mehmet I around 1415. Later Serbs played Turks against Hungarians, they first gave Belgrade and Golubac to Hungarians without a fight. Then Hungarians consolidated their power in Belgrade. However then the Orthodox Serbs called on Turks and Murad II successfully relieved Golubac.
    Serbian despotate and Durad Brankovic became vassal and also Bosnia paid tribute to Murad II. Murad sent troops until central Bosnia in 1430s.
    There is a fetishism turning around Mehmed II because he took Constantinople. That's unfair for Mehmet I and Murad II. Especially Murad II was a true field marshall. He won virtually all pitch battles he entered and was succesful in sieges (incl. against Albanian rebels).
    Mehmet II took Constantinople but wasn't as succesful as his father Murad II militarily. Murad II is often forgotten, while he was one of top sultans.

    Siege of Golubaç


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The medieval city of Ani
    By poiuytrewq0987 in forum Armenia
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-19-2014, 06:21 PM
  2. Christians who fought in Bosnia Army during war in Bosnia
    By Gorštak in forum Bosna i Hercegovina
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 05-10-2014, 11:08 PM
  3. Medieval Bosnia armors and swords
    By Gorštak in forum Bosna i Hercegovina
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-04-2013, 05:15 PM
  4. Bosnia medieval tombstones
    By Gorštak in forum Bosna i Hercegovina
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-17-2013, 10:32 PM
  5. Medieval Bosnia
    By Hurrem sultana in forum Bosna i Hercegovina
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 07:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •