Are Pashtuns closer to North Indians or Kurds?

[MS85]

You can't use fucking e-linguistics as an example of similarities, its largely based on age, go compare Old Persian with Avestan their distance half as much as Kurdish, "Aryan" my ass.

Can we get his fucking retard banned?

Hahahah. You told me that Avestan was closer to Balto-Slavic languages than to Kurdish. The only fake person with fake account are you here.


Distance between Avestan and Persian is very small, it is 34,5

Avestan is closer to Persian than to Kurdish. I never denied that!

http://elinguistics.net/Compare_Lang...tan&Order=Calc


So, Kurdish is not Aryan? That's new, lol!

[MS85]

But we all know that Kurdish is more 'pure' than Persian. Kurdish has still got (proto-Indo-Iranian) ergativity, while Persian lost it a long time ago.

Kurdish as a Northwest Iranian language is an ARYAN language. And it is the 'purest' modern Aryan language that exists and is spoken!

[Pahli]

But we all know that Kurdish is more 'pure' than Persian. Kurdish has still got (proto-Indo-Iranian) ergativity, while Persian lost it a long time ago.

Kurdish as a Northwest Iranian language is an ARYAN language. And it is the 'purest' modern Aryan language that exists and is spoken!

A lot of people will disagree, Proto-Indo-Iranian is the "purest" Aryan language, not a 4000 year old descendant with only 10% of its features and vocabulary

[MS85]

A lot of people will disagree, Proto-Indo-Iranian is the "purest" Aryan language, not a 4000 year old descendant with only 10% of its features and vocabulary

This is a stupid comparison! Proto-Indo-Iranian doesn't exist! It was spoken maybe 7000 years ago. But it is evolved into Kurdish/modern Aryan. There is a continuous evolution of everything, human races and human languages. Our human languages are becoming more modern with the age.

I was not talking about death languages. I was talking about living spoken languages. Kurdish is an Aryan language. It is not like mixed Indic/Dravidian versus Vedic Sanskrit.

Kurdish as Aryan language is still very pure, we Kurds are very pure Aryans. Our DNA didn't change for the last 3000 years. We as isolated people in our Aryan Zagros mountains preserved our Aryan language. Why do you think there are so many Kurdish dialects? It is because of the moutnains. Our mountains preserved our Aryan language.


This map shows the regions of the world where Avestan (Parsi) is still used in the religious rites of Zoroastrianism (red circles). Avestan comes from the Iranian sub-branch of the Indo-Iranian branch of Indo-European languages. Avesta is most closely related to Baluchi, Kurdish, Pashto, and the extinct language of Sogdian. It is somewhat more distantly related to Old Persian and Persian.

https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/IE_Satem_Avestan.html


In general it is considered by the academics that Kurdish is very close to Avestan. But Avestan was also very close to the ancient Old Persian. And there is also a reason why modern Persian is as close to Avestan and Kurdish. That's because most Persians were Zoroastrians. And Parsi incorporated many Zend-Avestan/Parsi words into Persian. While most Kurds, at least Kurmanji Kurds who belong to the majority to the Kurds, were Ezdi/Mitraists.

[Marmara]

Purest Aryans were Sintasha Proto-Indo-Iranians.

Compare your genetics with them to know how much Aryan you are.

[MS85]

Purest Aryans were Sintasha Proto-Indo-Iranians.

Compare your genetics with them to know how much Aryan you are.

No, purest Aryans are Turks from Constantinople.

[Pahli]

Purest Aryans were Sintasha Proto-Indo-Iranians.

Compare your genetics with them to know how much Aryan you are.

Don't even try, this guy is obsessed with everything "Kurdish"

[Leto]

Don't even try, this guy is obsessed with everything "Kurdish"

He needs to see this Aryan Afghan. The guy is partially from Badakhshan as far as I know (someone said where exactly he is from)
Aryan Afghan GEDmatch Results

[Kyp]

He needs to see this Aryan Afghan. The guy is partially from Badakhshan as far as I know (someone said where exactly he is from)
Aryan Afghan GEDmatch Results

http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2018/0...obviously.html'
or this

[Babak]

My man, we are free to believe whatever we want. I'm just providing you folks with scientific data and facts!

The 'theory' you think is right works according to me only for eastern Iranian Scythian invasion of India around 1500BC.
Proto-East Iranian BMAC was for more than 85% native Iranian.

Steppes related ancestry in Kurdistan predate any Yamnaya by thousands of years. We have already data from the ancient Armenian and Iranian plateau and it is much more likely that Steppes related ancestry is very ancient and just native to Kurdistan for thousands of years.

Until people can PROVE me a better alternative, I would rather believe my own intuition/observation and knowledge.

So whats this then:


"A significant section of the archaeologists are more inclined to see the culture as begun by farmers in the Near Eastern Neolithic tradition, but infiltrated by Indo-Iranian speakers from the Andronovo culture in its late phase, creating a hybrid. In this perspective, Proto-Indo-Aryan developed within the composite culture before moving south into the Indian subcontinent."[18] As James P. Mallory phrased it:

"It has become increasingly clear that if one wishes to argue for Indo-Iranian migrations from the steppe lands south into the historical seats of the Iranians and Indo-Aryans that these steppe cultures were transformed as they passed through a membrane of Central Asian urbanism. The fact that typical steppe wares are found on BMAC sites and that intrusive BMAC material is subsequently found further to the south in Iran, Afghanistan, Nepal, India and Pakistan, may suggest then the subsequent movement of Indo-Iranian-speakers after they had adopted the culture of the BMAC.[20]"



It looks like Indo-Iranians were Bmacized before they had any contact with Iran, which explains why they scored half Iran-neo.