Originally Posted by
monfret
again you are severely deluded.most mulattas are seen as more attractive than Iberian and med females.they have better curves,sexier hair,usually golden skin and coloured eyes,fuller lips etc you can post top tier mediterrenean females(who are almost always balkan or levantine lol)but we all know belucci is an exception not a rule.average iberian is sickly pale,no curves,bland faces.compare them to long legged balkan chicks and its no competition.
youre also wrong about nordic women being ugly and big boned,they tend to be taller,leggy and slim.sure most are average I will agree but the average in holland and germany is better than the average in Iberia.portugal has the ugliest people in europe lmao.again,if scandi chicks are the unattractive of the nordic race while baltic females are the epitome,than iberians are the unattractive of the med race while balkan women are the epitome.I see iberians all the time,the women are ugly to average,same for italian women.you said iberian women are seen as more attractive on account of being white,when thats not how mens boners work.a 7/10 mulatta------>a 5/10 white girl.to most men youre not even white ...when men think about white women they are thinking about blondes and redheads,slavic or nordic features,long legs etc not some iberian.isabelle adjani is a exception to the rule of ugly med women.if all women looked like that you could make a case,but the average med female looks nothing like that.
its clear you are jealous,and rightfully so.
Bookmarks