| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 2,980 Given: 1,061 |
What do you mean, that they are low or high ?Originally Posted by Soten
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,736 Given: 8,694 |
Roman legionnaires from France!
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25 Given: 0 |
The 4 submitted Swedes:
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25 Given: 0 |
They seemed rather high for being on the other side of Europe, not the Atlantic side.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 9,736 Given: 8,694 |
They claim to be descended from Roman soldiers, looks like it. How else would a Romance language be there anyway.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25 Given: 0 |
10 of the Orcadians:
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 433 Given: 0 |
Overall they are much more "East European" than the Norwegians,
could you make one with the Swedes Eurasian admixture?
Last edited by Pallantides; 10-07-2010 at 01:47 PM.
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25 Given: 0 |
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 25 Given: 0 |
Why are the Lithuanians not on the Eurasian excel sheet?
| Thumbs Up |
| Received: 433 Given: 0 |
It seems NO1 and SE1 are the most West Eurasian out of the Scandinavians and SE3 have the most North Eurasian and Proto N-Eurasian admixture.
Overall Norwegians seem to have less North Eurasian and Proto Eurasian admixture than the Swedes atleast going by these results.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks