Should missionaries, corporations , tourists, other outsiders be expel from Amazon and other areas?

[Maguzanci]

Considering the fact of how missionaries, corporations, tourists, government officials and other outside influence can have negative impact on the indigenous belief system and lifestyle of many tribal people, should they be expel from areas with high number of indigenous groups like Amazon rainforest, West Papua and certain parts of Africa?
What do you think about this? Please discuss.

[Maguzanci]

No one?

[aksakallicocuk]

Yes. They must stop messing with tribes.

[Maguzanci]

Yes. They must stop messing with tribes.

Thank you. Are there still Turkic indigenous belief system today?

[aksakallicocuk]

Thank you. Are there still Turkic indigenous belief system today?

Like what?

There are tribes still migrating and living in yurts among nearly every turkic people.

But their numbers are reducing.

Like my grandmothers tribe settled in 1890 by force. They were nomadic back then. Her grandfather born in a yurt.

[Tekken]

First you have to abolish globalization.
A pretty big endeavour.

But say if the UN Human rights council abolishes all foreign contact with these people, then I declare the same right to be legitimate in Europe, and all non-Whites to be expelled now.

[SupaThug]

No,only illegal loggers should.

[Wadaad]

The way the question is posited, the Amazonians arent considered people with opinions on this matter. Like if we discussing hunters in a nature reserve or something, and no need to bring up the animals' opinions.

IMO, if the Amazonian tribals want them out...they should leave. Bottom line, why arent the tribals being asked of their opinion? They are humans and have observed the phenomona increase, and as people have already formed opinions and sentiments regarding this situation...so let's ask them.

[Silk]

Yes.

[sean]

Yes.

I don't want to go in there without a fucking spacesuit, but I support it. The tribes in the Amazon rainforest only continue to exist because the Brazilian government has a specific policy not to interfere.

In fact, new research is uncovering that the Amazon has undergone drastic change in makeup from humans encouraging edible plants to grow throughout the rainforest over thousands of years.

If you look at every farm that's lasted and evolved over thousands of years, you'd notice that it's a food forest, that food is harvested from productive trees that mimic natural ecosystems. The Amazon Rainforest is a good example of such a farm. The indigenous people there actually created their own highly fertile soil.

Agribusiness want to raze down the Amazon rainforest and replace it with onions fields, and be given the right to kill whoever try to stop them to do so (mostly indigenous people and MST landless workers' movement). Manufacturers just want sweatshops in Brazil.

The rubber boom and the associated need for a large workforce had a significant negative effect on the indigenous population across Brazil, Peru, Ecuador and Colombia. As rubber plantations grew, labour shortages increased.

The rubber barons rounded up all the Indians and forced them to tap rubber out of the trees. One plantation started with 50,000 Indians but, when discovered, only 8,000 were still alive. Slavery and systematic brutality were widespread, and in some areas, 90% of the Indian population was wiped out. These rubber plantations were part of the Brazilian rubber market, which declined as rubber plantations in Southeast Asia became more effective.