How to explain the nordic race domination over europe ?

[Aëlwenn]

No one on this fórum seems to have read Carleton Coon, the so called Nordic Race
and its iron age keltic variant is depigmented Mediterranean, unlike peasant unreduced cromagnids and balto/alpinoid types. Read anthropology first and post later, fucktards.

Funny you say that, when we know that modern anthropology denies completely Coon and consort, their methods of classification are completely wrong, and that several recent scientific studies have shown, as affirmed Boas, the index cephalic so important to Coon, is in any case related to race or ethnicity, but the influence of the environment, therefore quote a nordiciste charlatan and pro- racist trend as Coon, that's what

[Not a Cop]

No one on this fórum seems to have read Carleton Coon, the so called Nordic Race
and its iron age keltic variant is depigmented Mediterranean, unlike peasant unreduced cromagnids and balto/alpinoid types. Read anthropology first and post later, fucktards.

Another piece of retarded anthro-onanism from you.

Coon shouldn't be preached like a bible nowdays, he was a great scientiest, but never had ability to get the data we have now.

Anyway here is something for you, a description of Yamnaya anthropological type, whom are now widely known as Proto-Indo-Europeans:

Для населения ямной культуры характерны черепа с низким и ортогнатным лицом, низкими орбитами, сильно выступающим носом, сильно наклонным лбом и мощными надбровными дугами

- Population of Yamnaya culture were characterised by skulls will low orthognathic faces, low orbits, promitent nose, strongly sloping forehead and strong browridges.

All this points to domination of what people call here unreduced cromagnoid traits.

[Akragas]

They conquered Sicily but so did everyone else so I don't think it matters.....

[Sebastianus Rex]

Funny you say that, when we know that modern anthropology denies completely Coon and consort, their methods of classification are completely wrong, and that several recent scientific studies have shown, as affirmed Boas, the index cephalic so important to Coon, is in any case related to race or ethnicity, but the influence of the environment, therefore quote a nordiciste charlatan and pro- racist trend as Coon, that's what

Coon has not been archelogically revoked, in fact modern science corroborates many of his theories.

And accusing Carleton Coon of "charlatanism", "racism" and "nordicism" is absolutely ridiculous. Have you ever read the races of Europe ? On what ground you form those accusations ?

Another piece of retarded anthro-onanism from you.

Coon shouldn't be preached like a bible nowdays, he was a great scientiest, but never had ability to get the data we have now.

Anyway here is something for you, a description of Yamnaya anthropological type, whom are now widely known as Proto-Indo-Europeans:

Для населения ямной культуры характерны черепа с низким и ортогнатным лицом, низкими орбитами, сильно выступающим носом, сильно наклонным лбом и мощными надбровными дугами

- Population of Yamnaya culture were characterised by skulls will low orthognathic faces, low orbits, promitent nose, strongly sloping forehead and strong browridges.

All this points to domination of what people call here unreduced cromagnoid traits.

I sense some form of hypebrachychephalic autism...in what that disproves Carleton Coon conclusions that the Nordic type is a depigmented branch of the Mediterranean racial stock unrelated in origin to the large headed Paleolithic Survivors ?

And in what that disproves the OP observation that the ruling elites of European societies after the fall of the Roman Empire (not in primitive times) belong mostly to tendencially dolichocephalic Nordic types ? Just prospect a little about european aristocracy and nobility and you'll realize those types are clearly overepresented.

[Poise n Pen]

Another piece of retarded anthro-onanism from you.

Coon shouldn't be preached like a bible nowdays, he was a great scientiest, but never had ability to get the data we have now.

Anyway here is something for you, a description of Yamnaya anthropological type, whom are now widely known as Proto-Indo-Europeans:

Для населения ямной культуры характерны черепа с низким и ортогнатным лицом, низкими орбитами, сильно выступающим носом, сильно наклонным лбом и мощными надбровными дугами

- Population of Yamnaya culture were characterised by skulls will low orthognathic faces, low orbits, promitent nose, strongly sloping forehead and strong browridges.

All this points to domination of what people call here unreduced cromagnoid traits.

Cromags have a vertical forehead and more modern eyebrows.

They were about half cromag, half something else. But the later bronze age cultures were fully cromag and so is bell beaker type. WOW MAGIC. They went from half cromag to full cromag, a true miracle. Just like they went from half whte everything to full white everything.

Or the obvious is the truth and they are not the origin of the western r1b.

[Defiance]

We had a thread some years ago and we established that the average roman(from Rome proper) was either a Med or Nordid with Cromagnoid and Dinarid/Alpinid slight vibe.

Another Nordo-CM roman emperor.Most statues from ancient Rome and Greece were blonde&blue eyed.

No. That looks more like me than it does the typical Nordid. The same can probably be said for the majority of other Ancient Romans as well.

[Chocolate_Hound]

Nordics are quite isolated from Europe, Sweden has remained mostly neutral especially during Cold War. They kind of live in their own world.