0

Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,691 Given: 313 |
Which one is the better?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,875 Given: 2,199 |
Do scientists use "crossbreeding" for humans?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,808 Given: 24,323 |
Inbreeding.
Inbreeding isn't all that bad. At least people will look more like their relatives than some ugly sheboon hybrid mutt that escaped from Area 51, so long as there haven't been generations of first cousin unions before in your line the risk is basically nonexistent. You need a very small population for inbreeding to actually become an issue as long as people keep track of their genealogy so you know if somebody is your distant cousin.
Nevertheless, inbreeding takes at least 3 generations to have noticable issues, while crossbreeding only takes 1. The royals did it and most of them looked beautiful besides one or two cases of ugly royals with face deformities that any non-inbred person can be born with.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,417 Given: 4,124 |
Inbreeding is not dangerous only when the relative is not close, otherwise it is deadly for the descendants, they develop chronic diseases and weaknesses in the genes, among other things, the more distant the relative, the less the danger.
As the image says, inbreeding destroyed the house of Austria,
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8,449 Given: 8,898 |
Inbreeding is a sign of aristocracy . It is heavy on my mother's family tree. I say it works best.
Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk
Thumbs Up |
Received: 66 Given: 16 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 54,108 Given: 54,143 |
Ugly is in the eye of the beholder i think. To me mullatos are not ugly, or mixed people in general. Tyra Banks probably has some white ancestry, she has green eyes and looks stunning. Also not all mixed people are product of first generation interracial coupling, some of their ancestors might have been forced or raped like in the case of african americans, or latinos. It is hard to draw the line, of right and wrong or morality and nature here, maybe only from a strictly whitecentrist view, if you have whites on one side and everyone else on another side and you defend the purity of the white race, and every interbreeding you condemn, but from a objective point of view, if you take the whole picture and all racial or ethnic groups into account, you see it is getting more complicated, as mixing, and geneflows happened all the time.
![]()
Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn't give a hoot and hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor ever lose a war. George S. Patton
Thumbs Up |
Received: 54,108 Given: 54,143 |
I dont group MENAS and Indians with Roma, thats wrong. Why would MENA and Indians understand me well? And of course Roma, they understand me better and they make me more comfortable preferably of a similar language, religion and culture as me, so there wont be any problems i could face with her family or society.
Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn't give a hoot and hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor ever lose a war. George S. Patton
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks