0

Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
R-S116 (P312)
Parent Clade: R-P310(S129)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2
R-U152 (S28)
Parent Clade: S116 (P312)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2d
R-U106 (S21/M405)
Parent Clade: P310 (S129)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a1
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,971 Given: 1,036 |
Here is the entire set :
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 433 Given: 0 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,971 Given: 1,036 |
Here is an interesting map of the types of R1b and its frequencies out of all the R1b, sorry there is no Norway :
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
http://davidkfaux.org/Angles_England_R_U152.pdfAn unpublished research study of Norway found that the percentage of R-U106 made up
about 65% of the R-M269 (R1b1b2) group. Ten percent were R-U152, but all from the
southeast of the country north of Jutland (Vestfold, the Vik and surrounding Oslofjord).
The link below contains numbers of R-U106 per European nation; Norway is included.
Link: http://www.weston-genealogy.net/R_U1...p_density.html
This is all I can find for Norway, sorry; I am not sure how reliable it is.
I would imagine that R-U106 either makes up the majority of R1b in Scandinavia, or is the most numerous subclade of R1b found.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
Sampling
R-M73
Parent Clade:R-P297
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b1
R-M269
Parent Clade: R-P297
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2
R-L23*
Parent Clade: R-M269
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a*
R-M412 (L51)
Parent Clade: R-L23
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1
R-P310 (S129,L11)
Parent Clade: R-M412
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a
R-P310* (L11*)
Parent Clade: R-P310
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a*
R-U106 (S21/M405)
Parent Clade: P310 (S129)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a1
R-P312 (S116)
Parent Clade: R-P310(S129)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2
R-P312* (S116*)
Parent Clade: R-P312 (S116)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2*
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
R-U152 (S28)
Parent Clade: P312 (S116)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2d
R-M529 (S145,L21)
Parent Clade: P312 (S116)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2f
R-M529 xR-M222
R-M222
Parent Clade: R-M529 (S145,L21)
Phylogenetic name:R1b1b2a1a2f2
PCA plot by R1b Subclades
PCA plot by defined populations
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
No, it shouldn't. Neither really matter very much... Both y and mtDNA haplos are only really useful for studying ancient populations migrations, and a handful of other things. yDNA was studied more because it wasn't until more recently that we even COULD study mtDNA, not because of some big anti woman conspiracy...
The truth is autosomal data is what matters when studying personal ancestry, not allosomal (haplogroup) data. Haplogroup data will only tell you about one single ancestor, thousands of years ago directly up the male or female line. Autosomal DNA is what denotes actual genetic composition.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 32 Given: 0 |
Please avoid spinning in the same mud. And keep the mudslinging to the Big Fight.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks