Classify Turkish-Bulgarian politician

[poiuytrewq0987]

He has nothing to do with average Bulgarian, first check the mirror and then my sig.

And Turks are phenotypically and genetically identical to the Turks who defeated the Byzantines at Manzikert? Get real.

[poiuytrewq0987]

[poiuytrewq0987]

[Pennywise]

Posting a Chinese actor who plays a Mongol Khan in order to represent the Oghuz Turks of West proves how imbecile are you my Bulgarian gpysy friend. Lel

[poiuytrewq0987]

Posting a Chinese actor who plays a Mongol Khan in order to represent the Oghuz Turks of West proves how imbecile are you my Bulgarian gpysy friend. Lel

It's called making a point. The Turks were fully mongoloid until they arrived in the MENA region and mixed with the locals. The first ones to mix and become assimilated by Turks were Iranic peoples in Central Asia, then eventually the Anatolian leftovers. This is an accepted fact by just about everybody except for Turks, of course. You can take a look at Kazakhs who are the least Iranic-influenced people in Central Asia and many of them look fully mongoloid.

[Grishnack]

Alpine plus pseudo-Turanid

[Pennywise]

It's called making a point.

You are making your point over false examples.

The Turks were fully mongoloid until they arrived in the MENA region and mixed with the locals.

No they weren't. Most of the remains of mediveal Turkic peoples found in Central Asia show that they were Europo-Mongoloid. Oghuz Turks who first came to Anatolia were one of the most Europoid influenced Turkic peoples. It's a myth that never gonna change among the anthrotards like you.

The first ones to mix and become assimilated by Turks were Iranic peoples in Central Asia, then eventually the Anatolian leftovers.

Central Asian Iranics were not assimilated but mixed with the Turkic peoples. Good chunk of them still remain their Iranic idendity in Central Asia.

This is an accepted fact by just about everybody except for Turks, of course. You can take a look at Kazakhs who are the least Iranic-influenced people in Central Asia and many of them look fully mongoloid.

Literally the half of the tribes that consisted modern day Kazakhs were Mongolic. They're a post-Mongol and relatively recent nation that emerged in the 16th century and they are in no where near to represent "true Turkic peoples" that invented in your mind.

[Danishmend]

And Turks are phenotypically and genetically identical to the Turks who defeated the Byzantines at Manzikert? Get real.

So said an E1b1b neolithic leftover who speaks Slavic.

Turks are not identical to Seljuk-period Turks, neither are you identical to the migrating Slavs. That's how it works, people mix. Why do you think none of you modern IE-speakers resemble PIE-related cultures genetically?

It's called making a point. The Turks were fully mongoloid until they arrived in the MENA region

Only in your wet E1b1b dreams. Not even Yakuts in Northeast Siberia are fully mongoloid you clueless pseudo-Slav, unlike their non-Turkic native Siberian neighbours. The Altai samples (from Iron Age) turned out to be genetically Eurasian and resemble modern Bashkirs. Say goodbye to your Eskimo-like proto-Turks. It is extremely stupid to assume that proto-Turks from the heart of Eurasia were 100% East Eurasian, given the fact that Yamnaya culture (supposed Proto Indo-European, which is much older than proto-Turkic) was a mixture of various ancestral populations.


There is an obvious continuity between Oghuz-speakers of Anatolia (Turks) and Central Asia (Turkmens). Keep posting Mongol actors as much as you want, but it looks funny because you are a "Slav" with E1b1b haplogroup and Greek-like autosomal makeup.


Near East K13 calculator
Yörüks: recently settled or nomadic Turks of Turkey

	SE_ASIAN	ANATOLIA_NEOLITHIC	CHG_EEF	POLAR	EHG	SUB_SAHARAN	IRAN_NEOLITHIC	KARITIANA	ANCESTRAL_INDIAN	NATUFIAN	SIBERIAN	PAPUAN	SHG_WHG
Yörük 1	7.60	13.03	24.05	1.33	5.65	0	18.68	0	2.75	13.46	9.48	0.90	3.06
Yörük 2	6.50	15.19	23.20	0.80	7.27	0	20.15	0	2.10	10.01	9.12	1.25	4.40
Turkish	3.20	14.09	29.67	1.50	5.79	0.10	21.48	0.90	0.60	12.29	6.19	0.30	3.90
Turkish_Balıkesir	5.08	13.96	30.11	0.50	4.49	0.30	22.23	0.70	0.70	9.37	8.28	0.70	3.59
Turkish_Kayseri	2.80	13.61	29.67	0.80	3.80	0	27.63	0.40	1.50	15.92	4.10	0.40	2.00
Turkish_Istanbul	3.30	13.50	32.20	0.60	6.30	0.10	21.90	0.60	2.00	11.80	3.60	0.40	3.70
Turkish_Aydın	4.70	12.70	28.20	0.70	3.80	0.40	22.90	1.10	0.70	11.90	9.10	0.50	3.30
Turkmen	11.30	4.80	17.60	1.90	8.70	0.20	21.20	0.50	6.50	7.50	16.90	0.70	2.20

You can take a look at Kazakhs who are the least Iranic-influenced people in Central Asia and many of them look fully mongoloid.

Kazakhs emerged from a mixture of Kipchak and Mongol tribes after the Mongol Invasion, many Kazakh tribes still keep their Mongolian names (such as Dughlat, Jalayir, Naiman etc). They are not pure Turks or something as you anthrotards with no historical knowledge try to portray them.

It is so obvious that even fucking Wikipedia mentions it.

The Kazakhs are descendants of the Turkic and medieval Mongol tribes – Argyns, Dughlats, Naimans, Jalairs, Khazars, Qarluqs; and of the Kipchaks and Cumans,[22][23]

[poiuytrewq0987]

Turks cluster with Armenians and Iranians, brah.

2dkweaw.jpg

[Danishmend]

Kazakhs are also the only Turkic population that has significant proportion of haplogroup C. Guess why.
[/QUOTE]