Q&A: Ask a Nationalist!

[Smitty]

Well, Missouri is my ideological homeland, but there is still Jewing to be done in ultra-conservative Britain.

Fortunately for Missouri, East St. Louis is not representative of Missouri.

[Watch_Owl]

What city do you live in?

[Longbowman]

Fortunately for Missouri, East St. Louis is not representative of Missouri.

Either way why you'd think I'd move to Missouri is beyond me

[Smitty]

Either way why you'd think I'd move to Missouri is beyond me

Agreed. You don't strike me as someone who would enjoy Missourian culture. I think his point was that East St. Louis, like many large, American cities, is a liberal Petri dish. Therefore, a liberal like you (if you are) should feel at home there.

[RandomlyRenounced]

Would you agree nationalism is going the entirely wrong way? We have to start campaigning for break away states and actually fighting migration with migration ourselves, not trying to take back entire countries, especially not the US.

Also, what is your opinion on giving up on the USA entirely so the liberals do actually have a place to go if they wanna be around other races? I'm Canadian but I really don't give the slightest shit about this country, I care about mother Europe.

One more thing. Outing the Jew, good or bad? I think there's no denying the role Jews are playing but I just don't see the point of pointing that out. It doesn't do anything. Oh and, who is a bigger threat to white nationalism, Jews or low IQ lower class nationalists/neo-Nazis who give us a bad image?

Okay, one more.. Why don't liberals and Longbowmanoids voluntarily move to say, East St. Louis, MO, if that's what they want for the future? Confusing.

1. In Europe, I think Nationalism is going in a positive direction, albeit slowly. In the United States I agree that migration could be a solution in theory, but in practice you have the concept of "White Flight." Non-Whites pour into the cities, and White folk flee to suburbs. The newly non-White cities crumble and the non-Whites chase the Whites to the suburbs. Then Whites flee to the Country, etc. I think the PLE concept is clever, but it is far too slow to actually save a large land mass. The United States is thoroughly screwed from a Nationalist perspective.

Like you say, our hope lies in the breaking up of the Union, but taking over an entire State with organized migration is tricky, and getting enough Nationalists to pull it off is next to impossible.

2. Such areas already exist (Brazil for example), but unless there is a miracle, the United States is going to die anyways, so why not?

3. The thing with the Jews is that lashing out against them makes you look like a Nazi, and there is no entity in history more bemoaned than the Nazis in the West. I think that Jews should be given an option to migrate back to Israel voluntarily, and to receive financial support in doing so from the government. I think that Jews are more threatening to White Nationalism, but only because of the Elite among them that own mediums of Mass Media.

4. Liberals don't really want diversity. They want to force others to accept diversity, and act as if they are the epitome of goodness for doing so.

Do you think the words "Nationalism" and "Nationalist" are too vague to adequately describe any sort of political position?

Do you agree any identity is going to necessarily be a sort of Nationalism, even if they pertain to things not essentially related to a specific race or culture, like economic ideology or even Humanist ideology?

Nationalist can be pretty vague, but for the most part I think it gets the point across.

Most people can agree with some element or another of Nationalism, but that isn't really the same as being a Nationalist.

I'm just joking around and giving free bumps while doing it. Calm down.

I don't appreciate the thumb-downs, but whatever lets you sleep at night.

What city do you live in?

I don't live in a city, I live in a semi-rural area in Northern Alabama.

[Watch_Owl]

What are the universal questions that are laid down?

[RandomlyRenounced]

What are the universal questions that are laid down?

Could you rephrase the question? Are you talking about set-in-stone nationalist ideologies?

[Watch_Owl]

Could you rephrase the question? Are you talking about set-in-stone nationalist ideologies?

Yes.

[RandomlyRenounced]

Yes.

There really are none aside from anti-globalism, pro-self determination, anti-immigration, and either a mild or negative view of racial mixing.

Sort of like how the word "Leftist" is a loose definition of people who tend to believe in certain things, but can disagree with certain ideas within the group.

Nationalists are not necessarily hive-minded.

[Smitty]

There really are none aside from anti-globalism, pro-self determination, anti-immigration, and either a mild or negative view of racial mixing.

Sort of like how the word "Leftist" is a loose definition of people who tend to believe in certain things, but can disagree with certain ideas within the group.

Nationalists are not necessarily hive-minded.

So is your particular view more along the lines of White Nationalism? You seem to be more concerned with racial segregation than the preservation of America itself, if I'm not mistaken.