How to explain the nordic race domination over europe ?

**Deus Patriae** · 08-28-2016, 12:15 PM

Since the end of the roman empire, the dominating class in Europe is nordic, dolichocephalic, with lower testosterone level, tall, slim and sharp whereas the worker class is less nordic, brachycephalic, with higher testoterone level, shorter and broader.

122_001.jpg
A dominating aristocrat military

pc Vrlika.jpg
A dominated farmer

How is it possible ? It seems to me that if the farmer blow on the military, the military will fly away. The pictures are a bit caricatural, but it's the idea. Do the nordics who conquered Europe were the same than the delicates ones of the last centuries ? One can think it's superior intellect which has allowed domination, but look at the faces of almost all the most important scientists of the last centuries, many are german, french, english, etc.. but they are not nordic aristocrats, they are almost all stocky guys from their local rude farmer race.

So what ? Is it because they are less individualists and better organized ?

**~~Antimage~~** · 08-28-2016, 12:25 PM

It's ridiculous how often "this ethnicity is low t, that ethnicity is high t" is thrown around without any evidence.

**Deus Patriae** · 08-28-2016, 12:37 PM

Originally Posted by Gambit

It's ridiculous how often "this ethnicity is low t, that ethnicity is high t" is thrown around without any evidence.

Do you have some study about this ?

Else, this picture summarizes all :
3c11e25ac70a782434c67835cddb8cc5.jpg

**Deus Patriae** · 08-28-2016, 01:29 PM

Still the same story which repeats,

Homo sapiens vs neandertal
Indo-europeans vs neolitic farmers (homo sapiens and neandertal offspring)
Nordics vs celtics (indo-european and neolitic farmers offspring)
I forget 2 forbiden lines

Nomad, weak but cohesive predators vs plentiful of sedentary, strong but isolated individuals.

And after some time the dominating class lose its cohesion and they cross, creating both a new weak but cohesive parasitic class and a new strong worker class, and the scheme applies again, etc..

And european individuals become still weaker.

**RN97** · 08-28-2016, 01:35 PM

If this is supposed to be so true and not just nordicist BS. How come non-nordic people started civilization? How come non-nordics were behind lots of great civilizations?
"All the great seafaring civilisations from the middle Bronze Age to the Iron Age were dominated by J2 men." http://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_J2_Y-DNA.shtml
" Current thinking is that there was no single "cradle", but several civilizations that developed independently, of which the Near Eastern Neolithics, Mesopotamia and Egypt, were the first" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization

**Rosso77** · 08-28-2016, 01:47 PM

The Romans got cucked as they gave rights to women and migrants, then the nordics flooded. There's a book about it, though I can't recall its name and would appreciate very much if someone knew what is it.