0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,858 Given: 1,530 |
Speculations. There is no proof whatsoever. The Oghur-speaking branch of the Turks did not teleport themselves to Volga-Ural for sure, there must have been some connection between the Oghur and other Turkic branches, too bad that the Oghur branch ruins everything.
Well, your opinion on this matter means nothing as you are not a linguist nor an archeologist. You are just a biased member (just like me) who lacks basic historical knowledge (IE tribes conquering Turkic tribes LEL).
Kum4 might be half CHG half Anatolia_Neolithic too, it would make sense (bronze age CHG expansion). CHG has a good chunk of ANE.
Kum4
puntDNAL K12 Modern
Population
Sub-Saharan -
Amerindian 13.91
South_Asian -
Near_East -
Siberian -
European_HG -
Caucasus_HG 34.56
South_African_HG -
Anatolian_NF 51.54
East_Asian -
Oceanian -
Beringian -
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Danishmend do not provoke me, if you have arguments (which I think you don't) then discuss it! bedelini ödersin...
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,858 Given: 1,530 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,840 Given: 1,720 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,923 Given: 18,997 |
Not only Gedmatch shows that Kum4 had Steppe admixture.
This sample was published in 2 scientific publications as well:
1) Omrak et al. 2016 - http://www.cell.com/current-biology/...2815%2901516-X
2) Hofmanová et al. 2016 - http://www.pnas.org/content/113/25/6886.full
Graph from Hofmanová - yellow is Yamnaya admixture, look at Kumtepe4 and 6:
See also pages 8-9 and map from Fig. 2. from this paper by David W. Anthony:
http://www.jolr.ru/files/(104)jlr2013-9(1-21).pdf
They surely did not expand into Central Anatolia immediately after that.
But Kumtepe is located near the Dardanelles, very close to the Balkans:
And settlers of Kumtepe B culture later established the city-state of Troy. So it means, that Trojans were Indo-European (probably part of Anatolian branch of IE). This is also in agreement with the fact, that Paris and Priam are considered by linguists to be Indo-European given names.
I guess that their language got extinct after the destruction of Troy by Greeks:
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,858 Given: 1,530 |
You are a member of Anthrogenica as far as I know (Tomenable?), you must have read this thread. http://www.anthrogenica.com/showthre...natolia-Or-not
Although I support the steppe/Yamnaya theory I'm skeptical about this sample's results and I have reasons to be so. Kum4's results are weird, every calculator says something else. On some calculators Kum4 comes up as 1/2 CHG 1/2 Anatolia_Neolithic whereas on others some Steppe-related components appear. The sample even scores 10% Pygmy on one of the calculators.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,410 Given: 6,858 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,447 Given: 687 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks