View Poll Results: ..

Voters
5. You may not vote on this poll
  • inbreeding

    2 40.00%
  • crossbreding

    3 60.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Inbreeding vs crossbreding.

  1. #1
    завсегдатай black hole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:43 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Balto-Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Ancestry
    Central Russia
    Country
    Russia
    Taxonomy
    Neo danubian
    Religion
    Agnosticism
    Gender
    Posts
    2,383
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,691
    Given: 313

    0 Not allowed!

    Default Inbreeding vs crossbreding.

    Which one is the better?

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Last Online
    12-27-2018 @ 11:00 AM
    Ethnicity
    Misanthrope
    Country
    Mongolia
    Politics
    Lefty Alt-right
    Hero
    Angela Merkel
    Gender
    Posts
    2,594
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,875
    Given: 2,199

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Do scientists use "crossbreeding" for humans?

  3. #3
    Resident Gadfly
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Canadian
    Country
    Canada
    Gender
    Posts
    3,315
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,808
    Given: 24,323

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Inbreeding.

    Inbreeding isn't all that bad. At least people will look more like their relatives than some ugly sheboon hybrid mutt that escaped from Area 51, so long as there haven't been generations of first cousin unions before in your line the risk is basically nonexistent. You need a very small population for inbreeding to actually become an issue as long as people keep track of their genealogy so you know if somebody is your distant cousin.

    Nevertheless, inbreeding takes at least 3 generations to have noticable issues, while crossbreeding only takes 1. The royals did it and most of them looked beautiful besides one or two cases of ugly royals with face deformities that any non-inbred person can be born with.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dorian View Post
    We GrecoRomansIberians once did the mistake of civilizing these cave-dwellers ,I suggest we make an alliance with muslims to accelerate their takeover
    Quote Originally Posted by renaissance12 View Post
    Scandinavia is not Europe
    Quote Originally Posted by Mortimer View Post
    It's OK to date girls 16+ they are not children remember the old song 'sweet sixteen'
    Quote Originally Posted by Tooting Carmen View Post
    Whites are often jealous of Blacks for their athleticism, creative talent and sexual prowess.

  4. #4
    Veteran Member Ruggery's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:38 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic,Celtic
    Ethnicity
    ancestry german
    Country
    Argentina
    Gender
    Posts
    11,084
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,417
    Given: 4,124

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sean View Post
    Inbreeding.

    Inbreeding isn't all that bad. At least people will look more like their relatives than some ugly sheboon hybrid mutt that escaped from Area 51, so long as there haven't been generations of first cousin unions before in your line the risk is basically nonexistent. You need a very small population for inbreeding to actually become an issue as long as people keep track of their genealogy so you know if somebody is your distant cousin.

    Nevertheless, inbreeding takes at least 3 generations to have noticable issues, while crossbreeding only takes 1. The royals did it and most of them looked beautiful besides one or two cases of ugly royals with face deformities that any non-inbred person can be born with.
    Inbreeding is not dangerous only when the relative is not close, otherwise it is deadly for the descendants, they develop chronic diseases and weaknesses in the genes, among other things, the more distant the relative, the less the danger.
    As the image says, inbreeding destroyed the house of Austria,

  5. #5
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Richmondbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 06:40 AM
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Celtic, Germanic, Anglo, Baltic
    Ethnicity
    English, French, Irish, Scottish, German, Distant American Indian
    Ancestry
    Mother's Side: Colonial Virginia. Fathers Side: German/Lithuania early 1900s.
    Country
    United States
    Region
    Virginia
    Y-DNA
    R-M417
    mtDNA
    H
    Taxonomy
    Alpine-Atlantid-CM
    Politics
    Paleo Conservative
    Hero
    General Lee
    Religion
    Christian Protestant
    Relationship Status
    Single
    Gender
    Posts
    13,750
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,449
    Given: 8,898

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Inbreeding is a sign of aristocracy . It is heavy on my mother's family tree. I say it works best.

    Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last Online
    06-29-2022 @ 02:36 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    No idea
    Ethnicity
    Unknown British Isles, white
    Ancestry
    Scots, Irish, Welsh, French according to family history.
    Country
    United States
    Religion
    Nonreligious
    Relationship Status
    Married
    Age
    57
    Gender
    Posts
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 66
    Given: 16

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Richmondbread View Post
    It is heavy on my mother's family tree.

    Sent from my SM-G960U1 using Tapatalk
    Well, theres a bit more data on the Inbreeding isnt good side of the ledger.


  7. #7
    Member lo_ovalle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Last Online
    Today @ 04:42 AM
    Location
    STGO
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Chilean
    Ethnicity
    None
    Country
    Chile
    Taxonomy
    White passing, according hundreds of europeans.
    Age
    25
    Gender
    Posts
    116
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sean View Post
    Inbreeding.

    Inbreeding isn't all that bad. At least people will look more like their relatives than some ugly sheboon hybrid mutt that escaped from Area 51, so long as there haven't been generations of first cousin unions before in your line the risk is basically nonexistent. You need a very small population for inbreeding to actually become an issue as long as people keep track of their genealogy so you know if somebody is your distant cousin.

    Nevertheless, inbreeding takes at least 3 generations to have noticable issues, while crossbreeding only takes 1. The royals did it and most of them looked beautiful besides.
    That utopia is so ridiculous from the moment that it is assumed that people related by blood will always have similarities.

    There are siblings whose phenotypic resemblance is as low as that of any stranger.

  8. #8
    Kara Boğa
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Mortimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:53 AM
    Ethnicity
    Eastern European Roma
    Ancestry
    Roma, Serb, Russian
    Country
    Austria
    Region
    Washington
    Gender
    Posts
    78,524
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 54,108
    Given: 54,143

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sean View Post
    Inbreeding.

    Inbreeding isn't all that bad. At least people will look more like their relatives than some ugly sheboon hybrid mutt that escaped from Area 51, so long as there haven't been generations of first cousin unions before in your line the risk is basically nonexistent. You need a very small population for inbreeding to actually become an issue as long as people keep track of their genealogy so you know if somebody is your distant cousin.

    Nevertheless, inbreeding takes at least 3 generations to have noticable issues, while crossbreeding only takes 1. The royals did it and most of them looked beautiful besides one or two cases of ugly royals with face deformities that any non-inbred person can be born with.
    Ugly is in the eye of the beholder i think. To me mullatos are not ugly, or mixed people in general. Tyra Banks probably has some white ancestry, she has green eyes and looks stunning. Also not all mixed people are product of first generation interracial coupling, some of their ancestors might have been forced or raped like in the case of african americans, or latinos. It is hard to draw the line, of right and wrong or morality and nature here, maybe only from a strictly whitecentrist view, if you have whites on one side and everyone else on another side and you defend the purity of the white race, and every interbreeding you condemn, but from a objective point of view, if you take the whole picture and all racial or ethnic groups into account, you see it is getting more complicated, as mixing, and geneflows happened all the time.

    Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn't give a hoot and hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor ever lose a war. George S. Patton

  9. #9
    Mermaid
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Nixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Croatian
    Country
    Croatia
    Gender
    Posts
    464
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 561
    Given: 539

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mortimer View Post
    Ugly is in the eye of the beholder i think. To me mullatos are not ugly, or mixed people in general. Tyra Banks probably has some white ancestry, she has green eyes and looks stunning. Also not all mixed people are product of first generation interracial coupling, some of their ancestors might have been forced or raped like in the case of african americans, or latinos. It is hard to draw the line, of right and wrong or morality and nature here, maybe only from a strictly whitecentrist view, if you have whites on one side and everyone else on another side and you defend the purity of the white race, and every interbreeding you condemn, but from a objective point of view, if you take the whole picture and all racial or ethnic groups into account, you see it is getting more complicated, as mixing, and geneflows happened all the time.

    Who do you find more attractive, Roma beauties or blonde blue eyed Scandinavian girls? Who understands you better and who makes you more comfortable?
    Last edited by Nixie; 06-27-2022 at 09:55 AM. Reason: wrong assumption

  10. #10
    Kara Boğa
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Mortimer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last Online
    Today @ 06:53 AM
    Ethnicity
    Eastern European Roma
    Ancestry
    Roma, Serb, Russian
    Country
    Austria
    Region
    Washington
    Gender
    Posts
    78,524
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 54,108
    Given: 54,143

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sylvanas View Post
    Who do you find more attractive, Roma, Indian, MENA beauties or blonde blue eyed Scandinavian girls? Who understands you better and who makes you more comfortable?
    I dont group MENAS and Indians with Roma, thats wrong. Why would MENA and Indians understand me well? And of course Roma, they understand me better and they make me more comfortable preferably of a similar language, religion and culture as me, so there wont be any problems i could face with her family or society.
    Americans play to win at all times. I wouldn't give a hoot and hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor ever lose a war. George S. Patton

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •