0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,614 Given: 1,554 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 610 Given: 2,309 |
southeast asians as a lot of se asians especially burmese, thai, cambodian have ancient south asian(probably dravidian) admix.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 799 Given: 291 |
Southeast asia of course.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 41,637 Given: 16,016 |
Southeast Asia.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 74 Given: 24 |
Genetically they're closer to Arabs and Europeans than to Southeast Asians
Fst matrix based on Chaubey et al 2016 comparing Naidu (Dravidians):
https://images.nature.com/original/n...ep19166-s1.pdf (pg 12)
Naidu Saudis Syrians Russians Cambodians Saudis 0.039 Syrians 0.031 0.005 Russians 0.039 0.026 0.016 Cambodians 0.061 0.090 0.083 0.081 Lahu 0.090 0.112 0.104 0.103 0.023
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,152 Given: 2,395 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 74 Given: 24 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,934 Given: 2,967 |
Southeast asians. Only some Gulf arabs have dravidian admixture, rest of arabs (Levantine, Maghrebi) don't have it. Dravidians don't need to be mongoloid for Southeast Asians to mix them.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,152 Given: 2,395 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,935 Given: 7,460 |
Proto-Dravidian came from West Asia. Also, Dravidians are mostly Caucasoid.
Even though modern Dravidians are very different from Arabs, their difference to Southeast Asia is much larger.
So I'd say Arabs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks