The Random Thoughts/Notes Thread

[serenesam]

How does one explain the low White birth rate? Could it have something to with individualism? Could it be that White individuals care more about themselves than to have White children?

Is individualism actually a double-edged sword in that people become too focused on themselves to the point where fragmentation of the White race is a natural consequent? Think about for example, some White women who are all about “independence” and have the “I don’t need a man attitude.”

[crazyladybutterfly]

How does one explain the low White birth rate? Could it have something to with individualism? Could it be that White individuals care more about themselves than to have White children?

Is individualism actually a double-edged sword in that people become too focused on themselves to the point where fragmentation of the White race is a natural consequent? Think about for example, some White women who are all about “independence” and have the “I don’t need a man attitude.”

i dont think the i dont need a man attitude is that much damaging, it s sad when smart and healthy ladies dont reproduce though ... they should be encouraged but not forced.

even with the growing number of childfree individuals i still dont think they re a threat . the issue is more about people who want children and have them too late and too few .
well it isnt exactly about having kids in your 30s , but more about having high standards of parenting and to wait till 30 before the first child.

nowadays western and asian people are overly concerned about giving HIGH standards of living to the kids , which includes not just giving food, roof, love and education.. but also being able to send your child to expensive and often useless courses , buying the child expensive toys and even fragile technology to 5 years olds.

so they often wait till they reach an age when they should already have an adolescent child , to have the first child ... once they have the first kid they realize that even after waiting so long they cant easily afford the ideal childhood in their warped mind ... so they often dont have a second child as the parents are too busy paying the bills and overworking while leaving the kid alone.

if people started to have kids in the early 20s in their 30s they d already have grown up children and desire to have a baby again as they d miss their older child childhood...
but if people wait till their 30s ... then their first child will be an adolescent in their 40s and that isnt exactly a good idea to have kids at this age ... at least for the average person

both sexes also have high standards when it comes to find a partner and trust issues , manly for the laws which allow one of the partners to get pwned if things go wrong ...

[serenesam]

“If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin.” - Charles Darwin

[serenesam]

When someone says “it’s all in the genes,” is that actually an erroneous statement? What if there’s a preceding cause causing certain genes to appear the way they are? One could give/assign a serial number to gene so and so but that is simply just a human being’s attempt to differentiate and understand something. In addition, I believe that saying “it's all in the genes” is just as erroneous with or without environment. You see, even if environment had zero contribution, it still can’t be all in the genes. Analogously, what if the gene or genes themselves fit the technical denotative definition of the word “symptom?” What if the gene or genes are behaving in a manner that fits the technical denotative definition of the word “process?” What if there’s some kind of “mechanism” where a slight disruption could have unseen consequences? I believe this is why I’m not really a fan of the word “genetic determinism” as I prefer the word “biological determinism” even though they may be used interchangeably. Could this be one of those situations where being vague or a generalist is better than being a specialist? The word “genetic determinism” appear to make it seem like genes are the initial cause or starting point but is it really? The word “biological determinism” makes more sense because perhaps it’s actually more accurate as it appears to suggest some kind of complex mechanism which is likely the case.

[serenesam]

“CHAIN MIGRATION must end now! Some people come in, and they bring their whole family with them, who can be truly evil. NOT ACCEPTABLE!” - US President Donald Trump

Source: Trump tweets "CHAIN MIGRATION must end now"

[serenesam]

Glad to know that Lauren Southern is aware of internet censorship in China in the above Youtube video.

[serenesam]

Glad to know that Lauren Southern is aware of internet censorship in China in the above Youtube video.

I believe Lauren in the above link has the following music by Xurious in the background:



Could this be it? Is she inching closer to The Alt-Right? Is she actually Alt-Right per se?

[serenesam]

As the men in your country start dying off for various reasons such as suicide, are you sure you’ll be equipped to handle any threat coming from outside of your country that consists mostly of men different from your men? Are you sure your army/military would be optimized if half of them (yes 50%) were not of the male sex? Think very, very carefully.

[serenesam]

[serenesam]

The Youtube video in the above notes that there are 16 common facial signatures. Could this indicate or reflect the 16 MBTI types? If so, I have to wonder which is more accurate being that of getting professionally typed or finding your facial signature.