Out of Africa theory discussion

[Prisoner Of Ice]

R1b didn't come from africa, and who ever believes that it did is retarded.

I like the "from russia to africa" idea though, straight from afrocentric sites.

R1b almost certainly formed in iberia, since H mtdna formed in western europe. I think r1b was in north africa (had to be since it is all over much of africa now) and might have played a part in very early megalithic culture, but there were no black people in africa yet anyway, even if it's true. And they also originally came from europe almost for sure. Though maybe not I guess.

[Smeagol]

I like the "from russia to africa" idea though, straight from afrocentric sites.

R1b almost certainly formed in iberia, since H mtdna formed in western europe. I think r1b was in north africa (had to be since it is all over much of africa now) and might have played a part in very early megalithic culture, but there were no black people in africa yet anyway, even if it's true. And they also originally came from europe almost for sure. Though maybe not I guess.

I agree with this.

[Lock]

I read a good article not long ago about a skull found in a cave in Europe (cant remember where). The scientist did tests on it and found it to disprove the OOA theory. Sadly, someone broke into the man who discovered its office and stole it. Someone also broke into his home and stole papers on it. But luckily they had the DNA still. I will have to find the link and share it.

[Lock]

http://www.ancient-origins.net/human...-theory-001283

Found it

[Kamal900]

Dude, why do you have a hard time believing the out-of-Africa theory? Africans =/= Blacks, and the oldest negroid skull they have ever found was in Nigeria which is only 10 thousand years old. The oldest of the early Hominid skeletons was in east Africa, and really, it does makes sense for the early homo sapians sapians to have migrated from that region.

[Lock]

http://atlanteangardens.blogspot.com...-debunked.html

[Lock]

[Sacrificed Ram]

Always I see this paper a fall in laughs, such study is like try to prove that a 20 years old guy isn't father of a 30 years old man, it is obvious, you don't need none scietists and DNA tests to prove it, it is evident. A 20 years old guy in Africa cannot be the father of a 30 years old man in Europe.

I hope such study was not did with the money of taxpayers, I had think only military sector was area to give money for vagabonds... eh people without occupation.

[Lock]

[Prisoner Of Ice]

I read a good article not long ago about a skull found in a cave in Europe (cant remember where). The scientist did tests on it and found it to disprove the OOA theory. Sadly, someone broke into the man who discovered its office and stole it. Someone also broke into his home and stole papers on it. But luckily they had the DNA still. I will have to find the link and share it.

I've seen that before, but that guy is wrong. It's just greeks being greeks.

It doesn't really prove anything, but there is also no out of africa proof of any kind.

The theory is more or less falsified though because of finding neanderthal and denisova DNA. At the very least this shows multiregionalism is the main basis of evolution. The genetics just don't support out of africa unless you work very hard and have a huge bias. Since OOA has now been pushed back to 200k years ago or so being the only plausible time, even if OOA were true it really doesn't mean a thing.

The only way to prove OOA is true is to find a human with fully 'modern' DNA in ancient africa long before there's any sign of them in eurasia - so 200k years ago or so.

I'd say that OOA is already falsified by archaeology. There is no movement out of africa. Human fossils are very rare, but tools are very common. Go outside your house and start digging, and eventually you will find some arroheads or scrapers or other tools within 100 yards of your house. I guarantee it. It's really that easy to find stuff even in the USA, and in africa and europe it's about a thousand times easier.w

If any migration took place from africa, we'd already have found conclusive proof. OTOH we do have conclusive proof of many migrations into africa with direct evidence.

We also have proof of cromags going into africa as well. That is why they stopped using the term cromag, because we found that cromag is european not african. So it doesn't fit with OOA. In all time periods, the skulls inside africa have smaller brains than those outside it. In all time periods the skulls in africa have more archaic form as well.

Media and marxist educators back this crap up, otherwise it would have been thrown out long ago.

Out of Africa is pure bullshit.