0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,874 Given: 12,909 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,874 Given: 12,909 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,915 Given: 27,872 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,283 Given: 769 |
The assumption that “poor people don’t reach college” is a general assumption, that of course doesn’t imply that not a single poor person reaches college. It’s just to remind that the poor struggle to access college, despite being free.
As for mestizos, I’ve never claimed that they are lazy. I don’t know where did you take that from. If that were the case, 90% of the Mexican population would be lazy and we all know that Mexicans are hard workers, in fact the highest rate of employment in the OECD.
Genetics have nothing to do with lazyness, it’s a cultural thing.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,362 Given: 11,959 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 14,915 Given: 27,872 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,362 Given: 11,959 |
MEXICO 2019
https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.ncbi....es/PMC6327376/
https://humgenomics.biomedcentral.co...246-018-0188-9
https://static-content.springer.com/...OESM1_ESM.xlsx
Population and breast cancer patients’
analysis reveals the diversity of genomic
variation of the BRCA genes in the Mexican
population
This was made with the excel in supplementary info 1
https://static-content.springer.com/...OESM1_ESM.xlsx
Thumbs Up |
Received: 12,362 Given: 11,959 |
New Mexico Mexicans 2019
Associations between ethnic identity, regionalhistory, and genomic ancestry in New Mexicans of Spanish-speaking descent
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/supp...563?scroll=top
ABSTRACT
This study examines associations between ethnic identity, regional
history, and genomic ancestry in New Mexicans of Spanish-speaking
descent (NMS). In structured interviews, we asked 507 NMS to select
from a list of eight ethnic identity terms identified in previous
research. We estimated genomic ancestry for each individual from
291,917 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and compared
genomic ancestry, age, and birthplace between groups of individuals
who identified using each ethnic identity term. Eighty-eight per cent
of NMS who identified as “Hispanic,” “Nuevomexicano/a,” and
“Spanish,” on average, were born in New Mexico, as were the vast
majority of their parents and grandparents. Thirty-three per cent of
NMS who identified as “Mexican” and “Mexican American” were born
in Mexico, as were 59 per cent of their parents and 67 per cent of
their grandparents. Average Native American and African ancestry
proportions in “Hispanic” (0.26, 0.02, respectively), “Spanish” (0.25,
0.01), and “Nuevomexicano/a” (0.24, 0.01) NMS were significantly
lower than in “Mexican American” (0.37, 0.04) NMS. Significant age
differences between older “Spanish” and younger “Nuevomexicano/
a” individuals, combined with widespread use of the term “Hispanic,”
may reflect ongoing nomenclature changes. Patterns of correspondence between ethnic identity, ethnic nomenclatures, and genomic
ancestry reflect historical patterns of migration, colonization, and
cultural change.
Last edited by Argentano; 01-22-2019 at 09:42 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,587 Given: 0 |
Esta es una buena comparativa entre la población hispana originaria del sudoeste de los actuales EEUU y los inmigrantes mexicanos más recientes. En teoría los nuevomexicanos eran similares a la población del norte de México. Sin embargo son 10 puntos % más europeos. En teoría esos mexicanos vienen también del norte de México. Yo lo que creo que indica es una amerindización del norte de México durante el siglo XX, y que una parte de los mexicanos de Nuevo México tienen ancestros de otras zonas de México, mientras que los nuevomexicanos siguen siendo 100% genéticamente como eran en el norte de México antes de las migraciones del centro-sur de México.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks