Ancient Hunnic chieftain had Y-DNA haplogroup L

**Peterski** · 11-26-2016, 03:53 PM

Originally Posted by Rethel

Problem is, that between Trzcieniec and historical Slavs is a 1500-2000 years break.
People who formed Slavs, or Trzcieniec, could during that time be illirizied, keltizied,
iranizied, germanizied and again slavizied - not all of course, but partially.

But Balts were there all of the time.

Proto-Slavs were genetically close to modern Balts, but maybe with more of Caucasian admixture.

Basically 75% Lithuanian + 25% Circassian = hypothetical Proto-Slav.

**~~LoLeL~~** · 11-26-2016, 03:53 PM

Maybe these "L" Huns were some Parthians. Possible or impossible? Because I browsed this forum last year (before crash) and there was a member who claimed L is related to Dahae/Parthian.

**Afshar** · 11-28-2016, 07:14 AM

I cannot seem to find data on the Argyn L haplogroups, can someone share it if they have the data?
Kazakh L is almost exclusive to Tatars.

**~~Grab the Gauge~~** · 11-28-2016, 07:23 AM

Prior to the rise of the international Anglo-American hegemony, Europe was nothing but a seminal spittoon for Mongoloid males. Guys, please just accept this reality for what it was and stop pretending it was Arabs or Slavs. It was this guy:

You weak, weak fucking beta males. How could you not have the vitality to defend your homelands?

**~~Böri~~** · 11-28-2016, 07:25 AM

Litvin is obvious Butlerking he likes troll Türks

Originally Posted by Grab the Gauge

Prior to the rise of the international Anglo-Saxon hegemony, Europe was nothing but a seminal spittoon for Mongoloid males. Guys, please just accept this reality for what it was and stop pretending it was Arabs or Slavs. It was this guy:

You weak, weak fucking beta males. How could you not have the vitality to defend your homelands?

This guy Red Army Buriat (Mongol) soldier?

**Pahli** · 11-28-2016, 07:44 AM

Huge kek, Hunnic cheiftain aka. Gedrosian nigga

**~~LoLeL~~** · 11-28-2016, 08:16 AM

Originally Posted by Zoran

Huge kek, Hunnic cheiftain aka. Gedrosian nigga

I think it just confirms that Huns were a union of different Eurasian tribes and Huns were not a specific people. As I said, the only strange thing about this chieftain is his background. Which ancient tribe/region and the closest modern ethnic groups to him.

Just google Red Huns, White Huns, Black Huns, and other X Huns... Seems "Hun" was a cool name in that era.

**Pahli** · 11-28-2016, 08:20 AM

Originally Posted by The Nerd

I think it just confirms that Huns were a union of different Eurasian tribes and Huns were not a specific people. As I said, the only strange thing about this chieftain is his background. Which ancient tribe/region and the closest modern ethnic groups to him.

Just google Red Huns, White Huns, Black Huns, and other X Huns... Seems "Hun" was a cool name in that era.

They had shitloads of ethnicities, they weren't only Turkic.

**~~LoLeL~~** · 11-28-2016, 08:35 AM

Originally Posted by Zoran

They had shitloads of ethnicities, they weren't only Turkic.

Yeah, Cimmerians, Huns and Scythians were not specific people. For example, there are many different tribes labeled as Scythian and Sarmatian. Antes labeled as "Sarmatian", but it seems they were early Slavs. So I prefer to avoid using terms like Indo-European, Iranic, Uralic, Finno-Ugric, Turkic, Slavic and etc for them.