0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,455 Given: 813 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 346 Given: 196 |
It's impossible to say what lands Tacitus visited personally. But it doens't mean that he did not know what he wrote about. At least he was married to the daughter of Britain's governor. And yes he's right about Ireland's location. If you read his text carefully you would not have to be surprised
In the fifth year of the war Agricola, himself in the leading ship, crossed the Clota, and subdued in a series of victories tribes hitherto unknown. In that part of Britain which looks towards Ireland, he posted some troops, hoping for fresh conquests rather than fearing attack, inasmuch as Ireland, being between Britain and Spain and conveniently situated for the seas round Gaul
But, nevermind i understand your point that all of the ancient authors, including Irish did not know what were they writing about. That's it.
Nordic Iron age and Med. cranialRegarding your 2nd sentence who are the ancient Celts? Who are you comparing what to?
I'm talking about pre-historic archaeologyAlso what proof do you have for no 3. I don't agree with what you say at all. I know from Irish history that the people they were involved with were primarily the Scots, Welsh, Angles, Vikings and Normans and the latter day English. Likewise all British Isles populations were dealing with the same people. England and Wales were part of the Roman Empire but Scotland and Ireland were not.
OK, the next question. how many ancient samples there're from Ireland, England, Iberia for 3000-2500 BC?Regarding ydna L21 is present in France, Germany etc but the oldest so far has been found in England. I have no doubt they will find older L21 on the Continent with time. What you might not be aware of is that the majority subclade in Iberia is DF27 and guess where the oldest DF27 has been found? Yes German Bell Beaker
R1b wasn't found in the Neolithic. It only became dominant in the Bronze Age.
We've talked about it so many times that it makes no sense did it again. All these works are very important and very necessary, but scientific value of the pseudo-archaeological/ historical conclusions based on such a scanty data is close to zero.I'm sure I've linked these studies before but no one can discuss this topic until they read these studies. Now Bell Beaker was not Celtic but I do believe the Celts grew out of later post Bell Beaker cultures like Unetice.
You will find this quote in the paper below. The paper is called The Beaker Phenomenon and the Genomic Transformation of Northwest Europe which says it all really.
They also found no Steppe dna in the earlier neolithic people but plenty in the Bell Beakers.
http://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorx...35962.full.pdf
If you want to read up on what happened in Portugal this is an excellent paper.
The Population Genomics Of Archaeological Transition In West Iberia
http://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorx...34254.full.pdf
You really need to take an interest in these newer dna studies to understand what happened in the past.
Last edited by Fantomas; 08-22-2017 at 02:57 AM.
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
Thumbs Up |
Received: 346 Given: 196 |
I'm afraid i'll never get the unswer to such a simple question how this method of correlation, between mtdna set and pigmentation level, works?
Absolutely agreeWe can also add the linguistic and prehistoric cultural connection of celts with Mediterraneans, which related ancient celts more with south Europeans than with germanics, during the antiquity
You must be surprised, but modern British population have more Mediterranean dna admixture, than in Iron AgeAncient celtic speakers, were a different case, and for sure those who occupied nearly half of South Europe and many in central Europe were genetically closer to southern Europe
But modern celtic survivors (British celts) are definitely closer to northern Europe and absolutely not Mediterranean
Sure for whom, M.Gimbutas, W.Haak ?!The only sure is that all ie populations were equally originated from the steppe, and celts were not exception
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
Thumbs Up |
Received: 346 Given: 196 |
Of 80 Late,Middle and Late Bronze Age samples from Netherlands and Brit Isles only 20 had clearly Nordic pigmentation and 14 had blue eyes with dark or black hair ,so could be Atlantic variation of Meds . Another 46 or more than 50% had pure Mediterranean pigmentation.
It's estimated that Celts originated from tribes of Bell Beaker culture. Well, overwhelming majority of Central European Beakers were Meds as well. Just in Germany their ratio is 25 - 4 not in favour of Nordic pigmentation.
https://genetiker.wordpress.com/2018...beaker-people/
This confirms that at least half of the Celtic population were Meds. regardless what part of Europe they lived.
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,258 Given: 3,510 |
I feel very Confused. If modern British are more Mediterranean mixed than iron age British were, like you claimed, then who brought this med admixture in Britain, vikings?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,957 Given: 7,024 |
Celts were from the Hallstatt culture.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 527 Given: 1,510 |
It’s an interesting theory. My haplogroup actually comes from eastern Spain but all of my known heritage of my Paternal direct lineage comes from southwest Germany (inhabited by descendants of Celts and Germanics). Not sure if that’s relavent tonthis because my haplogroup might be younger than this migration of Celts from Spain.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,848 Given: 3,647 |
No. Except ligurians. Who are probably celts due to cultural shifts
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks